Yasaka Pagoda behind an alley in Higashiyama, Japan.

Japan has been quite cautious with pandemic control. Only on May 8, 2023 did the government downgrade COVID-19 to the same level as seasonal influenza. The country’s Q2 GDP grew 1.2% quarter-on quarter, outpacing market expectations, mainly driven by a rebound in exports and an increase in tourist arrivals. Japan boasts the world’s largest electronics industry and ranks third in automobile production. Real wages have turned positive for the first time in seven quarters and corporate appetite for investment was solid. 

In September, two of our team members participated in investment conferences and conducted company visits in Japan. Business operations in the country are back to normal. Inbound tourism is visibly booming. Making a reservation at a restaurant is a must. In August, about 2.2 million foreign visitors travelled to Japan, representing 85.6% of the visitors seen in the same month in 2019. For context, about 32 million foreign tourists visited Japan in 2019 and spent a record high of ¥4.8 trillion

Behind these short-term recovery signs, there are also indications of some long-term structural changes that lead us to believe that Japan is at inflection point and shifting from a deflationary to inflationary environment.  

Japan inflation rate 

These structural changes include: 

    1. Notable improvements in balance sheets. Historically, Japan’s prolonged deflation was triggered by the 1990s real estate bubble burst. This caused a credit crunch and a liquidity trap, essentially resulting in a balance sheet recession. Now, both property prices and corporate balance sheets have been on a consistent growth path.
    2. The Yield Curve Control (YCC), having faced challenges, is likely to be phased out in the coming months. Introduced in 2016 by the Bank of Japan (BOJ) to combat deflation, YCC’s objective was to maintain low yields to stimulate consumer and business spending. This approach worked well when inflation was low because investors could enjoy the safe returns of government debt. But with inflation eroding those gains since the spring of 2022, investors have started to sell government bonds, pricing in the chance of a near-term rate hike. To maintain this framework, the BOJ intervened by buying bonds, to little avail. In December 2022, the BOJ doubled the band to allow the 10-year yield to move 0.5% above or below zero. Nevertheless, the 10-year Japanese Government Bond yield recently rose to 0.805%, a decade high. Many economists now expect the BOJ to discontinue the YCC within the next six months. We agree with this view and think the next logical step is for the BOJ to raise its short-term policy interest rate from -0.10% to 0%, given that inflation, largely attributed to wage growth, seems persistent.
    3. Wages are on the rise again, a trend that should continue, driven by a severe long-term labour shortage. Japan may face a shortage of more than 11 million workers by 2040. Wage negotiations, particularly between major corporations and Rengo, also known as the Japanese Trade Union Confederation, are under close watch. The average wage hike was 3.58% in April 2023, the highest in three decades. For April 2024, the estimate is another hike of around 3%. 

Japan’s stock market has recently reached a peak not seen in 30 years, with the Nikkei 225 Index up 19% year to date. Warren Buffett’s investment in five Japan-based trading companies provided a vote of confidence, indicating Berkshire might own as much as 9.9% of each of these companies. Many investors are attracted by cheap valuations, the return of inflation and a depreciated yen. 

Early this year, the Tokyo Stock Exchange urged companies to boost their price-to-book (P/B) ratios. Half of the companies listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange trade at a P/B ratio of below one, compared with just 3% of firms on the S&P 500 Index. As highlighted earlier, businesses now have solid balance sheets, positioning them to enhance shareholder returns. In the fiscal year 2023, the dividends and share buybacks of companies on the Nikkei 225 were at record levels. 

Historically, Japanese small caps have outperformed large caps over the long term. However, since 2018, persistent macro uncertainties have swayed investors towards the relative stability of large caps.  

Japanese small caps outperforming large caps (through Aug 2023) 

Source: Nomura based on Nikkei 

We believe Japanese small caps are poised to outperform, mainly due to three reasons.  

  1. Historically, small caps outperform during economy expansions thanks to their better growth potential.  
  2. Small caps are expected to have accelerated profit growth in the fiscal year 2024. As of October 6, 2023, the EPS of MSCI Japan Small Caps is expected to rise by 11.6% compared to the 6.5% growth expected for its large peers. 
  3. Small-cap valuations are nearing historic lows compared to large caps, the biggest discount in 11 years. 

Source: Nomura, based on Toyo Keizai.

You may be curious about the impact of rising interest rates on our portfolio. Reassuringly, half of our Japan-based holdings are in a net cash position and the remainder carry low debt. A strong balance sheet has consistently been a key factor in our stock selection process. What’s more, to benefit from rising interest rates, this year we initiated a position in Concordia Financial Group (7189 JP), Japan’s third-largest regional bank, because we believe its growth will accelerate in a rising interest rate environment 

Amid Japan’s profound economic changes, we remain vigilant and adaptive, constantly refining our strategies and insights to help ensure that we navigate this evolving landscape in the best interests of our investors. 

Asian worker working in the steel market.

Following my trip to China in May 2023 and my recent commentary from June, I believe it is important to continue to share our thoughts on China, especially in light of recent disappointing economic developments and the new policy measures aimed at addressing its slowing economy.

Have we reached peak pessimism about China?

The real estate sector, along with its related industries, accounts for 20% to 30% of China’s GDP and has failed to rebound as expected. From January to July, real estate investment fell 8.5% year-on-year. Residential building areas deceased by 7.1% and total new construction areas declined by a quarter according to the National Bureau of Statistics.

China’s government has announced a slew of measures in the past few months to stimulate the sector, including:

  • Fiscal incentives: The Ministry of Finance on Aug. 18 extended personal income tax rebates for households upgrading their apartment until the end of 2025.
  • Mortgage easing: Banks no longer exclude those who have a repaid a mortgage from qualifying as first-time buyers if they don’t currently own a property. Big cities including Guangzhou and Shenzhen adopted this policy on Aug. 30.
  • Home-loan cuts: Starting Sept. 25, first-time homebuyers can renegotiate their mortgage interest rates, as announced by the central bank on Aug. 31.
  • Downpayment reductions: On Aug. 31, Beijing lowered the minimum downpayment ratio across the country to 20% for first-time homebuyers and 30% for second purchases.
  • Urban renewal: The State Council announced redevelopment support for older villages within mega cities. Metropolises including Shanghai and Guangzhou are following up.
  • Other measures: These include a nationwide cap on real estate commissions, allowing private equity funds to raise capital for residential property developments, pledging ¥200 billion (CDN$28 billion) in special loans to complete stalled housing projects and extending some of the 16-point plan to address liquidity issues in the sector.

We should soon find out if these measures prove adequate. The Mid-Autumn Festival from Sept. 29-30 followed by a week-long holiday from Oct. 1-6 for National Day is traditionally the busiest period of the year for real estate sales. But what if the bubble continues to deflate? Could it lead to a collapse contained within China or a long stagnation like Japan experienced? Or to something more globally damaging similar to the Great Financial Crisis of 2008?

Will China crash?

Contrary to these fears, we do not see a huge financial crisis in China. The country is a major creditor, most of its debts are in its own currency and the government controls all of the key banks.

The current risk is the elevated savings rate, which could weaken demand.

Is China’s economic situation a repeat of Japan in the early 90s?

China today and Japan 30 years ago share many similarities: high debt levels, an aging population and a property bubble pop after years of growth. But China’s asset bubbles are comparatively smaller. And, in some cases, one could argue that the US also is in bubble territory. The following table is quite telling:

  China US Japan
(1990 peak)
Property value/GDP 260% 180% 560%
Stock market/GDP 65% 151% 142%
Urbanization rate 65% 83% 77%
Debt/GDP 95% 122% 62%

Source: World Bank and IMF.

Is it all bad? Can China bounce back?

China’s economy was supposed to drive a third of global economic growth this year. Its recent slowdown is sounding alarm bells across the world. According to an International Monetary Fund analysis, when China’s growth rate rises by 1 percentage point, global expansion is boosted by about 0.3 percentage points. Asian economies, along with African countries have been most affected by diminished trade. For example, Japan reported its first drop in exports in more than two years in July after China cut back on purchases of cars and semiconductors. Central bankers from South Korea and Thailand last week cited China’s weak recovery as a reason for downgrading their growth forecasts. The value of Chinese imports has fallen for nine of the last 10 months as demand retreats from the record highs set during the pandemic. The value of shipments from Africa, Asia and North America were all lower in July than a year ago. But is the situation as dire as appears? Some indicators seem to tell a different story.

The price of oil is approaching $100. According to a September report by OPEC, global crude oil demand is expected to reach a record 102.06 million barrels per day in 2023, up 2% from 2022. Demand in China, the world’s second-largest crude oil consumer, is projected to grow by 6% to 15.82 million barrels, an upward revision of 50,000 barrels from August. Official customs data shows that China’s crude oil imports in August reached 52.8 million tons, up 21% from the previous month. This translates to a 31% year-on-year increase and a 25% rise over pre-pandemic levels in August 2019. With overseas travel from China still not back to pre-pandemic levels, further growth in demand for crude oil and petroleum products could be expected as noted by Dominic Schnider, UBS’s head of commodities and Asia-Pacific currency markets.

In terms of metals, China’s refined copper consumption was the second-strongest year to date in August, a month when demand would typically weaken due to hot weather. This was reflected in a 36.6% increase month over month in China’s copper concentrate imports in August.

China’s aluminium imports jumped 38.9% in August from a year earlier, customs data shows.  Imports of bauxite, a key raw material for aluminium, totaled 11.63 million tons last month, up 9% from the year prior. Bauxite imports in the first eight months of the year, at 96.62 million metric tons, were up 11.8% from a year earlier.

In our last commentary on China, we highlighted how it is trying to transition its economy away from real estate, infrastructure and exports to a more sustainable model led by domestic consumption, services and tourism. There is a lot of potential to unleash tremendous growth if Chinese consumers decide to increase their spending.

A study by the Australian Strategic Institute earlier this year showed that China leads in 37 of 44 tech fields, ranging from AI to robotics. China graduates 1.4 million engineers each year and leads the world in patent applications.

Source: World Economic Forum.

Technology fields and leading countries

Source: Australian Strategic Institute.

So, while there is a case for optimism, what if relations between China and its trading partners continue to deteriorate. What if trade barriers go up?

Who could replace China as a global economic engine?

Policymakers in the West may view a China slump as a geopolitical respite, but it raises a significant question: what are the global repercussions if China’s economy were to permanently stagnate?

According to World Bank data, China GDP grew by 263% between 2008 and 2021, while global growth was only 30%. China accounted for more than 40% of global growth during that period. Although some experts have pointed to India as a possible successor, it’s not a given. India’s manufacturing sector has contracted in recent years and private investment accounts for a smaller share of GDP than it did a decade ago.

Could this signal the end of global economic growth?

Global growth by period

1962-1973 5.4%
1977-1988 3.3%
1991-2000 3.0%
2009-2023 65%

Source: Capital Economics

We do not think the China growth story is over and believe the China pessimism is too extreme.

China digital display of stock market charts.

Summary

  • EM equities were down through the month, with Chinese equities continuing to drag.
  • Foreign investors dumped over US$3 billion of Chinese stocks through the month, despite better-than-expected retail sales figures (up 4.6% year on year) and industrial production numbers (up 4.5% year on year) for August.
  • Manufacturing PMIs also ticked up to 49.7 from 49.3 (above 50 points signals expansion).
  • New issues from Chinese banks also surged, beating expectations.
  • Industrials, staples and communications names in India outperformed wider EM, as did AI-linked semiconductor names in Taiwan and Korea.

Don’t look down

Is this the Wile E. Coyote over the canyon moment for markets? The delayed impact of vertiginous rate hikes across DMs on all maturing debt is now hitting consumption and investment. Yet central banks continue to talk tough and market pundits fret over the implications of “higher for longer rates.” It certainly feels like we are in a critical juncture for markets and the economy. Resilience of assets outside of fixed income appear out of step with the reality of higher rates and a weakening global economy, as illustrated by global PMIs falling for a fourth consecutive month.

Global Manufacturing PMI New Orders & G7 + E7 Real Narrow Money (% 6m). Source: Refinitiv Datastream.

Poor money numbers globally suggest that further economic contraction is likely. Despite this, central banks continue to talk tough on rates and many investors cling to hopes of a no landing/immaculate disinflation scenario unfolding, despite the cracks emerging in the global economy. 

Echoes of the GFC

Some market commentators are comparing the complacency in markets to the 2006-7 period where investors bought into the idea of a soft landing, just as the lagged effect of excessive interest rate hikes began to roll through the economy.

JP Morgan’s Marko Kolanovic was quoted in the UK’s Financial Times noting the magnitude of change in interest rates in this cycle is around 5x the increase over 2002-2008 (FT Alphaville: Is it good when Wall Street compares today to 2007?). Kolanovic also pulled archive strategy commentary from 2007 which speaks to some of the risks markets face today:

“The economy provides compelling evidence that it is more resilient than many had earlier believed. … [R]enewed momentum is confirmed as economic data over the balance of December 2006 and January 2007 show an economy shaking off the effects of higher interest rates and high commodity prices. Market participants give up the ghost on their hopes for easings, accept that the Fed has engineered a soft landing, and buy (literally) into the view that a Goldilocks economy is in the making. Economic growth is solid at around 3% and led by a reinvigorated consumer; the residential housing sector slowly stabilises; corporate earnings growth moderates but doesn’t collapse; and inflationary pressures ease off but do not dissipate. Risky assets trade at full valuations and remain in a narrow, low vol range. We’ll call this the “head fake” phase — everything feels too good to be true because it is. In case you didn’t notice, this is where we are right now.”

As the article notes, history tends to rhyme rather than repeat and the availability heuristic of taking short cuts through sketchy historical analogies to explain the situation today can lead investors astray.

Indeed, the 1970s were a far from perfect comparison to post-pandemic inflation – we were flagging last year that a crash in broad money numbers would see inflation rattle back and even undershoot in 2024 (see chart below). This forecast remains on track despite the anxiety over rising energy prices. In contrast, broad money (our primary leading indicator for inflation) remained persistently high in the 70s.

G7 & E7 Consumer Prices (% YOY). Source: Refinitiv Datastream.

In the pre-GFC era, central banks were signalling their commitment to keeping inflation in check while acknowledging that stresses in the system were starting to materialise. Talking tough today about “higher for longer” rate settings looks to us like the equal and opposite error to the excessively loose policy coming out of COVID lockdowns.

We question the widely held assumption that the global economy can muddle through without any shift in monetary policy in the months ahead. Our best bet is that global economic growth is likely to surprise to the downside in the next 3-6 months.

Green shoots

However, there is a silver lining. Unlike in 2007, most of the debt resides with governments and central banks rather than corporates and households. Price insensitive authorities can “extend and pretend”, socialising losses and thus providing some cushion to the impact of rate hikes. It may suggest why rapid rate increases haven’t yet bitten as hard as we initially expected.

Another positive trend (particularly for EM) is a likely bottoming in the global stock building cycle.

G7 Stockbuilding Cycle. G7 Stockbuilding as % of GDP (YOY change). Source: Refinitiv Datastream.

Excessively high inventories in industries from semiconductors to apparel have been in a clean out phase amid weaker consumer demand, which in turn puts downward pressure on commodities prices.

G7 Stockbuilding as & of GDP (YOY change) & Industrial Commodity Prices (% YOY). Source: Refinitiv Datastream.

Emerging markets provide the bulk of these goods and commodities, and will therefore benefit from a bottoming out of this downcycle in the next few months.

In Taiwan and Korea, we have seen semiconductor names rallying on reports that the sharp post-COVID inventory destocking cycle is approaching its end, and boosted by demand for high performance chips that power AI. In apparel, Nike recently reported a US$9 billion decline in inventories (down -10% year on year). Nike has up until now been forced to rely on discounts and promotions to clear inventory amid a period of subdued demand and higher competition from rivals like Adidas. Nike will now start to restock with new lines to be sold at higher prices, boosting profitability. Competitors are likely to follow suit, which collectively will boost EM companies that dominate the apparel supply chain.

The long term picture is bright for EM

While the near-term risks brought about by a global slowdown underpin our cautious positioning, there are compelling reasons to expect EM to outperform DM on the other side of this slowdown. Low inflation and higher rates in EM will open the door to rate cuts, while valuations and earnings are supportive. China looks oversold and could rally on more meaningful stimulus. Growth elsewhere, in Southeast Asia and countries like India, look set to outstrip their developed counterparts. As inflation continues to fall and the tightening cycle ends, global money numbers can revert into positive territory. This will be the key ingredient for an emerging market resurgence, as excess liquidity will flow to the superior fundamentals on offer in EM.

La Fondation CC&L est heureuse d’annoncer une contribution à la Société canadienne du sang, qui témoigne de son engagement envers la collectivité et qui a une incidence positive. En raison du succès de notre campagne de collecte de sang en août, nous tenons à remercier les participants qui ont appuyé cette importante initiative, menée par l’un de nos employés, Mohammad Shakeri.

Mohammad Shakeri est spécialiste au sein de l’équipe des opérations stratégiques du Groupe financier Connor, Clark & Lunn à Vancouver. Le don de sang est très important pour lui. Il en donne depuis dix ans et, comme plus de la moitié des Canadiens, ses proches et sa famille ont reçu des transfusions de sang dans le passé. Mohammad a fait la promotion de la collaboration dans le cadre de Partenaires pour la vie entre la Fondation CC&L et la Société canadienne du sang, en sensibilisant à ce service qui peut toucher tant de gens. Il s’agissait de la première activité de don de sang à CC&L au cours des dernières années et cette participation renforce notre engagement à l’échelle de l’entreprise à redonner aux collectivités dans lesquelles nous vivons et travaillons.

En bref

  • Chaque don de sang peut sauver jusqu’à trois vies.
  • Il faut parfois plusieurs donneurs pour sauver la vie d’un patient.
  • Comme chaque don de sang prend moins de 30 minutes, c’est un excellent investissement.

La demande de sang et de produits sanguins est constante. Nous vous encourageons à relever votre manche pour faire un don de sang en tout temps. Nous sommes participants actifs au programme Partenaires pour la vie et notre collaboration avec la Société canadienne du sang renforce notre engagement envers le soutien communautaire.

En savoir plus sur la Fondation CC&L.

Norwegian fish farm for salmon growing in natural environment.

Regulatory risk is nothing new to investors, but it has gained prominence in the current geopolitical climate. Companies globally, especially those with operations or manufacturing facilities in China, are  closely monitoring actions their government might take to undermine diplomatic relations. In the banking sector, the situation with SVB has led analysts to expect stricter regulatory frameworks for regional banks. Additionally, the ongoing Hollywood strikes have spotlighted AI as a contentious issue; actors are advocating for regulations that restrict studios from using their likeness for AI-generated content. And the list goes on.

In the 1990s and early 2000s, a laissez-faire attitude prevailed in developed countries, particularly in the US. It was the proof that the capitalist business model was sustainable, a perception supported by the slow pace of regulation during the quickly developing dotcom bubble and the pre-financial crisis housing market. In a hegemonic global environment, smaller nations found few reasons not to strategically align themselves with dominant powers, leading to accelerated deregulation in many developed countries. However, this framework began to shift as the US-led global world order faced challenges from competing political and economic ideologies.

As the US initiated a trade war with China and raised tariffs on various goods, many allied nations started reassessing their global trade strategies to safeguard their own economic interests. We believe the growing rift between the US and China will eventually force every government to choose sides and evaluate their dependencies on either power. Germany, for example, is reconsidering its longstanding industrial relationship with China and taking steps to reduce that reliance.

Enter the cycle of protectionism. The consequences of protectionism are well-documented: higher prices due to lack of competition, which leads to persistent inflation; weaker economic growth since international trade isn’t fully offset by domestic consumption, and a more fragile labour market as a result. When various stakeholders voice their discontent with a worsening economic environment, democratic governments often respond by enacting policies, introducing regulations or applying other short-term solutions in an attempt to alleviate the problems they created. These often penalize high-performing industries or companies and may involve levying taxes or setting price ceilings. Such changes catch both company management and shareholders off-guard.

Our clients know that Global Alpha uses a bottom-up approach to stock picking. However, our team also recognizes the increasing need in being risk aware about changes in regulatory frameworks, both at the industry and company levels.

A striking example occurred around this time last year with one of our holdings, Norway Royal Salmon (NRS). The Norwegian government unexpectedly announced a 40% tax rate on resources, which included salmon. Although the company had a solid business model and shareholder satisfaction was high, the stock dropped over 20% in a day, making it one of our worst performers for that quarter. Nevertheless, it was widely understood that NRS was set to merge with one of its competitors, Salmar. We believed this merger would provide for shareholders as it would create one of the largest players worldwide in fish farming and significant advantages, especially given that the larger entity could more effectively adapt to this new tax than smaller competitors. As of March 2023, the Norwegian government lowered its proposed tax rate to 35% to facilitate legislative approval, and we remain happy shareholders of Salmar.

Another recent case involves CVS Group (CVSG LN), a UK-based integrated provider of veterinary care. In early September, the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) announced its review of competitiveness in the veterinary sector, causing CVSG stock to drop more than 25%. Investors immediately assumed that CVS, as the largest player in the space, would be the review’s primary focus. However, our analysis suggests these concerns may be exaggerated. Reviews by the CMA do not always lead to material industry impacts, as shown by its review of UK grocers earlier this year. Furthermore, while CVS has been a major player in consolidating the UK veterinary industry, it has not led to unreasonable price hikes. Average increases for CVS products and services hover around 3% net, which is unlikely to be seen as an outlier. There are minor areas, like lack of transparency in cross-selling and customer awareness regarding chain ownership, where CVS might face some hurdles, but we do not anticipate a substantial impact on the business model.

Lastly, it is worth noting that regulatory and policy shifts can provide positive effects. The waste management industry is expected to benefit as recycling becomes increasingly crucial in creating more sustainable societies. Our portfolios include waste management companies like Casella Waste (CWST US) and Renewi (RWI LN). We expect that new recycling requirements across various commodities will improve margins in what has historically been a low-margin industry.

While no one on Global Alpha’s investment team is a policy expert, our job requires us to consider two important angles: the potential threats to a business model arising from policy shifts, and the actual impact on our investment thesis when a regulatory change happens. One reason for our cautious stance on AI investment opportunities is the level of uncertainty regarding when and how governments will implement regulations. Salmon farming and veterinary care may not capture the public imagination like AI does, but we are confident in our ability to navigate regulatory risks in these industries more successfully.

Photo of White River hydro project
White River Hydro Project, Ontario, Canada

Une occasion de favoriser les avantages mutuels et de soutenir le développement durable

Cet article a été initialement publié dans le numéro 33 du Journal of Aboriginal Management (JAM), dans le thème Infrastructures : Bâtir un avenir meilleur.


À PROPOS DE L’AUTEUR

Peter Muldowney.

Peter Muldowney
Chef, Stratégie institutionnelle à catégories d’actifs multiples, au sein du Groupe financier Connor, Clark & Lunn

Peter Muldowney est chef, Stratégie institutionnelle à catégories d’actifs multiples, au sein du Groupe financier Connor, Clark & Lunn, et il dirige l’initiative Échange stratégique du cabinet. M. Muldowney possède plus de 20 ans d’expérience dans les placements au Canada, aux États-Unis et au Royaume-Uni. Avant de se joindre au cabinet en 2011, il a commencé sa carrière comme consultant, dirigeant notamment deux des plus importants cabinets au Canada. En 2008, il est passé au secteur de la gestion de placement et a mis sur pied une nouvelle division de placement pour une société d’assurance canadienne. Peter Muldowney a terminé les 4 saisons de la réconciliation de l’Université des Premières Nations du Canada et a obtenu la Certification professionnelle en placements durables (CPPD) de l’Université Concordia en 2022.


 

La participation des Autochtones dans des projets d’infrastructures favorise l’autonomisation économique des communautés tout en contribuant à la réussite et à la durabilité globales des projets. Dans cet article, nous examinons certaines des façons dont les communautés autochtones peuvent participer aux investissements en infrastructures et nous soulignons les avantages que de tels partenariats peuvent créer.

L’investissement responsable nécessite la mobilisation inclusive des parties prenantes

Les projets d’infrastructures sont généralement des actifs corporels à grande échelle qui répondent à un besoin humain de base. Ces actifs sont essentiels au bien-être des communautés et au bon fonctionnement des économies locales. Les infrastructures englobent des projets comme les routes, les ponts, les écoles, les hôpitaux, la distribution et le traitement de l’eau, ainsi que la production et le transport d’électricité. L’aménagement et la construction de ces actifs nécessitent des investissements importants et l’apport de nombreuses parties prenantes. L’importance des projets d’infrastructure pour les communautés, leur nature à long terme et leur taille exigent une approche de placement responsable pour garantir et maintenir un permis social d’exploitation.

La mobilisation des parties prenantes joue un rôle crucial, car elle fait en sorte que les placements intègrent un large éventail de perspectives et produisent des résultats positifs. En fin de compte, l’investissement responsable consiste à produire des rendements financiers tout en tenant compte de l’incidence plus générale sur la société et l’environnement. Une approche inclusive de la mobilisation est essentielle pour garantir que toutes les parties concernées sont consultées.

On reconnaît de plus en plus l’importance d’inclure les peuples autochtones en tant que parties prenantes essentielles dans les projets d’infrastructures, en veillant à ce que leurs droits, leur patrimoine culturel et leurs intérêts économiques soient respectés et soutenus. Cela est particulièrement important dans des pays comme le Canada, où de nombreux projets d’infrastructures ont un impact direct sur les terres et les territoires des Autochtones, ainsi que sur leurs peuples et leurs communautés.

Cette sensibilisation accrue, combinée à une plus grande volonté d’inclusivité de la part des gouvernements et des entreprises, devrait contribuer à accroître la participation des Autochtones à l’aménagement responsable de nouveaux projets d’infrastructures durables au Canada. Toutefois, il est important que ces efforts soient axés sur le désir d’une véritable compréhension des points de vue et des priorités des Autochtones, ainsi que sur l’établissement d’une relation authentique qui vise à atteindre un avantage mutuel. Une telle approche favorise la transparence tout en encourageant la collaboration et la recherche de consensus, qui peuvent améliorer la prise de décisions et les résultats.

La collaboration favorise les avantages mutuels et le développement durable

Les partenariats positifs offrent une voie prometteuse vers des occasions d’investissement plus inclusives qui facilitent l’autonomisation économique des communautés autochtones et appuient l’aménagement, la construction et l’exploitation de projets d’infrastructures durables et de grande qualité.

La participation accrue des Autochtones peut contribuer aux efforts de réconciliation en encourageant le développement des entreprises autochtones, l’autodétermination et des résultats socioéconomiques positifs. Les flux de trésorerie réguliers générés par les investissements en infrastructures peuvent fournir aux partenaires autochtones des fonds pour répondre à un grand nombre d’objectifs : logement, soins de santé, éducation, installations récréatives, centres communautaires, développement économique, revitalisation culturelle, ou tout ce que la communauté valorise et priorise.

La mobilisation des communautés autochtones contribue également à protéger la valeur des investissements dans les infrastructures : elle atténue certains risques, permet d’éviter ou de résoudre promptement les conflits et les problèmes juridiques et rend l’aménagement et l’exploitation des projets plus fluides et efficaces.

Scott Munro, chef de la direction adjoint du Conseil de gestion financière des Premières Nations, l’a bien souligné dans son article sur l’évolution des normes ESG (JAM 32) : « La manière dont une entreprise prend en compte et respecte les droits des Autochtones déterminera l’impact sur sa valeur d’entreprise. Si l’entreprise ne peut montrer aux investisseurs et aux prêteurs qu’elle a obtenu le consentement libre, préalable et éclairé des peuples autochtones touchés par un projet, aussi bien intentionné et avantageux qu’il soit, le conflit sera inévitable. Le projet pourrait être retardé ou prêter le flanc à un litige coûteux, et l’entreprise fera face à une atteinte à sa réputation et à des actionnaires mécontents. »

En plus d’atténuer certains des risques associés aux projets d’infrastructures, la participation active des communautés autochtones dès les premières étapes de la planification des projets apporte des connaissances et des perspectives locales précieuses. Les communautés autochtones connaissent très bien leurs terres, leurs ressources et leurs pratiques traditionnelles. Ces perspectives contribuent à améliorer la conception des projets, à approfondir les connaissances dans les domaines d’importance archéologique, à gérer durablement les ressources, à préserver la biodiversité et à réaliser des évaluations d’impact environnemental plus robustes, tout en favorisant une surveillance et un entretien efficaces de l’environnement.

La collaboration accroît la durabilité des projets et renforce les efforts d’intendance en intégrant les perspectives et les pratiques autochtones qui se sont avérées respectueuses de l’environnement et résilientes au fil des générations. Elle peut mener à des résultats plus fructueux, tant pour le projet que pour les communautés concernées, en promouvant la collaboration, la confiance et la prospérité partagée.

Des occasions pour les Autochtones dans les infrastructures

Les collectivités autochtones peuvent participer à un projet d’infrastructures de différentes façons. Elles peuvent le faire directement par le biais d’une participation en actions, d’un partage des revenus ou d’une autre entente mutuellement avantageuse, ou encore d’une participation moins directe comme un placement dans une entreprise d’infrastructures publique ou un fonds d’infrastructures privé.

Le plus souvent, la participation est officialisée au moyen d’une entente négociée sur les avantages qui régit la relation entre la communauté autochtone et le projet d’infrastructures. Ces ententes énoncent les avantages et la rémunération spécifiques que la communauté autochtone recevra en échange de son soutien ou de son consentement à un projet, en veillant à ce que ses intérêts soient codifiés et reconnus dans le cadre des activités courantes du projet. Les ententes fructueuses facilitent la consultation et l’approbation de la communauté en tenant compte de ses objectifs sociaux, économiques et environnementaux, tout en assurant une distribution équitable des coûts et des avantages du projet. Les avantages peuvent comprendre la rémunération financière, des possibilités d’emploi, la formation professionnelle et les initiatives de développement communautaire.

La participation en actions permet à la communauté autochtone de participer directement aux facteurs économiques des investissements en infrastructures. En ayant une participation dans un projet, les communautés reçoivent des profits et prennent part à certains aspects du processus décisionnel. Les ententes de partage des revenus sont une autre façon pour les communautés autochtones de partager les profits générés par un projet d’infrastructures et peuvent constituer une importante source de revenus. Ces deux types d’ententes peuvent renforcer leur économie, favoriser la création d’emplois et améliorer l’accès aux ressources.

En plus des participations en actions et des paiements de redevances, on peut envisager d’autres ententes mutuellement avantageuses. Il est important de reconnaître que les besoins, les valeurs et les ambitions de chaque communauté autochtone sont uniques de la même façon que chaque projet d’infrastructures est distinct. Bien qu’il y ait des avantages à tirer parti de l’expérience passée et des pratiques exemplaires, il n’existe pas d’approche universelle. Chaque discussion doit s’amorcer dans le respect de la communauté autochtone et la volonté de dialogue ouvert qui aboutissent à une entente et à une collaboration productive.

Accent mis par CC&L Infrastructure sur la valeur partagée et les partenariats solides

CC&L Infrastructure investit dans des infrastructures présentant un profil risque-rendement attrayant, une longue durée de vie et la possibilité de générer des flux de trésorerie stables pour une clientèle très diversifiée : fiducies autochtones, fonds de pension publics et privés, sociétés d’assurance vie, institutions financières, fondations et fonds de dotation, particuliers fortunés, etc.

En tant que propriétaire d’actifs à long terme et intendant du capital de ses clients, CC&L Infrastructure se concentre sur la gestion responsable de ses actifs, qui comprend une approche systématique de l’évaluation des facteurs environnementaux, sociaux et de gouvernance. Nous croyons que cette approche améliore notre capacité à gérer le risque, protège la valeur de nos placements et bonifie le rendement des placements à long terme.

Notre société collabore depuis longtemps avec des partenaires autochtones. Il y a plus de 15 ans, nous avons collaboré avec les Premières Nations locales lors de notre premier investissement; aujourd’hui, nous coopérons d’une façon ou d’une autre avec les communautés autochtones pour plus de la moitié des actifs d’infrastructures canadiens en portefeuille. Il s’agit notamment de plusieurs installations hydroélectriques au fil de l’eau et projets d’énergie solaire dans lesquels nos partenaires autochtones détiennent une participation directe à nos côtés.

CC&L Infrastructure est membre du Groupe financier Connor, Clark & Lunn Ltée, une société de gestion de placements détenue par ses employés, dotée d’une structure multientreprise et dont les sociétés affiliées gèrent collectivement un actif de plus de 188 milliards de dollars canadiens.

This is the first of a series of short posts focusing on whether incoming economic news supports or contradicts the forecast of a global “hard landing” suggested by monetary trends. 

Flash results suggest that the global composite PMI new orders index – a timely indicator of demand momentum – fell for a fourth month in September, consistent with the monetary signal of a slide into early 2024, at least. 

The flash results, available for the US, Japan, Eurozone, UK and Australia, imply a decline through 50 to the lowest level since December, assuming no change in all other countries in the global aggregate – see chart 1. 

Chart 1

Chart 1 showing Global Composite PMI New Orders & G7 + E7 Real Narrow Money (% 6m)

Weakness in the flash surveys was driven by a further slowdown in services new business, with manufacturing new orders little changed – chart 2.

Chart 2

Chart 2 showing Global PMI New Orders / Business

Any hopes of manufacturing stabilisation, however, may be dashed by full September results incorporating China and other emerging economies. The equity analysts’ earnings revisions ratio correlates with Chinese manufacturing PMI new orders and weakened sharply this month – chart 3. 

Chart 3

Chart 3 showing China NBS Manufacturing PMI New Orders & IBES China Earnings Revisions Ratio

Renewed deterioration in Chinese / Asian manufacturing is also suggested by the Korean FKI survey for September, showing a relapse in the assessment of business prospects to the weakest since February – chart 4.

Chart 4

Chart 4 showing Global Manufacturing PMI New Orders & Korea FKI Manufacturing Business Prospects
A young kitten rubbing up on her adopted mama dog,

The profound and enduring love people feel for their pets is a testament to the unique and cherished bond between humans and animals. Across cultures, generations and geographies, this affection runs deep and is driving unprecedented demand for high-quality pet care, products and services. There is no doubt that pets occupy a special place in our hearts. But should they also occupy a special place in your investment portfolio?

When it comes to investment strategy, recognizing the remarkable growth within the pet industry is paramount. At Global Alpha, our preference is to invest in large and growing markets, and the pet industry perfectly aligns with this approach. As part of our meticulous investment process, it is essential to delve into the underlying factors propelling this industry’s expansion, as these drivers often vary by theme – such as demographics, innovation and environment.

How big is the pet market in North America?

As of 2023, data from the American Pet Products Association reveals that pet ownership in the United States has reached a remarkable milestone, with 66% of households, equivalent to 86.9 million homes, proudly welcoming pets into their lives. This figure marks a substantial increase from the 56% recorded in 1988, underscoring the enduring trend of pet ownership. So, how important are these pets to their owners? An astounding 85% of dog owners and 76% of cat owners affirm that their pets hold a special place as bona fide members of their families.

In 2022, Americans alone spent $136.8 billion on their pets. Back in 1996, that number was just $21 billion. Even more fascinating is that millennials comprise the highest percentage (33%) of pet owners in the US, followed by Gen X at 25% and baby boomers at 24%.

In Canada, pet industry spending reached $12.9 billion in 2022, up a whopping 486% from $2.2 billion in 1994 according to Statistics Canada.

How is the pet market different internationally?

While the US is the clear leader when it comes to spending on pets, other countries are also seeing the market grow. In the UK, the vet market is worth more than £2 billion ($2.5 billion USD) with almost two thirds of households owning a pet.

China has become the second-largest market, even though only 23% of Chinese households have pets. China’s pet industry is expected to reach $66.1 billion by the end of this year, which is 10 times the size it was a decade ago. 

At the same time, there are more than 31 million pets in India and this number is growing at an annual rate of over 12%. According to a Bonafide Research report, India’s pet care industry is expected to reach close to a billion dollars by 2025, with a CAGR of more than 19%.

How have our pet industry holdings performed?

Since inception in 2008, we have continuously maintained exposure to the animal health industry. Below are a few highlights.

VCA Antech: Profiled in our February 28, 2012 weekly

  • Founded in 1986, VCA Antech is a leading animal healthcare services company
  • The company provides lab testing for over 17,000 animal hospitals with over 30,000 veterinarians
  • Provided exposure to animal hospitals and pet diagnostics
  • Exited in Q2, 2016 as the market cap crossed the upper limit of the benchmark – the company was acquired by Mars in September 2017

Heska:

  • HSKA is a veterinary diagnostic company
  • It has 162 US patents and 139 foreign-issued patents
  • Provided exposure to veterinary diagnostics
  • Exited in Q1, 2017 as it had reached our fair value

Greencross: Highlighted in our June 3, 2016 weekly

  • Australian pet health company, founded in 1994
  • Number one pet care specialist in Australia, providing both retail and veterinary services
  • Provided exposure to animal clinics and pet retail stores
  • Exited in Q1, 2019 as it was acquired by private equity group, TPG Capital

Our current exposure to the pet industry

We are currently invested in UK pet health company, CVS Group. Founded in 1999, the company went public in October 2007.

Business overview

Headquartered in Norfolk, CVS is one of the leading veterinary services providers in the UK with about 10% market share. As of 2022, CVS has about 500 practices across its three markets, including eight specialist referral hospitals and 37 dedicated out-of-hours sites. The company also runs three laboratories, seven crematoria and an online retail business called Animed.

CVS recently entered the Australian market with a small number of acquisitions, bringing the total number of practices outside the UK to 35.

Target market

The total addressable market in the UK for veterinary products and services is over £2 billion. The market consists of six large chains and a number of independent/small chains representing 45% of the market.

On the other hand, according to IbisWorld, Australia has a $5.3 billion addressable market which is growing at 6% per annum. The level of consolidation in the Australian market is just 20% when compared to the UK, adding for future potential growth via M&A.

Competitive advantages

  • Largest and most comprehensive provider of vet services in the UK, meeting all customer needs
  • Scale – has developed shared facilities and opportunities to cross sell its products, like lab testing, generic medicines, loyalty schemes, specialist surgeries and pet cremation

Growth strategy

  • Consolidate large-animal vet practices (delivering equine & livestock care), which is more fragmented
  • Their laboratory diagnostic business could enter the farm animal diagnostics market
  • International expansion continues like their latest entry in Australia

Where we’re looking next?

We have our eyes on a few interesting companies operating in the animal health space, ranging from pet insurance and fresh pet food to a diagnostics company. Our ability to be highly selective and nimble in our portfolio holdings leaves us well-positioned to add some exposure to the animal health industry at attractive valuations.

So just one question remains: How much are you spending on your pet?

The Godil family cat

Global six-month real narrow money momentum is estimated to have broken to a new low in August, reinforcing pessimism here about economic prospects and casting strong doubt on now widely-held “soft landing” hopes. 

Real money momentum bottomed in July 2022, recovered during H2 but suffered a relapse in early 2023, retesting the 2022 low in April. The relapse has been reflected in a renewed downswing in economic momentum, as proxied by global composite PMI new orders – see chart 1. 

Chart 1

Chart 1 showing Global Composite PMI New Orders & G7 + E7 Real Narrow Money (% 6m)

A tentative stabilisation of real money momentum over the summer suggested that PMI new orders would bottom out around year-end. The further move down in August, if confirmed, signals deeper and more extended economic weakness. 

The August estimate is based on monetary data covering 70% the global (i.e. G7 plus E7) aggregate and near-complete CPI results. 

The suggested fall to a new low reflects both additional nominal money weakness and an oil-price-driven recovery in six-month CPI momentum – chart 2. 

Chart 2

Chart 2 showing G7 + E7 Narrow Money & Consumer Prices (% 6m)

The ongoing oil price rally suggests a further near-term rise in headline CPI momentum – chart 3. A core slowdown, however, is expected to continue and may accelerate as higher oil costs squeeze spending on other items. 

Chart 3

Chart 3 showing G7 + E7 Consumer Prices & Commodity Prices (% 6m)

The further fall in real narrow money momentum has been driven mainly by China and India – chart 4. An earlier post attributed Chinese monetary weakness to misguided policy tightening in late 2022, which has since been partially reversed. Chinese August money numbers suggest greater damage from the misstep than previously assumed, implying a more urgent need for additional policy easing. 

Chart 4

Chart 4 showing Real Narrow Money (% 6m) Early Reporters

An August estimate of global industrial output is not yet available but a large negative differential between six-month rates of change of real narrow money and output is likely to have persisted – chart 5. 

Chart 5

Chart 5 showing G7 + E7 Industrial Output & Real Narrow Money (% 6m)

As previously noted, global equities have underperformed cash since this differential turned negative in early 2022 (allowing for reporting lags), despite a rally over the last 12 months. 

Why was weakness compressed into the first nine months of 2022, with a subsequent strong rebound? 

One explanation is that the Ukraine invasion and associated immediate further upward pressure on energy prices exaggerated the market response to monetary deterioration. Positioning and sentiment reached oversold extremes in late 2022, creating the potential for a relief rally as energy markets adjusted and prices fell back. 

Another possibility – admittedly difficult to assess – is that the “excess” money backdrop has been less unfavourable than suggested by the six-month momentum differential shown in chart 5, because of the existence of an overhang from the 2020-21 monetary surge. An excess stock of money, in other words, may have persisted despite the flow turning negative. 

The ratio of the stock of real narrow money to industrial output has trended higher over time, with the increase reflected in rising real asset prices and wealth – chart 6. 

Chart 6

Chart 6 showing Ratio of G7 + E7 Real Narrow Money to Industrial Output* & 2000-19 Log-Linear Trend *Index, June 1995 = 1.0

A huge overshoot in 2020-21 has been correcting since late 2021 but the ratio was still above its pre-pandemic trend at end-2022, i.e. the negative flow differential had not fully offset the prior period of excess.

The stock and flow signals, however, are now aligned: the real money / output ratio moved below trend in early 2023 and its July level was the lowest since February 2020 before the policy response to the pandemic and subsequent monetary surge.

NASA image of a huge hurricane between Florida & Cuba.

This week, Global Alpha is looking at the increased frequency of natural disasters and how climate change is affecting the insurance industry.

The recent wildfires in Hawaii, the deadliest in over 100 years, is the latest in a long line of severe natural disasters. The town of Lahaina was hardest hit as damage assessment maps indicate over 2,200 buildings were destroyed or suffered some harm. Rebuilding Lahaina has been estimated to cost $5.5 billion.

Just this past Friday, a significant earthquake registering 6.8 on the Richter scale shook Morocco, leading to early estimates of over 2,800 casualties and causing severe damage to historic sites in Marrakesh. This comes after an event in February this year when Turkey and Syria were hit by an earthquake measuring 7.8 on the Richter, followed by aftershocks reaching up to 7.5. In that catastrophe, thousands of buildings collapsed, resulting in thousands of injuries and tens of thousands of deaths. It became the deadliest global disaster since 2010 and ranks as the 11th deadliest event in recorded history. Beyond the loss of life, financial assessments from the government of Turkey, the World Bank, the UN and the EU estimate the economic loss at around $91 billion, making it the 11th most costly disaster globally, after adjusting for inflation. Both events have underscored the need for stricter enforcement of modern building codes. In Syria and Turkey, a number of the buildings that fell, including newer multi-story residential structures, should have had sufficient structural integrity to mitigate significant fatalities.

Closer to home, there has been an extended period of wildfire activity across many Canadian provinces. While many of the wildfires occurred in remote regions far from major population centres, total insured losses are expected to reach several hundred million dollars and thick smoke caused hazardous air conditions in the Northeast. In June, New York and Montreal both recorded the worst air quality in the world.

Overall, the first half of 2023 experienced the highest economic impact from catastrophes since 2011, and the fifth highest on record, with the highest ever number of at least $1 billion insured loss events (18 versus the historical average of 7).

The end result is that insurers are choosing to limit exposure in some markets. Reinsurance companies are raising their rates to insurers to help cover losses above certain levels. These higher rates get passed on to consumers and other insurance buyers. Recently, State Farm and Allstate announced they are no longer providing insurance in California, the most populated US state. Reasons for their withdrawal include increased catastrophe exposure, construction costs and the reinsurance market. A similar situation is unfolding in hurricane-prone Florida, where property insurance costs are skyrocketing and Farmers Insurance pulled out of the state altogether, citing increased risk exposure.

Global Alpha holds two insurers: RLI Corp. (RLI.US) and Vienna Insurance Group (VIG.AV).

RLI is a specialty insurance company with more than 50 years of experience serving the property, casualty and surety markets. RLI focuses on niche markets that need deep and unique underwriting expertise. The company operates on both an admitted and non-admitted basis with exposures predominately in the US. RLI had some exposure to the Hawaiian wildfires primarily due to homeowner insurance in the state and recently announced its loss estimates. Although preliminary in nature, RLI estimates pretax net catastrophe losses of $65 million to $75 million related to 200 structures. These losses will be reflected in Q3-2023 results. RLI regularly monitors and attempts to manage exposure to catastrophes by limiting concentrations of locations insured to acceptable levels and by purchasing reinsurance. Catastrophe exposure models can help assess risk, but are inherently uncertain due to the sporadic observations of actual events.

Vienna Insurance Group offers insurance solutions in the property and casualty, life and health business across approximately 30 countries in Central and Eastern Europe. Vienna has a climate change strategy that provides general principles for dealing with climate change and guidelines for investments and insurance operating business. One of the first initiatives was to eliminate investments in the coal sector and significantly limit insurance coverage for new coal mining and coal-fired power plant projects. The company’s scenario analysis highlights the main natural risks as flooding, winter storms and summer (hail) storms. Science is expecting the risk of flooding and hailstorms to increase. The 2021 flooding in Bernd, Germany led to unexpectedly large losses while the same year also saw severe hailstorms in Austria and a tornado in the Czech Republic. As for winter storms, the risk is expected to increase in some countries and decrease in others. Vienna offers insurance coverage in Turkey, albeit in the less affected western part of the country. Nonetheless the company announced an expected gross impact (including active reinsurance) of €170 million.

The world is currently observing a warmer El Nino phase that often leads to shifting rainfall patterns in different parts of the world. For example, more flood-related losses have been reported in Europe, the Middle East and Africa during El Nino phases. Insurance companies have always been concerned with potential losses due to natural risks. Global warming is highlighting the critical nature of this problem. As we confront a world where the frequency and severity of natural events are exacerbated by climate shifts, the question becomes: are insurance models robust enough to adapt, or will we find ourselves financially unprepared for the evolving landscape of risk?