June money numbers cast doubt on ECB President Lagarde’s assertion that policy-makers – and by extension the Eurozone economy – are “in a good place”.

Six-month growth of the preferred narrow / broad money measures here – non-financial M1 / M3, comprising holdings of households and non-financial corporations (NFCs) – fell further to 3.4% and 1.6% annualised respectively last month. The latter is the slowest since December 2023 and compares with a 4.9% average over 2015-19 – see chart 1.

Chart 1

250725c1

Weakness is focused on the corporate sector: NFC M1 / M3 deposits rose by only 0.5% and 0.1% annualised respectively in the six months to June, implying real terms contraction – chart 2.

Chart 2

250725c2-renamed

Corporate liquidity deterioration suggests that companies are under increased financial pressure and will rein in expansion plans – chart 3. A contraction in UK real corporate money preceded recent employment cut-backs.

Chart 3

Chart 3 showing Eurozone Non-Residential Fixed Investment (% 2q) & Real Corporate Deposits (% 6m)

Six-month narrow money momentum is notably weaker in France / Italy than Germany / Spain, although German growth has fallen back since April – chart 4.

Chart 4

250725c4-renamed

Consensus commentary focuses on bank lending, which, as an empirical matter, lags money trends. Adjusted loans to households and NFCs rose by a solid 0.4% on the month but six-month growth eased from 3.0% to 2.8% annualised. The “credit impulse”, in other words, may be rolling over.

Recent rate cuts are feeding through and it is possible that monetary weakness will prove temporary. Still, ECB officials should be concerned by the slowdown and signalling an openness to further easing rather than projecting complacency.

Notre rapport de 2024 sur l’investissement responsable reflète notre engagement à l’égard des investissements dans les infrastructures durables et rend compte des initiatives que nous avons prises dans l’ensemble de notre portefeuille au cours de la dernière année.

Points saillants du rapport :

  • Investisseurs à long terme : En tant qu’entreprise appartenant à nos employés, nous investissons directement aux côtés de nos clients, en harmonisant notre succès avec le leur. Cet engagement commun nous pousse à mettre l’accent sur l’établissement et le maintien d’un portefeuille résilient et très performant qui offre de la valeur à long terme.
  • Pratiques durables : Compte tenu de la nature à long terme de nos investissements, nous reconnaissons qu’il est essentiel de fonctionner de façon responsable pour protéger et améliorer la valeur des actifs. Nous identifions, analysons, évaluons, gérons et surveillons les risques et les occasions liés à l’investissement responsable tout au long du cycle de vie des investissements.
  • Projets ayant une incidence : Nos investissements fournissent des services essentiels à travers un ensemble diversifié d’infrastructures critiques de transport, sociales et d’énergie renouvelable, y compris une capacité d’exploitation de plus de 2 GW grâce à une gamme de sources d’énergie propre, dont l’énergie éolienne, hydroélectrique et solaire.
  • Mobilisation de la collectivité : Nous travaillons activement avec des partenaires et des intervenants aux vues similaires, y compris les collectivités locales et les groupes autochtones, afin d’harmoniser les intérêts, de favoriser la compréhension mutuelle et de veiller à ce que les personnes touchées par nos projets soient impliquées de façon significative tout au long du cycle de vie des actifs.

Korean temple in front of N Seoul Tower at Namsan Mountain Park.

South Korean equities have been on a rollercoaster over the past few years. In early 2024, we saw exuberance fuelled by the announcement of the Corporate Value-Up program. Many were hoping the country was shaping up to follow in the footsteps of Japan – Super-cheap Korean equities rally on market reform talks

Hopes were shattered by disgraced former president Yoon’s attempt to impose martial law in December – South Korea rocked by president’s attempt to impose martial law

While the situation was precarious, South Korean institutions held firm and Yoon now sits in a Seoul detention centre awaiting trial while Democratic Party leader Lee Jae-Myung decisively won a June snap election on a platform of corporate governance reforms.

South Korean equities rally

Korean equities surged around the election, led by financials and technology stocks. We gradually lifted our underweight exposure to neutral and then a modest overweight through the first half of 2025, leaning into the promise of revisions to the Commercial Law Act and Lee’s support of the Value-Up program.

Line graph showing MSCI Price Indices January to June 2025

Source: LSEG Datastream

In our view, a series of policy initiatives pushed by the Lee administration have the potential to lift a host of beaten-down domestically focused names, outlined below.

Supporter of Value-Up

Despite being launched by Lee’s then opposition, his party is a supporter of Value-Up. The initiative, modelled on the Tokyo Stock Exchange reforms aims to narrow the « Korea Discount » by enhancing corporate governance, capital efficiency, and shareholder returns.

By publishing Value-Up plans and following through, Korean companies can access Korean Exchange fee exemptions, gain priority in investor relations events, and other awards to enhance market visibility. Taking these steps will also help to better align South Korean governance standards with global best practice, and in turn attract foreign capital and boost valuations.

Commercial Act revision

The Lee government quicky jumped into action to push through revisions to the Commercial Act, which align with the aims of Value-Up. In early July a revised version of the Commercial Act amendment was passed with support from both the Democratic Party and the conservative opposition as a compromise. This version:

  1. mandates that directors balance corporate and shareholder interests;
  2. requires electronic shareholder meetings for large listed companies (market cap over 2 trillion won, ~$1.5 billion); and
  3. prohibits rejecting cumulative voting requests to empower minority shareholders.

The Cabinet approved these amendments on July 15, 2025, signalling their imminent implementation.

Encouraging more equity investment and less speculative investment in housing

The government is also intent on pushing for a shift in the balance of household wealth (approximately 70% of household assets) from real estate to equities. President Lee’s aim is to channel liquidity away from housing speculation to promote greater stability in the Korean economy, and redirect capital into equities. The idea is that this will fuel investment in more productive sectors such as technology and defence in order to stimulate innovation and economic growth.

Value-Up and revisions to the Commercial Act are key levers to encourage this shift by households into domestic stocks.

Excess liquidity provides fuel for stock market rallies
Chart showing Korea M2 growth year over year versus Kospi return year over year from 2001-2024.
Source: CLSA

Fiscal loosening

The government is also taking direct action to counter stagnant economic growth. In June the government proposed a KRW30.5 trillion supplementary budget, representing 0.9% of GDP, with KRW10 trillion to be handed out as cash for consumption (equivalent to around USD100-350 per person depending on income).

Portfolio – financials exposure boosted

Our portfolio names in financials and technology in South Korea have rallied this year on hopes for President Lee Jae-Myung’s reform platform. Our position in Samsung Life is a beneficiary of the Value-Up program, and rose 67.7% in USD terms through the second quarter alone on expectations reforms will force the disposal of company holdings in affiliated companies. Samsung Life selling its position in Samsung Electronics would trigger a huge one-off gain which will free up cash to be re-deployed into more productive uses and boost returns on equity. We trimmed Samsung Life to rotate into laggard DB Insurance, which is cheaper and in our view, has greater upside catalysts, being yet to announce Value-Up plans.

Leading bank KB Financial was another strong performer, reporting robust profit growth along with a surprise share buyback and cancellation as well as a higher dividend. The bank trades on a modest 0.7x price to book with a return on equity of 9.7% and rising, as well as a 4% dividend yield.

KB Financial driving ROE higher
Chart showing KB Financial's ROA, ROE and ROE excluding non-recurring items from 2020 to Q1 2025.
Source: KB Financial Q1 2025

… while buybacks continue
Bar graph showing KB Financial's common shares outstanding from 2020 to March 2025.
Source: KB Financial Q1 2025

… and dividends increase
Bar graph showing KB Financial's dividends per share from 2020 to Q1 2025.
Source: KB Financial Q1 2025

KB also looks set to benefit from planned fiscal loosening by the Lee government and falling central bank rates boosting loan growth.

More to come?

Shareholder and political pressure on South Korean corporates to address their poor corporate governance records continues to build. Progress will no doubt be slow and incremental, but there is a lot of low hanging fruit the government can pursue including changes to capital, dividend and capital gains taxes to encourage investment and reform simultaneously.

Success in these efforts could well be the basis for a full market re-rating.

EM equities outperformed DM on average historically under two conditions, namely 1) global (i.e. G7 plus E7) six-month real narrow money growth was above industrial output growth and 2) real money growth was stronger in the E7 than G7. The first condition indicates a supportive global liquidity backdrop while the second signals stronger economic prospects for EM than DM.

Allowing for data reporting lags, these conditions were satisfied from end-February through end-June, a period during which MSCI EM outperformed MSCI World by 5.8%. However, the latest numbers, for May, show global six-month real money growth slipping back below industrial output momentum, although the E7 / G7 gap remains positive – see chart 1.

Chart 1

180725c1

The suspension of the positive signal may prove temporary. Global industrial output has been boosted by front-loading to avoid higher US tariff rates, with payback likely during H2.

Chart 2 shows six-month real narrow money momentum in major EM economies and includes June data for Brazil, China and India. The stand-out recent development has been a pick-up in India in response to aggressive RBI easing, suggesting acceleration in an already strong economy.

Chart 2

180725c2

Chinese six-month momentum stabilised in June after falling in April / May. The series shown is based on the new official M1 measure, which includes household demand deposits and is close to the “true M1” definition historically used here. The June stabilisation followed a cut in reserve requirements in May and an associated further decline in money rates.

The Chinese slowdown since March is regarded here as of limited concern and likely to reverse, for the following reasons. First, there has been no loss of momentum in “private non-financial M1”, comprising currency and demand deposits of households and non-financial enterprises – chart 3. The aggregate slowdown appears to be attributable a fall in money holdings of government-related organisations and / or non-bank financial institutions.

Chart 3

180725c3

Secondly, M1 excludes fiscal deposits, which have been growing solidly ahead of likely spending and / or transfers to government-related bodies. Momentum of an expanded aggregate including such deposits fell by less in April / May, recovering slightly in June.

Elsewhere. Taiwanese growth firmed in May and may rise further as currency strength forces the central bank to ease. By contrast, momentum has slowed in Indonesia, Korea and Mexico and remains negative in Brazil.

Windmill turbines on a sunny day in Germany on a blooming bright yellow field and blue sky.

In our last commentary, we discussed Germany’s recent infrastructure bill worth EUR500 billion to be deployed over twelve years. A key component of this bill is climate-led investments, worth one-fifth of the total budget, which finances the energy transition and climate protection measures. Examples of these measures include energy-efficient building renovations, development of electric mobility infrastructure, expansion of the hydrogen industry, promotion of energy efficiency, technologies to decarbonize industrial operations, etc.

Many countries have implemented clean energy plans to mitigate climate risk. Norway generates almost 100% of its electricity from renewable sources, primarily hydropower. Other leaders in renewable energy adoption include Sweden, Costa Rica, the UK, Iceland, New Zealand and Germany, etc.

A lesser known, but much bigger investment plan, is Japan’s Green Transformation (GX) policy worth JPY150 trillion (over USD1.1 trillion) to be executed over ten years. It was announced in February 2023 with many detailed targets across energy, transport, construction, industry and finance. Its goal is to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 and transform the country’s economy toward clean energy.

In our Sustainable Global Small Cap Strategy, clean energy and sustainable infrastructure are among the major themes. We have witnessed the strong growth of some holdings benefiting from these mega trends. Below are a few examples:

  • Boralex Inc. (BLX CN) develops, builds and operates renewable energy power facilities (wind, hydroelectric, solar and thermal). It owns and operates about 100 wind power stations, 15 hydroelectric plants, a dozen solar power stations and two energy storage facilities. Its combined installed capacity has more than doubled in the past five years to over 3.1 GW, with 8 GW in the pipeline. Major markets are Canada, France, the United States and the UK.
  • Aecon Group Inc. (ARE CN) is a Canadian construction company, providing a range of services to private and public sector clients in infrastructure, mostly in North America. In 2024, 59% of its revenues and 78% of backlog were tied to sustainability projects from renewable energy (hydroelectric, geothermal, solar) to energy transition (nuclear, battery storage, energy transmission and grid modernization) and water management (supply, distribution and wastewater treatment). As of March 31, 2025, it had a record-high backlog of CAD9.7 billion.
  • Nexans SA (NEX FP) is a global leader in cable systems and services. It is strategically focusing on the electrification market. 75% of sales generated from products and services contribute to energy transition and efficiency. Well-known for its high-voltage transmission cable and subsea cable, Nexans specializes in power generation, transmission, distribution, infrastructure, telecommunication, mobility services and more. As of March 31, 2025, it had a record-high backlog of EUR8.1billion. Major markets are Norway, France, Germany and Canada.

Within the theme of sustainability is the growing industry of green hydrogen. The global green hydrogen market size is currently estimated at over USD12 billion in 2025 and is expected to expand at a CAGR of 41% from 2025 to 2034.

Projected growth of green hydrogen market size from 2024 to 2034.

There are national policies in place that favour green hydrogen: Germany’s hydrogen strategy targets at least 10 GW production of green hydrogen by 2030; the UK’s hydrogen strategy requires at least half of its 10 GW target to come from green hydrogen by 2030; Japan’s hydrogen strategy focuses on achieving carbon neutrality by 2050 through the widespread adoption of hydrogen across various sectors.

There are three main types of electrolysis used for green hydrogen production: Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM), Alkaline and Solid Oxide. Advantages of PEM electrolysis specifically are that it uses a solid polymer electrolyte membrane and operates at higher current densities, making it suitable for dynamic and intermittent renewable energy sources. Major players in the PEM segment include Plug Power, Nel Hydrogen, Cummins and, one of our holdings, ITM Power PLC (ITM LN).

ITM Power is a pure-play in green hydrogen and manufactures electrolyzers based on PEM technology; it’s known for its work with Linde on large-scale PEM electrolyzers. Germany is its biggest market generating 37% of total sales, followed by the UK, Austria, Australia and rest of Europe.

Countries prioritizing initiatives for renewable energy, sustainable infrastructure and electrification will look to work with companies specializing in these sectors. We feel that the holdings within our Sustainable Global Small Cap Strategy are well positioned to benefit from this global effort toward a greener future.

UK money momentum has weakened alarmingly. The broad non-financial M4 measure – comprising holdings of households and private non-financial corporations (PNFCs) – grew by just 1.9% annualised in the three months to May. Non-financial M1 contracted at a 2.7% pace – see chart 1.

Chart 1

110725c1

Three-month bank lending growth held up but is likely to fall sharply as a large monthly rise in March – related to the end of the stamp duty holiday – drops out of the calculation. Lending typically follows money trends.

It is unusual for narrow money to lag broader measures when interest rates are falling – lower rates reduce the opportunity cost of holding more liquid forms of money, encouraging a shift out of time deposits and savings accounts. 21% of non-financial M1 is non-interest-bearing. The average interest rate on the stock of household time deposits fell by 31 bp between August and May, according to BoE data.

The demand to hold narrow money is driven mainly by the need to finance future spending, so weakness despite rate cuts is ominous for economic prospects. Put differently, money trends support the view here that MPC policy easing has been too slow, providing insufficient support for activity and increasing the risk of an inflation undershoot.

The monetary relapse could partly reflect payback for temporary factors that boosted growth in late 2024 / early 2025.

A jump in money numbers in October appears to have been related to asset sales in anticipation of changes to capital taxes in the Budget at the end of that month. An asset disposal can boost broad money if financing by the purchaser involves – directly or indirectly – an expansion of banks’ balance sheets*. The effect, however, would be expected to reverse as the seller of the asset deployed the proceeds.

Mortgage lending and broad money were boosted in Q1 by front-loading of housing transactions ahead of the end of the stamp duty holiday. Increased activity may also have resulted in a temporarily higher demand for narrow money.

A reversal of these effects may explain broad money stagnation and a narrow money decline in April / May. Still, annual rates of change should be free of such influences and have slowed to 2.5% for non-financial M1 and 3.6% for M4, from recent peaks of 3.4% and 4.8% respectively. Eurozone annual non-financial M1 growth, by contrast, has risen further to 4.3%.

The sectoral breakdown shows that the recent fall in narrow money reflects a switch by households into time deposits / cash ISAs – their aggregate money holdings have continued to expand, though at a slower pace. By contrast, corporate broad money contracted in April / May, consistent with a negative financial impact from NI and minimum wage hikes – chart 2.

Chart 2

110725c2

The annual rate of change of corporate broad money is back in negative territory, following small positive readings over December-April, suggesting further weakness in employment and fading capex prospects.

*More precisely, an expansion of banks’ domestic lending or net foreign assets, or a fall in their net non-deposit liabilities.

The latest signal from monetary data is that global economic momentum will inflect weaker from around late 2025. Cyclical considerations suggest that this will mark the beginning of a sustained downswing into 2027.

Lagged money trends argue that underlying inflation will fall further and remain low through 2026. Nevertheless, central banks may be slow to offset economic weakness with additional policy stimulus because of concerns about tariff effects and fiscal indiscipline, as well as scarring from the 2021-22 inflation surge.

The suggestion is that equity markets face rising headwinds, with another sustained bull phase unlikely before 2027, when key cycles are scheduled to bottom. An appropriate strategy may be to underweight markets where monetary trends are relatively weak – Japan and the UK currently – while overweighting sectors with lower earnings sensitivity to expected cyclical weakness.

Elaborating on the above, global six-month real narrow money momentum – a key leading indicator in the approach followed here – reached a local high in March, falling sharply in April / May – see chart 1.

Chart 1

080725c1

The rise from October 2024 into March suggested that the global economy would regain some momentum from around mid-2025, based on the recent average lag. A June rise in manufacturing PMI new orders could mark the start of such a shift, although results from national (as opposed to S&P Global) surveys were mixed. Still, April / May monetary weakness argues that any near-term recovery will be short-lived, with economic indicators likely to deteriorate again from around late 2025 – chart 2.

Chart 2

080725c2

The latest fall in real money growth has been broadly based across countries, reinforcing the negative signal. Momentum is notably weak in Japan and the UK, arguing for economic underperformance. Eurozone growth has held up but hasn’t yet crossed above the US, cautioning against “europhoria” – chart 3.

Chart 3

080725c3

From a cyclical perspective, the stockbuilding cycle is in the window for a peak in terms of both time since the last low (Q1 2023) and the contribution of inventory accumulation to annual G7 GDP growth – chart 4. The latter has been boosted by front-loading to avoid tariffs, which appears to have continued in Q2.

Chart 4

080725c4

The cycle should turn down by early 2026 at the latest and the baseline assumption here remains for a low in H1 2027, implying that the current cycle will be slightly longer than the 3.5 year historical average, balancing a shorter-than-average prior cycle. Stockbuilding cycle downswings are usually associated with significant slowdowns (or worse) in global economic growth and underperformance of risk assets.

A key question is whether the coming downswing will be accompanied by weakness in the housing and / or business investment cycles, in which case a 2026-27 recession becomes the baseline. A housing downturn is more likely, given the maturity of the current cycle (16 years versus an 18-year average) and downward pressure from elevated longer-term interest rates. The business investment cycle is less advanced (year five versus a nine-year average), with corporate financial balances still healthy and AI deployment providing a tailwind.

Close attention, therefore, should be paid to housing indicators. The six-month rate of change of G7 housing permits / starts recently turned negative, suggesting a darkening outlook – chart 5.

Chart 5

080725c5

Inflation follows money growth with a roughly two-year lag, according to the simplistic monetary rule, which outperformed every other forecasting approach in 2021-22. Annual broad money growth bottomed in mid-2023 in the G7 and a year later globally, with limited subsequent recoveries. The suggestion is that underlying inflation will fall further and remain low through 2026.

On the analysis here, therefore, central banks could limit economic weakness by delivering timely additional policy stimulus while still meeting, or even undershooting, their inflation objectives. The US Fed, however, may continue to drag its feet amid uncertainty about near-term tariff effects and counterproductive political pressure, with a knock-on effect on the pace of easing elsewhere.

Both global “excess” money flow indicators used here to assess equity market prospects are currently negative, having been mixed three months ago. Specifically, global six-month real narrow money momentum has crossed back below industrial output momentum, while 12-month real money momentum remains beneath its long-run average – chart 6.

Chart 6

080725c6

The indicators were misleadingly negative in 2023-24 because of a stock overhang resulting from the 2020-21 money growth surge. The assessment here is that there is no longer any excess relative to current levels of nominal GDP and asset prices.

Arial view of bank towers in Frankfurt, Germany.

Germany has embarked on a historic transformation of its fiscal and economic landscape with the passage of its latest infrastructure bill in March 2025. This legislation, resulting from a rare constitutional amendment, is poised to have profound and far-reaching effects on the German economy, public services and the broader European region over the next decade.

The new law creates a €500 billion infrastructure fund, to be deployed over twelve years, aimed at modernizing Germany’s aging infrastructure and stimulating economic growth. This fund operates outside the traditional constraints of Germany’s “debt brake,” a constitutional rule that previously limited new government borrowing to 0.35% of GDP. The reform also allows for increased borrowing by the federal states and exempts defence spending above 1% of GDP from debt restrictions, thereby freeing up additional fiscal resources for investment.

Last week, the government coalition agreed to borrow almost €500 billion to raise the defence budget to the new NATO target of 3.5% of GDP by 2029, and to borrow almost €300 billion for infrastructure over the same period.

This fiscal expansion should boost domestic demand for many years and more than compensate for weaker external demand. Fixed investment in machinery and equipment, as well as in construction, are likely to benefit from this fiscal impulse.

The infrastructure bill is expected to have positive spillover effects across the European Union. Improved transport links, increased demand for goods and services and a more competitive German economy could strengthen the EU’s overall economic resilience. Furthermore, the focus on energy transition and digitalization aligns with broader European climate and innovation goals.

Konecranes PLC (KCRA HE), one of our holdings in our international strategy, is well positioned to benefit from this massive infrastructure spend.

Konecranes is a global leader in material handling solutions, serving a broad range of customers across several industries. Its product portfolio lifts, handles and moves goods in a safer, more productive and sustainable way. The company reports under three business segments:

  • Industrial services: It provides maintenance services and spare parts for any kind of cranes and hoists. With presence in more than 23 countries, Konecranes has one of the most extensive maintenance coverages globally. This segment represents 36% of revenue but more than 56% of income.
  • Industrial equipment: It provides industrial cranes and hoists for a wide range of customers, including general manufacturing, logistics, distributors, construction and engineering, metals and transportation equipment. This segment represents 29% of revenue and 20% of income.
  • Port solutions: It provides heavy cranes, mobile equipment, software and services for the container handling industry. Konecranes remains the only western player with a broad end-to-end offering for port terminals. Most of the world’s automated container terminals run on Konecranes product. This segment represents 35% of revenue and 24% of income.

Konecranes is exposed to structural growth through increasing automation and digitalization in industry, where its smart lifting and IoT solutions are in high demand. The global rise in e-commerce and logistics boosts demand for its port and warehouse equipment. Sustainability trends drive customers to modernize with Konecranes’ energy-efficient and low-emission solutions. Additionally, infrastructure investment and industrial growth in emerging markets continue to expand its long-term customer base. We believe it is well-positioned to benefit from higher defence and infrastructure spending globally.

A further rise in China’s trade surplus over the past year has been accompanied by bumper growth of US dollar deposits in Hong Kong, suggesting that Chinese entities have been building a hedge against RMB depreciation – see chart 1.

Chart 1

240625c1

US dollar deposits grew by $139 bn or 15.6% in the year to April to stand at $975 bn, equivalent to 4.5% of US M2. They have risen much more strongly than Hong Kong dollar deposits, now representing 92% of the value of the latter, up from 79% at end-2022.

Low inflation has allowed China to gain competitiveness without nominal depreciation, with the BIS real effective rate at a 13-year low – chart 2.

Chart 2

240625c2

Is demand for US dollar balances starting to wane? The recent fall in Hong Kong rates is consistent with a switch into local dollars. The one-year Hong Kong / US rate differential is the most negative since 2005, before a sustained appreciation of the RMB – chart 3.

Chart 3

240625c3

Chinese f/x settlement numbers, meanwhile, indicate that the authorities intervened to hold down the RMB for a second month in May. Upward pressure had been signalled by a forward premium on the offshore RMB, which has persisted in June – chart 4.

Chart 4

240625c4

The onshore spot rate has moved from the weak end to the middle of the PBoC’s trading band, with the central parity rate edging higher – chart 5.

Chart 5

240625c5

Any signal from the Chinese authorities of acquiescence to an appreciating trend could quickly become self-fulfilling by encouraging a further unwind of hedges, including via a reduced US dollar share of Hong Kong deposits.

Chinese monetary trends suggest a continuation of lacklustre economic growth with negligible inflation.

Six-month momentum of narrow and broad money picked up strongly during H2 2024, raising hopes of a reflationary scenario. Growth rates, however, have fallen back since Q1, to around the middle of ranges in recent years – see chart 1.

Chart 1

170625c1

May activity numbers confirm an economic slowdown, with six-month growth of industrial output and fixed asset investment falling again, and home sales contracting at a faster pace. Retail sales were boosted by subsidy programmes and promotions, with payback likely – chart 2.

Chart 2

170625c2

House prices haven’t stabilised. The three-month change in new house prices has stalled below zero, with that for existing homes becoming more negative – chart 3.

Chart 3

170625c3

Monetary developments don’t yet warrant pessimism. Six-month broad money momentum remains respectable, at 4.0% – 8.2% annualised – in May. This could be consistent with nominal GDP growth of c.6.5% pa, based on a long-run trend rise of 1.75% pa in the money to GDP ratio.

Narrow money momentum has weakened more sharply but the sectoral breakdown is reassuring, showing stable growth of household and enterprise money, with the aggregate slowdown due to a fall in demand deposits of government-related bodies – chart 4.

Chart 4

170625c4

This fall is unlikely to be a leading indicator of reduced spending by these bodies, particularly as their overall deposit growth – i.e. including time as well demand deposits – has remained stable.

The money numbers, moreover, exclude fiscal (i.e. central government) deposits, six-month growth of which has picked up since Q1. Demand deposits of government-related bodies could recover as funds are transferred to finance spending projects.