Page 12 | CC&L Financial Group Ltd.

In our December 2024 commentary, we framed investing in Brazil as a high-stakes game of Blackjack. We argued that macro uncertainties such as fiscal deficits and political volatility were the low cards (2–6) which favoured the dealer. While these factors make for a daunting investment backdrop, our view was that these “cards” stood a chance of being dealt out as President Lula’s term progressed toward the 2026 elections. As a result, the proportion of high cards (10–Ace), being Brazil’s economic strengths and its reform potential, would start to rise and underpin an increasingly favourable set up for the player (investor).

Since our December post until August 2025, the deck has run down as October 2026 presidential elections in Brazil approach. As anticipated, the stakes are intensifying: Latin America’s 2025 electoral calendar is heating up, with presidential votes scheduled in Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador, and mid-term elections in Argentina, setting the stage for regional sentiment shifts that could influence outcomes in Brazil.

By the second quarter of 2026, we expect to have a good sense of the deck count and our chances of getting a Blackjack. It is likely that the “risk premium” for Brazilian equities has already peaked and will fall as early polls are released, candidates emerge and policy platforms take shape. This creates a unique window now for measured risk-taking as we await further confirmation on the above, selectively allocating chips (capital) to high-conviction hands where the asymmetry of risks favours the upside.

Active equity fund redemptions decelerate

Source: Itau BBA (August 2025)

So far, our approach has been assertive but disciplined: avoiding high-rolling bets on speculative names in favour of quality opportunities. This has paid off handsomely so far, typified by outperformance in portfolio holdings like Vivara (a jewellery retailer) and SABESP (sanitation utility), delivering strong returns amid a resilient economy.

Brazilian water utility SABESP returns improving

Source: SABESP Q2 2025 investor presentation

Recent macro and political developments: Improving outlook, but risks linger

Since December 2024, Brazil’s economic resilience, despite the tension between tight monetary policy and loose fiscal policy, is undoubtedly a high card. GDP growth is moderating from 3.4% in 2024 to around 2.2–2.3% in 2025, as high interest rates start biting into activity. However, positives abound: unemployment hit record lows in mid-2025, inflation is easing (expected at 5.0% year-end) and the economy is positioned to weather Trump’s proposed 50% tariffs on non-US imports, thanks to exemptions for key commodities and diversified exports.

Politically, the deck is shifting favourably for investors seeking change. Lula’s approval rating has dipped amid unease over economic stability, with polls modelling runoffs showing him mostly behind right-wing figures like Tarcísio de Freitas (current governor of Sao Paulo State). Former president Bolsonaro himself is sidelined by legal troubles, reducing “anti-establishment” risks. The 2024 municipal elections saw gains for conservative candidates, signalling a potential 2026 swing toward market-friendly policies if a centre-right candidate consolidates support.

This echoes our original thesis: as Lula’s socialist term winds down, extreme pessimism over the economy should fade, creating a disconnect between strong company fundamentals and cheap equity valuations.

Core positions: Delivering as expected, with Q2 2025 earnings validation

Our core Latin American holdings have performed robustly, showcasing consistent top-line growth, improving returns (ROIC/ROE) and strong moats in defensive sectors. This validates our philosophy of steering clear of higher-risk names (e.g., leveraged cyclicals, where low margins and geopolitical exposure have led to underperformance amid prolonged high rates and global uncertainty). Initial signs of a softer local economy – for example, a Q2 retail slowdown – have hit speculative plays harder, reinforcing our quality focus.

The results from Q2 2025 underscore management prowess and support the view that our Brazilian names should be robust amid a volatile macro backdrop: top-line momentum (avg. +15% YoY) and ROIC/ROE improvements (avg. +2–3 pts). We are also excited about emerging opportunities as a “positive count” in the deck for Brazil, an opportunity to add some new names from our opinion list.

Valuations in Brazil remain attractive

Source: Itau BBA (August 2025)

In a couple of months, our planned trip to the region (with a packed agenda) will allow on-the-ground validation, potentially enhancing conviction in existing and prospective portfolio companies.

Outlook: Calibrating bets as odds shift

As inflation cooling and political fragmentation dissipating act as low cards exiting the deck, the count could tilt toward investors. For now, play smart; global headwinds (Trump tariffs and a US slowdown) and domestic fiscal risks could bust hands. We remain focused on quality amid depressed valuations and are keeping eyes on the 2026 Ace: a conservative presidential win that could unlock multi-baggers. Stay tuned for post-trip updates; this game is far from over.

In the world of cosmetics, France has been the undisputed number one with its array of global brands: L’Oréal, Lancôme, Sisley, Vichy, Clarins…the list goes on. But with the emergence of Gen Z consumers (born between mid-1990s and early-2010s), whose purchasing behaviour is influenced by social media and are known to be intrepid in trying out new products (less brand loyalty), and the greater acceptance of Korean culture, or “K-culture” abroad, K-cosmetics have gained a foothold in the global market. In 2024, Korea became the number one exporter of cosmetics to the United States with USD1.7 billion (22.4% market share) surpassing France at USD1.3 billion.

Korea maintained its position as the top exporter of cosmetics to Japan, the world’s third-largest cosmetics market, for the third year in a row. Korea also became the third-largest exporter of cosmetics in the world last year, surpassing Germany (USD9.1 billion) and after France (USD23.3 billion) and the United States (USD11.1 billion). Korea is expected to surpass the United States as the second-largest exporter of cosmetics by the end of this year or next year.

Source: IHS Markit Connect Global Trade Atlas (June 10, 2025)

Consumers of Korean cosmetics outside of Korea are no longer confined to Asians. K-cosmetics now have a wider acceptance across race and ethnicity.

Source: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (South Korea)

China remains the largest market for K-cosmetics, but not by far, followed by Asia ex-mainland China, the United States and the European Union, the latter of which has been seeing strong growth.

Source: Korea International Trade Association
Note: EU5 includes Germany, France, Italy, Spain and the UK

What explains K-cosmetics’ success?

Product innovation: In 2008, Amorepacific Corporation (090430 KS) released the “Air Cushion,” the world’s first multifunctional, cushion-type cosmetics delivery mechanism that forever changed how foundations are applied on to the skin. More recently, there was the innovation of the “Reedle Shot” – a skincare treatment that utilizes micro-needling to deliver active ingredients deeper into the skin. It does not use actual needles – it is a cream that can be applied directly on skin, first commercialized by VT Cosmetics (under VT Corp. Ltd.) (018290 KS).
High quality for the price: When it comes to taking care of the skin, Korean women are known to be meticulous. They have very high standards for quality and this is why Korea is often the testbed for global cosmetics brands before their global launch of new products.
Product variety: As of December 2024, there were over 30,000 indie cosmetics brands in Korea. When it comes to skincare, there is no “one size fits all.”
Digital marketing: People have different skin types and most indie brands are sold online. This is where marketing via social media and leveraging the power of influencers or KOLs (key opinion leaders) comes into play. One can have a vicarious “try-me” experience by watching others use a product. After all, these indie brands cost a fraction of L’Oréal and Gen Zs are not afraid to try new products.

Product innovation, high quality, reasonable prices and product variety are enabled by K-cosmetics’ supply chain that has developed and grown over the years. Korea is home to the world’s largest cosmetics ODM (original design manufacturer), Cosmax Inc. (192820 KS), and Kolmar Korea Co. Ltd. (161890 KS) in the top five.

Cosmetics ODM is a picks-and-shovels business, making it less risky than investing in a particular cosmetics brand itself. Not surprisingly, there are a fewer number of ODMs compared to cosmetics brands. Playing an equally important role in the K-cosmetics supply chain, having the same business model, but in a more consolidated space, are container manufacturers.

Investment spotlight: Pum-Tech Korea

Pum-Tech Korea Co. Ltd. (251970 KS) in our portfolio is the largest cosmetics container ODM in Korea. As the name begins to insinuate, the company is known for its pump technology (tubes and other applications) and was the first to develop pump tubes in Korea in 2002. In 2009, not long after Amorepacific’s Air Cushion, Pum-Tech developed “Airless Compact” that utilized a small hole in the compact to control the amount of foundation per use and prevent contamination of foundation from air. The container for Shiseido’s roll-on sunscreen (“sun stick”) was also developed by the company.

Since its establishment in 2001, Pum-Tech has never had a down year in revenue driven by innovative products. The company owns approximately 5,000 stock moulds (in addition to custom moulds for specific customers), combinations among which offer customers containers of all sizes and shapes to choose from. The company currently serves over 500 brands globally, including L’Oréal, Estée Lauder and Shiseido. Pum-Tech’s manufacturing process boasts high levels of automation, and new capacity is expected to come online in H2 2025 and next year to meet increasing demand.

The Kondratyev cycle describes a tendency for global inflation – or the price level in earlier centuries – to reach major peaks / troughs every 54 years on average.

The highest peaks in global inflation in the first and second halves of the last century occurred in 1919 and 1974 respectively, suggesting another peak in the late 2020s.

US-centric analysts often wrongly place the last peak in 1980, as US annual consumer price inflation reached a higher high in that year. This was not true of a GDP-weighted average of CPI inflation rates across major economies, nor of US producer price inflation, which also reached a maximum in 1974.

Cycle troughs typically occur about two-thirds of the way through the interval between peaks, i.e. about 36 years after one peak and 18 years before the next. The annual change in global / US consumer prices reached a low in negative territory in 2009, consistent with this pattern and further supporting the expectation of a late 2020s peak.

Numerous commentators have drawn a parallel between recent / current US inflation experience and the early 1970s. Annual CPI inflation reached a post-Korean war high in 1969, fell back into 1972, then embarked on a bigger climb into the 1974 peak. The suggestion is that the rise into 2022 is the analogue of the late 1960s increase and another, bigger upsurge will unfold in 2026-27 – see chart 1.

Chart 1

Proponents of this view cite tariffs, large budget deficits and erosion of Fed independence as factors conducive to another inflation pick-up.

Current monetary trends, however, differ from the early 1970s, suggesting that such concerns are premature.

The 1967-69 inflation pick-up was preceded by a rise in annual broad money growth to above 10%. Fed rate hikes caused money growth to slump, pushing the economy into a recession in 1970. The Fed responded by fully reversing the increase in rates. Money growth surged into the mid-teens in 1971, laying the foundation for the 1972-74 inflation upswing – chart 2.

Chart 2

Fed tightening in 2022-23 also caused money growth to slump but the economy avoided a recession, resulting in a much more muted policy reversal. Money growth has recovered but only to a “normal” level by historical standards.

The monetary conditions for a second inflation rise into the Kondratyev peak, therefore, have yet to fall into place.

How could this change? One possibility is that lagged effects of policy tightening and tariff damage result in a recession and / or significant labour market weakness, triggering panic Fed easing that pushes money growth up further – a delayed 1970 scenario.

Alternatively, the Trump administration could wrest control of the Fed and push rates lower regardless of economic conditions.

A third possibility is that the Treasury increases monetary financing of the deficit, for example by relying on issuance of bills – mostly bought by banks and money funds – rather than notes and bonds.

The Kondratyev cycle is global so another scenario is that the monetary impulse for higher inflation comes from outside the US, for example through a combination of reflation in China and a further surge in already strong Indian money growth.

Large inflation swings, in either direction, often occur when policy-makers, and economic agents generally, are facing the “wrong” way (as was the case in 2020). The final ascent into the Kondratyev peak may require a recession / deflation scare first.

Recent Eurozone money trends cast doubt on economic optimism based on German / regional fiscal expansion. Weakening job openings suggest that a negative economic scenario is already starting to crystallise.

Six-month real narrow money momentum peaked in March at a modest level by historical standards, declining into June. The fall was driven by weakness in corporate deposits, suggesting that firms would cut back investment and hiring – see chart 1 and previous post for more discussion.

Chart 1

Indeed numbers on job postings are a timely coincident indicator of labour demand and appear to display less volatility than official survey-based measures of job openings or vacancies. The level and rate of decline of the UK Indeed series signalled recent job losses – chart 2.

Chart 2

The latest numbers show signs of stabilisation in the UK / US. By contrast, job postings in Germany and France are falling rapidly, with the Italian series breaking below its late 2024 low and even Spain rolling over.

The German / French results chime with elevated consumer expectations of a rise in unemployment – chart 3*.

Chart 3

Why haven’t ECB rate cuts and German fiscal expansion energised the Eurozone economy? The initial impact of the fiscal news has been to push up longer-term yields and the euro, offsetting ECB stimulus.

Fiscal expansion, even if well-executed, will play out over the medium term, with growth implications dependent partly on the extent of monetary financing. The direct and confidence effects of the unfavourable US-EU trade “deal”, meanwhile, are a further near-term negative.

*The Spanish series has been suspended.

MENA equity markets ended the second quarter of 2025 with returns of 1.3% for the S&P Pan Arab Composite LargeMidCap Index versus the MSCI Emerging Markets Index which was up 12.0% in the same period. For the year-to-date end of June 30, MENA markets were up 4.0% compared to 15.3% for emerging markets (EM).

The significant underperformance of MENA versus EM in the first half of the year should not come as a surprise. In our last letter, we flagged the risk of regional underperformance in a weak oil/weak USD environment that has characterised much of the first half of 2025. The under-indexation of MENA equities to the AI theme (a similar dynamic to what is observed in the underperformance of India equities this year) is another source of performance drag versus EM in the period.

Return dispersion among MENA equity markets is a desirable feature that we highlighted in previous letters and one that we feel is underappreciated by asset allocators. This dispersion allows us to step in and out of countries (on a relative basis) depending on our assessment of risk-reward in each. The first half provided a particularly good example of dispersion with a performance gap of ~25% between Kuwait (best performing) and Saudi Arabia (worst performing). Kuwait’s strong performance this year is being driven by increasing optimism on policy reform. However, our conversations with Kuwaiti companies in the last two months suggest a slower pace of execution, which is also visible in underwhelming earnings so far this year. Kuwait in 2025 is therefore likely to be a multiples expansion story that we believe has mostly played out. We therefore look for earnings growth in 2026 to support valuations or otherwise see scope for disappointment in the market.

In the interim, the market will still trade the headlines (particularly news on the mortgage law) and as a result we expect valuations to remain underpinned but not necessarily offering much upside.

The UAE also had an exceptional run that is extending into July and continues to stretch the performance gap with Saudi Arabia year-to-date. Fundamentals have largely supported the UAE-Saudi performance differential, as evidenced by comparing their respective banking systems’ loan-to-deposit ratio. UAE banks are leveraging their liquidity advantage to grow in the region, with an increasing share of their loan book growth attributed to Saudi Arabia.

Macro data appears supportive of the UAE and suggests an extension of a very strong three-year cycle well into 2025. While we acknowledge the strengths of the UAE macro story, we are wary of the stretched positioning in certain stocks and, as a result, have been gradually tilting the portfolio to end-of-cycle stocks that appear less crowded and thus offer a more attractive risk-reward. This has so far proven premature as the market continues to be emboldened by solid earnings growth and positive macro data. On the other hand, Saudi valuations present an opportunity to gradually build positions in companies we like with a 12-to-18-month view. We also see Qatar as a dark horse market this year, given relatively low levels of ownership amidst an effort by the regulator to prop up interest in its market.

In our last outlook statement, we discussed the impact of tariffs on the region. The conclusion then and now is that the region’s net import position with the United States will mitigate any direct negative impact, but that the indirect impact through a lower oil price can be significant. While peak tariff noise has largely subsided, we expect it to continue to be an area of tension as the pace of negotiations and deals accelerates. A possible change in strategy by OPEC+ also risks adding more supply to the market and can result in downside pressure on the oil price as we exit the seasonal peak summer demand. Our working assumption is that oil stays in the mid-$60s for the rest of the year; this is a level we consider to be a sweet spot for the region as it secures the funding of key viable projects while acting as a natural mitigant to unproductive capital and operating expenditures. Recent announcements on giga-project scope and feasibility reviews might be taken negatively by the market initially (most recently “The Line” project), but we believe this signals a commonsense approach to spending and resource allocation. Mid-$60s oil might have an impact on equity market sentiment in Saudi Arabia, but the offset to that is the valuation environment appears conducive for good stock pickers.

The primary reason tariffs took a backseat in the headlines in the second quarter was the unprecedented escalation in hostilities between Israel and Iran in June. MENA investors have long grappled with the prospect of direct strikes between the two countries with most (us included) placing this in the “low probability/high impact” risk bucket. As the events played out – and contrary to most expectations – MENA markets proved resilient, ending up at 1.7% over the 12 days of escalation. Brent oil briefly flirted with $82 on June 23 before settling back down to a range of $67-68 hours later. With the benefit of hindsight, markets were quick to recognise that Iran’s capacity to defend itself or launch retaliatory strikes was severely curtailed and as a result, swiftly discounted a prompt resolution to the events (paralleling an even stronger rally in Israeli equities over that period). While we do not rule out further escalation in the future, MENA equity markets passed a major stress test in June. In fact, a strong argument can be made that the political risk premium attached to the region (particularly GCC equity markets) is lower than at any point in their history.

We look forward to updating you on the strategy in the next letter.

The strategy focuses on investing in frontier and emerging market companies that our team expects will benefit from demographic trends, changing consumer behaviour, policy and regulatory reform and technological advancements.

Below, we explore several key factors that influenced returns during the second quarter of 2025 and share observations on the portfolio and the markets.

Internet and technology portfolio

The portfolio’s returns in the second quarter and throughout the first half of the year was primarily driven by the internet and technology sector. Key contributors included Fawry for Banking Technology & Payments S.A.E. (FWRY EG), Baltic Classifieds Group PLC (BCG LN) and Allegro.EU SA (ALE PW) which have been discussed in detail in previous letters. It is worth mentioning that Allegro shares benefited from a very strong Polish equity market backdrop this year with the WIG20 Index up ~30% in zloty terms as of end of June 2025. Fortunately, fundamentals have also been very supportive; expectations are for mid-teens EBITDA growth in 2025 and the company has allocated 4% of market capitalisation in share buybacks. The company’s decision to diversify its last-mile logistics (primarily parcel lockers) and reduce reliance on the dominant provider InPost can generate operational efficiencies and support margins if executed properly (for context, Allegro’s shares have outperformed InPost’s by 45% in constant currency since the announcement of Allegro’s new strategy in March this year). We also finally see a path to a clearing of the multi-year share overhang from private equity ownership as share sales are absorbed well by the markets, aided by passive index trackers which systematically react to increases in free float market capitalisation.

One drag in the internet and technology portfolio that is worth mentioning is Talabat Holding Plc (TALABAT AE), the leading food delivery and quick commerce company in the Middle East and Africa region. While we have reservations on the quality of food delivery business models, we found Talabat’s market penetration, diverse geographical dominance and valuation appealing. The company’s monetisation model impressed us; it generates 3.5% of gross merchandise value in advertising income (AdTech) and has built a healthy but competitive take-rate model from restaurant partners and consumers. Additionally, Talabat’s grocery offering (quick commerce) is the most developed we’ve seen among food delivery companies in the region with ~25% revenue contribution. We believe the market is overly concerned with competitive risks arising from the entry of Keeta (a Meituan company) into key Talabat markets like the UAE, Kuwait and Qatar. This has resulted in a fading of Talabat’s forward P/E ratio from ~18x at IPO last year to under 12x. This is a significant discount to domestic and global peers that are inferior on almost every metric. Talabat is a small position for the strategy and we acknowledge that the multiple is likely to be supressed until there is visibility on Keeta’s capabilities in its key markets. That said, we see a favourable risk-reward set up for the shares on the view that Talabat’s margins will exhibit resilience (relative to market expectations) in the next 12-18 months as Keeta enters the market.

Industrials portfolio

The industrials portfolio was a bright spot for the strategy with solid outperformance in the shares of Malaysian companies Westports Holdings Bhd (WPRTS KL) and Kelington Group Bhd (KGB KL).

Westports is a leading Malaysian port operator based in Port Klang, strategically located along the Straits of Malacca. It serves as a major gateway for container and conventional cargo for central Peninsular Malaysia and is one of the region’s key transshipment hubs, competing with the likes of Port of Tanjung Pelepas (PTP) and Port of Singapore. We acquired shares in Westports in the quarter as they came under pressure from concerns on slowing global trade from tariffs. Our thesis on Westports was that the volumes it handles will be relatively resilient given low exposure to Asia-US trade flow and relatively high exposure to gateway traffic (~50% of 2024 revenue are on containers destined to Malaysia as an end market). We also saw option value in the shares as the market was not pricing in a potential regulatory rate hike. Much to our delight, this was gazetted soon after we invested in the company and led to a significant upward revision of earnings across the street that supported the rally in the shares.

Kelington is a founder-led engineering solutions provider with a core competency in Ultra-High Purity (UHP) gas and chemical delivery systems for semiconductor, flat-panel display, solar and LED manufacturers. We purchased Kelington shares in the fourth quarter of 2024 and continued to build a position in the company as we got more familiar with the management team and the business model. We like Kelington for its UHP solutions business in particular; UHP systems are engineered networks that transport and regulate gases and chemicals used in semiconductor fabrication. These systems must maintain purity levels of 99.9999% (6N) or higher, as even microscopic contaminants can ruin wafers or reduce yield. We expect Kelington to be a major beneficiary of the “semiconductor sovereignty” theme and are bullish on its ability to capture that growth over the next few years.

The strategy experienced some underperformance (relative to the performance of the industrial portfolio) from TAV Havalimanlari Holding AS (TAVHL IS). TAV is a Turkish-listed airport operator and services company with a portfolio of 77 airports in 19 countries which it manages directly or through co-management agreements with industry partners. TAV shares came under pressure following the escalation in the Middle East in June as concerns over air travel and tourism mounted. We saw an opportunity to add to the shares after the US-mediated ceasefire was reached. We are relatively early in our ownership of TAV but are impressed with its track record and exposure to unique airport assets in regions that will experience long-term growth in air travel.

Healthcare and education portfolio

The healthcare and education portfolio had a good quarter led by Benefit Systems SA (BFT WA). BFT provides non-payroll employee benefit solutions with a strong focus on fitness, wellness and lifestyle service in its home market of Poland and several regional markets including Czechia, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Croatia and Türkiye. BFT is a play on the growth in wellness and corporate HR budgets. It dominates the Polish B2B wellness market with a base of ~1.7 million cards (~70% of the market). In addition to being a key customer acquisition channel for third-party fitness clubs, BFT operates its own network of over 240 clubs which helps it maintain healthy site utilisation, good user experience and a strong bargaining position vis-à-vis third-party clubs. BFT’s management has been vocal about its regional ambitions and followed that through this year with a ~USD430 million acquisition of Türkiye’s leading fitness club operator MACFit. BFT is betting that it can leverage MACFit’s 121 club network in Türkiye to build a B2B wellness card business that is similar to the one it built in Poland. While it is early days, the MACFit asset is highly profitable and allows the company time to thoughtfully develop its B2B business in the country. There was some corporate activity on the share registry of BFT in the quarter with the founder (who is no longer involved in the business) exiting his remaining ~14% stake in the company to a very healthy book of mainly local institutional investors. This resulted in improved liquidity on the shares with daily average traded value increasing to over USD3 million a day since the transaction was completed in March from the 2024 average of USD1.4 million.

Outlook

The investment environment continues to be volatile. Erratic policy making, a shifting geopolitical landscape and mixed signals about the health of the global economy still carry a lot of future uncertainty with them. On the other hand, corporate earnings appear healthy.

With the artificial intelligence theme firmly in play, fiscal spending is on the rise across much of the Western world and valuations are buoyed by a weak US dollar and expectations of monetary easing from whoever will be running the US Fed in the next 12 months.

As discussed in our last outlook, a weak US dollar is a net positive for most of our markets as it creates breathing room for central banks to cut rates without importing inflation through currency depreciation. We see that theme intact for the time being and as such, expect a supportive environment for valuations and corporate earnings growth.

At a micro level, we continue to be encouraged by the strong pipeline of ideas that we are generating and believe that signals a healthy environment for the strategy. More importantly, and as demonstrated in some of the company examples we gave earlier, the portfolio comprises unique, high-growth companies that we believe are under-owned in an EM equity context and have the potential to generate significant capital appreciation over time.

We look forward to updating you on the strategy in the next letter.

Building on insights from our prior research visits in 2023 and 2024, we returned to Warsaw this summer to assess how Polish companies are navigating the current economic and geopolitical environment. Over the course of a week, we conducted a series of reverse roadshows, meeting with corporate executives across sectors including consumer, real estate, infrastructure, industrials, health care, technology, media and gaming. Visiting companies in their own environments, rather than at conferences, gave us a more grounded view of their strategic focus, day-to-day operations and internal culture.

While Poland is often still viewed through the lens of its post-communist past, the reality on the ground tells a very different story. Today’s Poland is a modern, outward-looking EU economy, entrepreneurial, digitally driven and increasingly integral to regional supply chains and defence infrastructure.

What stood out this year was the visible progress in urban infrastructure. Warsaw continues to modernize, supported by EU-backed investment in roads, rail and public transit. The subway system is not only clean and efficient, but also notably safe. Highways are well-maintained, and we observed more active construction than in prior visits, particularly in residential projects. These developments reflect ongoing urbanization, with growing challenges around land availability further reinforcing housing demand.

On the macro front, Poland appears to be regaining its footing. Wage growth has outpaced inflation over the past two years, helping to restore purchasing power. Unemployment remains among the lowest in the EU, and the National Bank of Poland has implemented two rate cuts in 2025, with room for further easing. That said, while household balance sheets are healthier, consumers remain selective in their spending. Management teams across sectors described a more stable but cautious demand environment.

Overall sentiment was notably more optimistic than in prior visits. While risks remain (from labour shortages and EU fund disbursement delays to geopolitical uncertainty) most companies projected confidence in their positioning. Disruption in global trade flows and ongoing tariff negotiations between the EU and the United States were also cited as areas to monitor, though their immediate impact on domestic operations has been limited.

Several structural themes emerged from our conversations. First, consolidation continues to reshape the competitive landscape in Poland. This was particularly evident in diagnostics, fitness, convenience retail and residential development. Second, an increasing number of Polish companies are executing or planning regional expansions into Central and Eastern Europe, and even Western Europe, suggesting growing confidence, scale and ambition.

We were also encouraged by the practical adoption of artificial intelligence (AI). Rather than buzzwords, companies are deploying AI to improve efficiency, customer experience and decision-making. Use cases included radiology interpretation in diagnostics, store network optimization in retail, chatbot support and workflow tools in classifieds, targeting in digital advertising and content generation in game development. These deployments are already contributing to margin enhancement and productivity gains.

Anecdotally, one leading convenience chain noted that it is now the largest seller of coffee and pizza in Poland, a testament to how local champions are reshaping consumer behaviour and capturing everyday spend.

In our view, Poland continues to offer a depth of high-quality, bottom-up ideas. It combines structural EU support with entrepreneurial dynamism, accelerating technological adoption and rising regional ambition. Our research efforts allow us to identify hidden champions early and build conviction through firsthand engagement.

Budimex SA (BDX PW)

A position we initiated earlier this year, Budimex reflects several of the structural themes we observed on the ground: public infrastructure, disciplined execution and regional relevance. The company is Poland’s largest infrastructure contractor, playing a critical role in the country’s road, rail, military and energy-related construction projects. It benefits from NATO and EU certifications that enable participation in sensitive public tenders, particularly in the defence sector.

Budimex follows an asset-light model, maintaining in-house design and project management capabilities while outsourcing labour-intensive work. This structure enhances flexibility and allows the company to scale efficiently across diverse projects.

While Poland remains its core market, Budimex is also expanding its footprint across the region, with active operations in Germany, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and the Baltics. These markets offer infrastructure demand that fits with Budimex’s core competencies and represent a natural next step in its evolution.

Poland is undergoing a historic infrastructure transformation, supported by EU cohesion funds, national defence investments and long-term energy transition plans. Budimex’s strong execution track record, disciplined bidding strategy and established relationships with key government entities make it well-positioned to benefit from this cycle.

While the company has developed capabilities in infrastructure services and maintenance, it is currently evaluating the strategic direction of that segment.

Global (i.e. G7 plus E7) six-month real narrow money momentum – a key indicator in the approach followed here – recovered in June but remains below a multi-year high reached in March.

The June rise reflected a small rebound in nominal money growth combined with a further fall in six-month consumer price momentum, to its lowest since 2020 – see chart 1.

Chart 1

CPI momentum is now below its 2015-19 average, vindicating the “monetarist” forecast that global inflation would fully reverse its 2021-22 spike once the ridiculous – but thankfully temporary – policy-driven money growth surge of 2020-21 had passed through the system.

The rise in six-month real narrow money momentum into March suggested that global economic growth would strengthen into late 2025, following a weak start to the year related to a monetary slowdown into October 2024.

Front-running of US tariffs, however, may have supported growth during H1, with H2 payback liable to dampen the expected pick-up. The March peak in real money momentum, meanwhile, suggests economic deceleration from late 2025.

The June rise in global real money momentum was driven by a further pick-up in India following a dovish RBI shift coupled with a surprise rebound in the US. By contrast, Eurozone momentum slowed for a third month while UK contraction intensified, almost catching down to Japan – chart 2.

Chart 2

Interpretation of recent US money numbers is clouded by disruption to fiscal financing from the delay in lifting the debt ceiling. An associated run-down of the Treasury’s cash balance at the Fed may have supported H1 money growth, suggesting a drag as the balance is restored to its prior level.

(“Austrian” measures of the money stock include government deposits, on which basis US six-month narrow money momentum was negative in June. Such an approach is not endorsed here, for the obvious reason that – unlike for private sector agents – government money holdings are unrelated to future spending.)

Still, recent sideways movement of US six-month real narrow money momentum versus a slowdown in the Eurozone and outright weakness in Japan / the UK suggests improving US relative economic prospects while casting doubt on forecasts of further equity market underperformance.

UK monetary alarm bells are ringing louder.

Six-month growth of the preferred narrow money measure here – non-financial M1, comprising holdings of households and private non-financial corporations (PNFCs) – fell further in June, to just 0.1% annualised. Growth of its broad equivalent, non-financial M4, remained at 3.0%, below a 4.5% average over 2015-19, associated with beneath-target average CPI inflation – see chart 1.

Chart 1

Monetary warning signals are being ignored partly because official / consensus focus is on the Bank of England’s headline M4ex broad aggregate, which grew by 4.4% annualised in the six months to June – exactly in line with its 2015-19 average.

M4ex relative strength, however, reflects rapid expansion – by 14.1% annualised in the six months to June – of money holdings of “non-intermediate other financial corporations (OFCs)”, mainly attributable to increases in balances of securities dealers and fund managers. Such holdings are volatile and – unlike non-financial M1 / M4 – uncorrelated with future activity / prices*.

Six-month growth of M1 / M4 holdings of private non-financial corporations (PNFCs) fell further in June, to 1.4% / 0.4% annualised respectively. Household M4 growth firmed to 3.8% but M1 momentum moved into marginal contraction. The shift from sight deposits into time deposits and ISAs suggests weak spending intentions and a preference for saving – chart 2.

Chart 2

A previous post argued that falls in six-month non-financial M1 / M4 growth in April / May were partly payback for upward distortions related to portfolio adjustments before the October Budget and a front-loading of housing market activity ahead of the end of the stamp duty holiday. With such effects fading, ongoing monetary weakness is stronger evidence of overrestrictive policy.

*Correlations of the two-quarter rate of change of nominal GDP with two-quarter changes in money measures, lagged two quarters, over 1998-2019: M4ex +0.19, non-financial M4 +0.41, M4 of non-intermediate OFCs -0.08, non-financial M1 +0.65.

June money numbers cast doubt on ECB President Lagarde’s assertion that policy-makers – and by extension the Eurozone economy – are “in a good place”.

Six-month growth of the preferred narrow / broad money measures here – non-financial M1 / M3, comprising holdings of households and non-financial corporations (NFCs) – fell further to 3.4% and 1.6% annualised respectively last month. The latter is the slowest since December 2023 and compares with a 4.9% average over 2015-19 – see chart 1.

Chart 1

Weakness is focused on the corporate sector: NFC M1 / M3 deposits rose by only 0.5% and 0.1% annualised respectively in the six months to June, implying real terms contraction – chart 2.

Chart 2

Corporate liquidity deterioration suggests that companies are under increased financial pressure and will rein in expansion plans – chart 3. A contraction in UK real corporate money preceded recent employment cut-backs.

Chart 3

Six-month narrow money momentum is notably weaker in France / Italy than Germany / Spain, although German growth has fallen back since April – chart 4.

Chart 4

Consensus commentary focuses on bank lending, which, as an empirical matter, lags money trends. Adjusted loans to households and NFCs rose by a solid 0.4% on the month but six-month growth eased from 3.0% to 2.8% annualised. The “credit impulse”, in other words, may be rolling over.

Recent rate cuts are feeding through and it is possible that monetary weakness will prove temporary. Still, ECB officials should be concerned by the slowdown and signalling an openness to further easing rather than projecting complacency.