Close-up image of an electronic circuit board.

Our Emerging Markets team attended a series of corporate meetings at a technology conference in Taipei last week. During these meetings, one topic kept emerging: as semiconductors become more advanced and complex, the importance of testing them is growing rapidly. This theme appeared consistently across our meetings, including with companies involved in probe cards, system-level testing and metrology. As the current AI-driven arms race accelerates investment in high-performance computing, testing has become a foundation for semiconductor reliability.

For many decades, progress in semiconductors came from shrinking transistor size and fitting more of them onto each chip. But as Moore’s Law approaches its physical limits, chip designers are increasingly turning to advanced packaging to continue pushing performance forward. This approach helps sustain technological momentum but also introduces new challenges and more potential points of failure. That is why semiconductor testing matters more than ever.

Modern semiconductors must now be tested at several points during a complex fabrication process. At the wafer level, testing examines individual dies (individual chips on a wafer) to determine which are viable before sending the wafer to subsequent steps. This is critical because the packaging stage adds significant dollar value, and if a defective die is mislabeled as good, the cost of assembling it into an advanced package can be substantial.

Once a chip enters packaging, it undergoes final electrical and functional testing, which confirms that the packaged device is assembled correctly and works as intended. A growing number of AI accelerators also require burn-in testing, where devices are stressed under elevated temperature and voltage to screen for early-life failures.

Finally, system-level testing validates each device under real-world operating conditions. As AI processors draw more power and generate more heat, system-level testing has become one of the most critical stages of the entire test flow.

In a sense, modern chips now go through the semiconductor equivalent of an endurance triathlon: wafer-level tests, post-packaging reliability tests (including burn-in) and finally system-level verification. Each stage is designed to catch a different type of failure and skipping even one dramatically increases the risk of defects later in the cycle.

Importantly, the most advanced AI accelerators require far more testing, nearly doubling test time and test content relative to previous generations. It is also why AI chips are now 100% tested, unlike many consumer electronics where sample testing remains common. As one management team noted in a meeting, “reliability can no longer be assumed; it must be verified.”

The economics of chip failure have also changed dramatically. Today’s AI accelerators are among the most expensive devices ever produced. A single AI server rack powered by NVIDIA chips can cost around USD3.5 million. One faulty component can compromise the entire system. Meanwhile, testing typically represents only about 2-3% of total chip cost, yet it protects assets worth millions. This asymmetry also explains why switching test solution providers mid-generation is rare: the potential savings are small, while the risks are substantial. Robust testing has therefore become a form of value protection.

Taiwanese testing companies are uniquely positioned because they operate in close proximity to TSMC, which today manufactures virtually all of the world’s most advanced chips, and within a rich ecosystem of its partners. Supported by deep engineering expertise, this environment enables tight co-development of testing solutions aligned with the industry’s most advanced semiconductor processes.

Among the firms we met at the conference were two companies we own in our Emerging Markets portfolio, both of which illustrate how we leverage this theme in practice.

MPI Corporation (6223 TT)

MPI provides tools used for wafer-level testing, particularly probe cards with fine needle-like contacts that touch each die on a wafer to verify it functions before packaging. The company is a key supplier of customized, high-performance probe cards for ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits) used by hyperscalers.

As AI and advanced packaging increase chip complexity, wafer-level testing now requires more precise and specialized probe card designs. This is contributing to rising unit sales and higher prices for MPI’s solutions. The company has also been enjoying sustained market share gains, supported by its ability to offer superior customization, short lead times and close integration with customers early in the chip design process. These strengths position MPI well for structurally rising test intensity across next-generation logic and AI devices.

Chroma ATE Inc. (2360 TT)

Chroma complements the theme at the opposite end of the test flow. The company is a global leader in system-level testing, power-testing equipment and metrology tools. As chips become more power-hungry and thermally constrained, ensuring reliable performance under real operating conditions becomes essential. Chroma’s solutions support both the growing energy demands of data centres and the precision requirements of advanced packaging.

As semiconductor complexity rises and Moore’s Law slows, innovation is increasingly shifting to packaging, integration and system design. Testing is what bridges that complexity with reliable performance. MPI and Chroma play important roles in this ecosystem. As fundamental investors focused on quality and growth durability, we view testing as a structurally growing and increasingly critical part of the semiconductor landscape.

In our view, testing matters.

Graphique du partenariat entre Gestion de placements CC&L et l'Office d'investissement du RPC.

Gestion de placements Connor, Clark & Lunn (Gestion de placements CC&L) est heureuse d’annoncer l’étude de cas sur l’Institut sur les données d’Investissements RPC, qui met en lumière son partenariat durable avec Gestion de placements CC&L. Au cœur de notre partenariat se trouve l’engagement à l’égard de la recherche et du développement continus sur les placements quantitatifs à l’échelle mondiale.

Depuis 2004, Gestion de placements CC&L est un partenaire de confiance d’Investissements RPC. L’étude de cas décrit l’évolution de cette collaboration, qui est passée d’un mandat novateur superposant des positions acheteur et vendeur d’actions à une stratégie quantitative sophistiquée d’actions mondiales.

Investissements RPC a effectué son placement initial en fonction des capacités, du personnel et des processus de Gestion de placements CC&L. Depuis, l’approche de Gestion de placements CC&L à l’égard de la science des données de pointe, du développement de l’expertise et des modèles de placement exclusifs a pris de l’expansion et évolué au même rythme que les besoins d’Investissements RPC.

La relation entre Investissements RPC et Gestion de placements CC&L va au-delà d’un mandat de gestion de placements : il s’agit d’un partenariat stratégique, d’un parcours commun axé sur l’innovation, la résolution de problèmes et la croissance mutuelle. En 2024, nous avons célébré 20 ans de partenariat, un témoignage remarquable de la force et de la résilience de notre collaboration.

« L’ampleur de notre partenariat nous permet de résister à des périodes à la fois fortes et faibles et d’apporter les changements nécessaires. » affirme Martin Gerber, président et chef des placements de Gestion de placements Connor, Clark & Lunn. « Ce que nous faisons pour Investissements RPC aujourd’hui est très différent de ce que nous faisions il y a 20 ans, et ce, grâce au partenariat et à la confiance. »

Pour lire l’étude de cas complète, consultez le site Web de l’Institut sur les données d’Investissements RPC.

Global money trends suggest that major economic weakness will be deferred until later in 2026.

Six-month real narrow money momentum in the G7 and seven large emerging economies recovered further in October, almost returning to its March high – see chart 1.

Chart 1

271125c1

The fall from March into the summer is expected here to be reflected in a slowdown in industrial momentum – as proxied by global manufacturing PMI new orders – into late Q1 2026. The recent money growth recovery suggests a partial PMI rebound in Q2 – chart 2.

Chart 2

271125c2

The cyclical framework used here implies rising recession risk, with the stockbuilding and housing cycles in time windows to begin downswings. Monetary weakness would signal that a negative scenario is crystallising. The latest numbers appear to signal a delay.

The composition of the money growth rebound gives pause. The return towards the March high has been driven by further strength in the E7 component, with G7 real money momentum lagging significantly – chart 3.

Chart 3

271125c3

Narrow money trends are respectable or strong across major EMs, with the exception of Brazil – chart 4.

Chart 4

271125c4

Soft G7 growth reflects a slowdown in the US and continued – though moderating – weakness in Japan and the UK. Eurozone momentum rose further last month, though remains unexceptional.

Chart 5

271125c5

GACM_COMM_2025-11-20_Images_WPBanner

Japan’s equity market is undergoing a structural reset. In October, Japan experienced its strongest month in net equity inflow in at least two decades. Net purchases by foreign investors reached 3.44 trillion yen, largely beating the previous record of 2.68 trillion yen in April 2013. A few factors contributed to the rally:

  1. Expectations of pro-growth stimulus under new leadership of Sanae Takaichi.
  2. Optimism on AI-related stocks.
  3. Normalization of policy interest rate to create a sustainable and wage-driven inflation.
  4. Acceleration of Tokyo Stock Exchange’s (TSE) corporate governance reforms.

According to Bloomberg, net equity outflows during 2015–2022 were about 13 trillion yen. So, it is reasonable to think that there is plenty of room for more inflows in the future.

Political impact and AI sentiment can be volatile. At Global Alpha, we would rather focus on structural changes such as sweeping TSE reforms and normalization of policy interest rate for healthy inflation. These two factors have been the game changers of Japan equity market in the past three years.

Game changer #1: TSE reforms

The positive impact of the TSE reforms on the market is mainly reflected in higher dividends, share buybacks, return on equity (ROE) and price-to-book value (P/B). Since TSE’s initiative on increasing shareholder values in 2023, we have seen notable increases in dividend and share buybacks.Topix-Aggregate divident buybacks trend since FY3-04 copy

 Sources: Factset, Jefferies

In the global context, Japan still has a long way to go to improve its ROE and P/B. Currently, 47% of stocks in Japan Prime Index are trading below 1x P/B. In contrast, the percentage is 15% in MSCI Europe and 5% in S&P 500. Median ROEs during 2000–2024 for MSCI regions are 10.1% in Japan, 12.0% in Europe and 16.2% in the United States. Working toward global standards could be attractive opportunities for Japan equities.

Game changer #2: Normalization of policy interest rate

In March 2024, Japan exited its negative interest rate policy with the first hike in 17 years. Since January 2025, the rate has been stable at 0.5%. Bank of Japan (BOJ) expects core inflation to be around 2.7% for fiscal year 2025, slowing to 1.8% in fiscal year 2026 and returning to its 2% target in fiscal year 2027. Recent BOJ meeting summaries indicated a chance of further interest rate hikes.

Year to date, “banks” is among the top performing industry groups in the MSCI Japan Small Cap Index, up 46.8%. We have two holdings directly benefiting from both the rising interest rate cycle and improving corporate value.

  • Yokohama Financial Group Inc. (7186 JP)
    • One of Japan’s largest regional banks, growing both organically and via M&As.
    • A key differentiator is that its main customer base is in Kanagawa prefecture, close to Tokyo, which has a stable population outlook and strong economic growth.
    • ROE has been consistently improving from 2.3% in fiscal year 2021 to 7.0% now.
    • P/B also increased from 0.45 in fiscal year 2021 to 1.0 now.
    • After the recent quarter results, the company upgraded its full-year guidance for earnings and dividends.
    • Further, it unveiled a share buyback program for up to 30 billion yen.
  • Rakuten Bank Ltd. (5838 JP)
    • Japan’s first and largest digital bank by both customer accounts and deposit balances.
    • Its parent company Rakuten Group is the number one web brand in Japan with over 100 million members, which continues to benefit Rakuten Bank in customer acquisition and cross-selling.
    • The company is targeting roughly 25 million customer accounts and 20 trillion yen in deposits by fiscal year 2027.
    • Among the six digital banks in Japan, Rakuten Bank achieved the highest deposit growth in the past five years.
    • ROE has consistently been improving from 12.3% in fiscal year 2021 to 20.2%.

Image aérienne d’icebergs vue de dessus - Changement climatique et réchauffement climatique. Icebergs provenant de la fonte des glaciers. Paysage naturel glacé de l’Arctique, site classé au patrimoine mondial de l’Unesco.

L’arrivée du charbon a déclenché la première grande transition énergétique et a alimenté l’industrie, les villes et le progrès pendant des centaines d’années. Ce n’est que dans les années 1970 que les produits pétroliers ont pris le devant de la scène et que les combustibles fossiles sont devenus le pilier de la vie moderne. Le gaz naturel a gagné en importance au cours des dernières décennies. Le monde est à l’aube d’une autre transformation énergétique, mais cette fois, il y a bien davantage en jeu. Les transitions énergétiques précédentes ont été alimentées par la croissance économique et une consommation en plein essor. Maintenant, le défi consiste à garantir l’accès à l’énergie pour tous, tout en réduisant d’urgence les émissions pour protéger notre planète.

L’enjeu

L’atmosphère terrestre est comme une serre, les gaz comme la vapeur d’eau, le dioxyde de carbone et l’oxyde nitreux agissant comme des parois invisibles. Ils laissent entrer la lumière du soleil et emprisonnent la chaleur, maintenant notre planète suffisamment chaude pour la vie. Sans eux, la Terre serait un désert gelé. À mesure que nous rejetons davantage de gaz à effet de serre dans l’atmosphère, la planète se réchauffe.

Le dioxyde de carbone est le principal contributeur du réchauffement, dépassant de loin les autres gaz. Cinq grands secteurs sont en cause : l’énergie, l’agriculture, l’industrie, la gestion des déchets et les changements d’affectation des terres. À lui seul, le secteur de l’énergie est responsable de 76 % des émissions, principalement issues de la production d’électricité et de chauffage, des transports et de l’industrie manufacturière.

Depuis le début de la révolution industrielle, le dioxyde de carbone atmosphérique a bondi de plus du tiers sous l’effet de l’activité humaine. Le réchauffement de la planète a atteint de nouveaux sommets en 2024, qui est devenue l’année la plus chaude jamais enregistrée, dépassant pour la première fois 1,5 °C au-dessus des niveaux préindustriels.

Les conséquences

Le réchauffement de la planète affecte une multitude de systèmes, dont les océans, le climat, les sources de nourriture et la santé.

  • Fonte des calottes glaciaires : La glace du Groenland et de l’Antarctique est en train de fondre, libérant l’eau autrefois contenue dans les glaciers, ce qui engendre une élévation du niveau de la mer qui menace les communautés côtières.
  • Conditions météorologiques extrêmes : Les températures plus chaudes modifient les conditions météorologiques, entraînant une intensification des tempêtes, des inondations, des feux de forêt et des sécheresses.
  • Systèmes alimentaires : Les cultures peinent à pousser dans des sols déshydratés, l’eau se raréfie et les écosystèmes végétaux et animaux doivent migrer pour survivre.
  • Santé urbaine : La chaleur persistante dans les villes épaissit l’air de smog, causant de graves problèmes de santé.

La chaleur persistante dans les villes épaissit l’air de smog, causant de graves problèmes de santé.

  • Les risques liés à la transition comprennent l’incidence de l’adoption par les gouvernements de taxes sur le carbone ou de limites d’émissions strictes. Les sociétés pourraient voir leurs bénéfices diminuer du jour au lendemain. Les progrès technologiques pourraient rendre les systèmes énergétiques d’aujourd’hui obsolètes, ce qui forcerait les sociétés à innover sous peine de perdre du terrain. Tandis que les investisseurs et les consommateurs se tournent vers une plus grande durabilité, la réputation d’une société – et le cours de son action – pourrait fluctuer fortement si elle est perçue comme étant à la traîne en matière de lutte contre les changements climatiques.
  • Les risques liés à l’adaptation impliquent que même des solutions bien intentionnées pourraient avoir leurs effets pervers. La construction de digues peut prémunir les villes contre la montée des eaux, mais aussi perturber de fragiles écosystèmes. Toute action peut avoir des conséquences imprévues.

Plan de lutte contre les changements climatiques

Les gouvernements du monde entier retroussent leurs manches. L’Accord de Paris a établi des objectifs ambitieux pour la réduction des gaz à effet de serre, que les pays cherchent maintenant à remplacer par des cibles encore plus strictes, la plupart visant la « zéro émission nette » d’ici 2050. Chaque nation doit présenter son plan pour la prochaine décennie, expliquant comment elle réduira ses émissions et s’adaptera aux impacts des changements climatiques, et de quelle aide elle a besoin pour ce faire.

La tarification du carbone prend de l’ampleur, une quarantaine de pays imposant maintenant une taxe sur la pollution carbone afin d’encourager les énergies plus propres et de financer des projets durables. L’objectif est d’empêcher les températures mondiales d’augmenter de plus de 2 °C par rapport aux niveaux préindustriels et, idéalement, de limiter cette hausse à seulement 1,5 °C.

Bien que 2024 ait été la première année où les températures mondiales ont dépassé 1,5 °C, la science climatique examine les moyennes à long terme, et non seulement les pics sur une seule année. En maintenant une température inférieure à 1,5 °C, nous pourrions éviter des points de bascule irréversibles, réduire les phénomènes météorologiques extrêmes et protéger l’approvisionnement alimentaire.

Le facteur humain

Le plan d’action climatique pose un autre défi : les êtres humains sont peu doués pour la planification à long terme. Nous avons tendance à nous concentrer sur ce qui se trouve juste devant nous, ce qui rend difficile le respect des objectifs climatiques à long terme, comme en témoignent le retrait des États-Unis de l’Accord de Paris à deux reprises, et l’abandon discret par le Régime de pensions du Canada de son objectif d’atteindre la carboneutralité d’ici 2050, dans la foulée du resserrement des règles entourant les déclarations environnementales.

Les gens ont tendance à accorder plus d’importance aux risques et aux avantages à court terme qu’à ceux qui se situent dans un avenir lointain. Le dernier Rapport sur les risques mondiaux du Forum économique mondial illustre ce biais. À l’horizon des dix prochaines années, les risques climatiques sont majoritaires au sein des cinq principaux risques identifiés. Toutefois, à l’horizon des deux prochaines années, un seul risque climatique se classe parmi ces risques prioritaires. Si nous continuons de penser à court terme, nous risquons de passer à côté de ce qui est vraiment important et de faire obstacle aux progrès réels dans la lutte contre les changements climatiques.

Le rôle des investisseurs

Les investisseurs institutionnels ont un rôle central à jouer dans l’issue de la saga des changements climatiques. En dirigeant les capitaux vers des projets d’énergie renouvelable et respectueux du climat, ces investisseurs ont le pouvoir d’accélérer la transition mondiale vers un avenir sobre en carbone. Par l’engagement actionnarial et le vote par procuration, ils peuvent inciter les sociétés à réduire leurs émissions et à être plus transparentes à l’égard des risques climatiques.

Les organismes de réglementation canadiens tirent la sonnette d’alarme, soulignant que les changements climatiques ne représentent pas seulement un risque environnemental, mais aussi un risque financier. Les plus récentes lignes directrices de l’Association canadienne des organismes de contrôle des régimes de retraite (ACOR) exhortent les conseils d’administration à prendre les risques climatiques au sérieux, avertissant que les risques physiques et ceux liés à la transition ne feront qu’augmenter au fil du temps. Une gestion efficace des risques implique de se tourner vers l’avenir et de se préparer à ce qui nous attend.

Des occasions à saisir

La transition énergétique n’est pas seulement une question de responsabilité, c’est aussi une opportunité. Les investissements dans les énergies renouvelables, les transports électriques, les réseaux électriques et le stockage d’énergie ont déjà attiré près 2 000 milliards de dollars américains, affichant une croissance de plus de 10 %, même en période difficile. La figure 1 montre où va l’argent, les réseaux électriques et de transport électrifié se taillant la part du lion.

Figure 1 – Où vont les investissements

La figure 1 montre où vont les investissements La figure 1 met en évidence où va l’argent, les transports électrifiés et les réseaux électriques se taillant la part du lion.

Le passage aux énergies renouvelables n’est pas une voie toute tracée. Par exemple, même si le stockage par batterie s’améliore, de nombreux systèmes n’assurent que quelques heures d’autonomie, de sorte que des innovations sont nécessaires pour améliorer ce système. Bien que la technologie contribue à la lutte contre les changements climatiques, elle crée également des problèmes environnementaux et de productivité. Les infrastructures numériques et l’intelligence artificielle (IA) font augmenter la demande d’électricité. Les centres de données qui alimentent les modèles d’IA sont très énergivores, ce qui accroît la pression sur le réseau.

Les nouveaux secteurs émergents, tels que la géothermie et les carburants renouvelables, sont à la traîne par rapport aux secteurs plus matures, ne représentant que 7 % de l’investissement total et affichant une baisse importante par rapport aux années précédentes.

L’ampleur des investissements nécessaires dans les infrastructures est stupéfiante. Les routes, les aéroports, les centrales électriques, les services publics d’eau et les réseaux de télécommunications ont tous besoin d’importantes mises à niveau. Sans une augmentation des investissements, le monde pourrait faire face à un déficit d’infrastructures de 15 000 milliards de dollars américains d’ici 2040. Pour cette raison, les combustibles fossiles continueront de faire partie du portefeuille énergétique pendant de nombreuses années, malgré la baisse de leur consommation et la croissance rapide des énergies renouvelables. Le nucléaire fait aussi un retour en tant qu’option plus propre pour la production d’électricité à grande échelle, même s’il est coûteux et lent à mettre en place, ce qui limite son potentiel de contribution.

Passer à l’action

Les changements climatiques sont un risque que nous ne pouvons pas ignorer, mais ils constituent également une opportunité pour ceux qui sont prêts à agir. Les risques et les opportunités sont souvent perçus comme étant opposés. S’agissant des changements climatiques, toutefois, ils ne sont pas nécessairement en conflit, car une opportunité, comme investir dans les sources d’énergie renouvelable, peut jouer un rôle clé dans la gestion des risques liés au climat.

La transition énergétique exige des investissements, de l’innovation et du leadership. Les investisseurs ont un rôle crucial à jouer, et ceux qui se démarquent peuvent non seulement obtenir de solides rendements, mais aussi avoir une incidence durable sur la planète.

A measure of UK annual core CPI inflation excluding direct policy effects fell further to 2.8% in October, the lowest since August 2021 – see chart 1.

Chart 1

191125c1

The measure adjusts for the imposition of VAT on school fees and bumper one-off rises in water bills and vehicle excise duty. It does not strip out the indirect impact of government actions, including national insurance and minimum wage rises and new packaging waste fees. The NI increase alone may have boosted annual core inflation by 0.25 pp, based on projections in the February Monetary Policy Report.

Policy effects are fading from shorter-term rates of change. The adjusted core measure rose at a 2.5% annualised pace in the three months to October from the previous three months, and by 1.9% between July and October – chart 2.

Chart 2

191125c2

The core slowdown is consistent with lagged monetary trends, which suggest further deceleration in H1 2026.

Lows in annual broad money growth preceded lows in adjusted core inflation with mean and median lags of 26 and 29 months respectively since WW2. Money growth bottomed in October 2023, suggesting an inflation low between December 2025 and March 2026 – chart 3.

Chart 3

191125c3

The indirect policy effects cited above may have delayed transmission, raising the possibility of a longer-than-average lag on this occasion.

Money growth, moreover, has remained weak since 2023, suggesting that low core inflation will be sustained into 2027, at least.

Beyond core, food inflation has remained sticky but could break lower in 2026. Annual food inflation of 4.8% in October compares with 1.9% in the Eurozone. Readings were similar at the time of the October 2024 Budget, suggesting that most of the current wedge reflects policy effects. Average UK food inflation was below the Eurozone level over 2015-24.

Based on plausible core / food assumptions, and assuming a neutral Budget impact, annual headline CPI inflation could fall to c.2.25% by Q2 2026 (versus a Bank forecast of 2.9%), with a return to target during H2.

Chinese October money / credit numbers were mixed, suggesting a continuation of sluggish economic growth.

On the positive side, six-month growth of narrow money M1 extended its recent recovery, reaching its highest since March – see chart 1. (A fall in the year-on-year measure reflected an unfavourable base effect.)

Chart 1

141125c1

Broad credit slowed further, however, while growth of broad money – on the preferred definition here excluding deposits of financial institutions – fell back.

Concern about downside economic risks is supported by October activity numbers, showing faster rates of contraction of fixed asset investment and housing sales / starts – chart 2.

Chart 2

141125c2

The weakness of the fixed asset investment data is difficult to square with Q3 GDP results showing an investment contribution of 0.9 pp to annual growth of 4.8%. The national accounts number includes stockbuilding but there is no indication from other evidence – admittedly limited – of a rapid build-up of inventories.

Industrial output growth continues to hold up while retail sales recovered after September weakness.

The authorities announced modest additional stimulus measures in September / October – new investment financing and an increase in local government bond issuance, each of RMB500 bn – and probably need to see greater weakness in the data before considering further action.

A positive gap between money growth and nominal GDP expansion may continue to offer support to equities, given low bond yields and still-negative property trends.

From a global perspective, lacklustre Chinese news presents no challenge to the forecast here of a loss of industrial momentum into early 2026 – see previous post.

 

GACM_COMM_2025-11-13_Images_Banner

After decades of offshoring, companies are increasingly building capacity closer to end markets. This nearshoring trend has triggered a surge in new factories, warehouses and intermodal terminals. The world is entering a new phase of industrial investment as countries rebuild supply chains, renew critical infrastructure and accelerate the shift to cleaner logistics. Manufacturing nearshoring, port electrification and large-scale public infrastructure programs are reshaping industrial demand.  

Governments are deploying significant stimulus toward infrastructure modernization. The U.S. Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Europe’s Green Deal programs and national port renewal projects all call for automation and emissions reduction in logistics. Port operators, for example, are increasingly replacing diesel-powered cranes with hybrid or fully electric units, a market where Konecranes is already a technology leader. 

Among the beneficiaries from that multi-year capex cycle stands Konecranes (KCR FH), the Finnish leader in lifting equipment and services, positioned at the crossroads of automation and reindustrialization. Konecranes is one of our holdings in our International Small Cap Strategy.

As one of the largest global players in its niche, Konecranes benefits from scale-driven pricing power, a broad installed base and a growing stream of recurring service revenue. Its service segment, representing about 40% of group sales, generates EBITA margins above 20% – roughly double those of new equipment – thanks to long-term maintenance contracts and critical spare-parts sales that are largely price inelastic. The company services more than 600,000 cranes worldwide, leveraging its digital platform for predictive maintenance and uptime analytics. This connectivity creates high customer switching costs and allows for value-based pricing rather than cost-based competition.

Scale also enhances resilience. Through years of acquisitions and regional integrations, Konecranes has consolidated a fragmented market, broadening its service reach across 120 countries and multiple industries. This global footprint enables it to spread R&D, logistics and data infrastructure over a larger customer base while improving service response times – a key differentiator versus smaller peers. Moreover, the company’s ability to bundle equipment, parts and digital services strengthens customer relationships and supports long-term contracts that are difficult for competitors to displace. 

Equipment downtime can be very costly for customers. For Konecranes, this translates into pricing leverage and high renewal rates on service agreements. The inelastic nature of maintenance pricing, combined with the company’s deep integration into clients’ safety and compliance frameworks, provides durable margins and steady cash flow. Over time, Konecranes’ mix shift toward services and automation has driven operating margins from 7% to over 13% in five years, positioning it among the more profitable industrial equipment consolidators globally. 

Konecranes combines a diversified portfolio with a clear strategy centred on electrification, automation and data-driven service. This balance provides resilience across economic cycles while capturing long-term secular growth from reindustrialization and infrastructure renewal. We believe Konecranes is well placed to capture these structural tailwinds. Its technological leadership, digital service model and exposure to automation-driven capital expenditure make it a key indirect beneficiary of the ongoing industrial transformation.

Wadala, Sewri, Lalbaug - skyline of Mumbai, India.

Considering the importance of structural liquidity in emerging market investing

We argue that a narrow focus on company fundamentals leaves investors increasingly exposed to powerful external forces like structural and cyclical liquidity shifts.

These forces influence capital availability, investor behaviour and asset pricing, often overriding fundamentals in the short to medium term.

Below, we run through two EM-specific examples of how we think about structural liquidity, along with a brief comment on market structure globally.

China’s National Team steps in as foreign investors hit eject

The “China is un-investable” doldrums from early 2021 to the beginning of 2024 saw the MSCI China Index drop from a peak to trough by over 50% in USD terms. Haphazard regulatory clampdowns on the technology and education sectors, a collapsing property market, and Sino-US tensions saw foreign investors run for the exits.

At the peak of the revulsion, we saw many liquid and high-quality companies being dumped, seemingly irrespective of fundamentals. For us, this was a painful experience with many of our favourite names caught up in the stampede. It was also a valuable lesson about the impact of what we call structural liquidity in markets and its power to create extended and sharp periods of disequilibrium where prices appear completely detached from fundamentals.

In our process, we define structural liquidity as the long-term, underlying availability of capital within a financial system or market. Unlike short-term liquidity (which can fluctuate daily), structural liquidity is shaped by:

  • The depth and breadth of financial institutions
  • The regulatory environment
  • The savings rate and capital formation
  • The presence of long-term investors (e.g., pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and other state-linked allocators)
  • Factors outside of a given country – i.e. pressures on foreign allocators to shift exposure

Our clients are very familiar with our work analysing monetary cycles, with the aim of anticipating economic and market environments over the next year or so. This is a powerful tool for understanding the prevailing investment backdrop and how we expect it to evolve.

Structural liquidity gets less coverage, but understanding this factor can be just as impactful for performance, especially at extremes. Analysing the evolving composition of a country’s financial markets can provide insights into how changes in liquidity flows may be felt across asset classes.

Through the China doldrums, structural liquidity was working against us. Foreign investors were more heavily weighted to higher-quality companies, aligned with our stock picking bias. As these investors yanked funds from the market, we saw favoured names get cut down regardless of the fact that many of these business were fundamentally well positioned to weather China’s weak economy and geopolitical turbulence.

At the same time, state allocators in China (the “National Team”) were instructed to support the market. The reflex for these institutions was to buy ETFs loaded up with state owned enterprises (SOEs). This created an odd dynamic where more economically sensitive, highly indebted and relatively poorly governed companies (including distressed banks and property companies) were dramatically outperforming quality companies in an economic slump.

Investor flows and their composition had a huge impact on returns through much of the 2022–2024 period. In hindsight, the optimal strategy to navigate the volatility would have been to reduce the risk budget for “foreign favourites” while increasing the weighting to select SOEs which fit our stock picking framework. Unfortunately, we were slow to pick up the trend and by the time we had a firm grasp of the situation, valuations of our favourite businesses were starting to look incredibly cheap while already robust fundamentals appeared to be strengthening.

We reviewed China exposure in depth and exited a few positions that were exposed to persistently weak consumer sentiment. We also travelled in China extensively to meet with dozens of companies as soon as the country reopened from the pandemic. This helped to accelerate idea generation and generate more competition for capital within our China exposure. The rest was behavioural, with our iterative process of testing and re-testing stock theses and country views underpinning our conviction to stick with a number of out-of-favour companies.

The slump in quality stocks came to an end as Chinese authorities announced monetary and fiscal loosening in September 2024 to stimulate the economy. This was followed by the Deepseek shock in January 2025, which shone a light on Chinese innovation in AI which was progressing rapidly and at a fraction of the cost in the United States. Suddenly, domestic allocators were rushing into Chinese consumer tech stocks leading China’s AI development. Improving liquidity supported a broadening out of the rally, boosting other innovative companies such as battery leader CATL, drug development company Wuxi Biologics and Hong Kong financials such as Futu Holdings.

Structural liquidity is playing an important role in providing fuel for the rally. With China’s weak housing markets and longer-term bond yields recently moving up from record lows, equities have been the default beneficiary of improving monetary trends which has fuelled a liquidity-driven bull market this year.

China nominal GDP* (% 2q) & money / social financing* (% 6m)
*Own seasonal adjustment
Line graph showing China nominal GDP and money and/or social financing.
Source: NS Partners and LSEG.

So far it has been domestic money within China participating in the rally, with foreign investors yet to return. Global investors will likely want to see Sino-US tensions cool further following the October APEC summit between Trump and Xi where a temporary truce was announced.

China equities flows: domestic vs. foreign investors
Line graph showing China equity flows, comparing domestic and foreign investors.

Source: EPFR

While it is pleasing to see our investment style come back into favour, we aren’t falling in love with this rally. Any downturn in liquidity would be a signal to reduce exposure. In addition, while our companies have broadly reported well, much of the wider rally this year has come from re-rating.

Two bar graphs. The first bar graph illustrates the P vs. E contributions (according to MSCI markets) as a percentage of US-dollar total returns for different countries. The second bar graph illustrates the PE/G comparisions (according to MSCI APxJ markets as a PE/G ratio for different countries.
Source: Jeffries, October 2025

We are wary of chasing momentum in the China AI thematic without support from fundamentals. This is a fragile trade and vulnerable to a stall in money growth in our view.

Beware relying on mean reversion tables in India

India offers a different perspective on the importance of structural liquidity. Indian equities outperformed for years leading into 2025, and yet most EM investors were underweight the market citing rich valuations.

GEMs active vs. passive country allocations
Line graph comparing global emerging markets with active and passive country allocations to India.
Source: EPFR

While we were certainly mindful of India’s valuation premium to wider EM, the rise of domestic mutual funds driving flows into equities as Indian workers contribute to their pension accounts is a major structural change. We have seen this before in places like Chile or Australia, and once this trend picks up steam it can be dangerous to rely too heavily on your mean reversion tables!

While we did shift to an underweight in India at the end of 2024, the move was modest and largely based on a view that a deluge of IPOs coming to market was soaking up too much liquidity. This factor, combined with high valuations, supported our view that the market looked to be due a period of consolidation after several years of strong gains.

Model GEM portfolio: India strategy macro ratings and weightings

India Rating Exposure Share of risk Relative weight
October 2025 3 13% 16.9% -2.5%
June 2025 3 17% 22% -1.1%
December 2024 4 19% 20% -0.5%
June 2024 3 21% 30% +1.9%
December 2023 2 19% 19.7% +2.6%
June 2023 1 17% 14.4% +2.2%

Source: NS Partners

More recently however, agressive central bank rate cuts have fuelled a pick-up in cyclical liquidity, and while it is a near-term headwind, the flurry of IPOs will deepen the market and produce a more vibrant opportunity set. At the company level, earnings growth is set to lead EM for the next few years. While we are happy to wait for the market to come back to us for now, we see no reason to dismantle our India exposure with such a strong structural backdrop and will be ready to add back when the opportunity arises.

Passive dominance and market fragility

Thinking more broadly, we have been reading some eye-opening analysis from market strategist and investor Michael Green on the impact of rising passive dominance in markets. I won’t rehash the whole thesis in detail, but in a nutshell, Green argues that passive investing has fundamentally reshaped market dynamics by inflating valuations of the largest stocks and undermining traditional price discovery.

As index funds allocate capital based on market cap rather than fundamentals, they create a self-reinforcing cycle where rising prices attract more flows, further distorting valuations. This mechanism favours size and trend over intrinsic value and ignores quality companies outside major indices.

Markets become increasingly inelastic as passive share grows and the share of active and valuation-driven investment falls. The outcome is that liquidity no longer scales with market cap. This makes large stocks more vulnerable to outsized price impacts from passive flows.

Therefore, the largest beneficiaries of a constant inflows to passive vehicles could suffer sharp reversals should those flows reverse, exposing the market to volatility and mispricing.

Finally, Green highlights what he sees as an absurdity, being the construction of rigid rule-based investment strategies meant to operate in markets, which are complex adaptive systems. The dominance of this approach to investment is distorting markets and capital allocation which will have negative real-world impacts in magnifying the power of megacap firms and stifling innovation and creative destruction.

Having always considered the impact of structural liquidity in our markets as a part of our process, Green’s work resonates with our team. In our view, it will be crucial going forward for active investors to have an awareness of how rising passive dominance will create distortions in markets and identify the risks and opportunities that will flow from them.

The forecast that global manufacturing PMI new orders will inflect weaker from a Q4 peak is supported by the “internals” of the October survey.

While new orders rose on the month, the increase was smaller than had been suggested by DM flash surveys, reflecting an EM decline led by China and Korea – often global bellwethers.

Firms were gloomier despite the orders uptick, with the future output index falling to its lowest since April in the wake of the “Liberation Day” shock. In contrast to new orders, this component is below its post-2015 average – see chart 1. (So is the corresponding services gauge.)

Chart 1

051125c1

Pessimism may partly reflect an inventory overhang: indices measuring additions to stocks of purchased inputs and finished goods were in the 82nd and 97th percentiles of their long-run ranges (i.e. since 1998) respectively last month – more evidence that the global stockbuilding cycle is peaking.

Purchases of inputs boost orders of supplier firms. Accordingly, the new orders index is positively correlated with changes in the stocks of purchases index. The latter is likely to fall from its currently extended level. Even a stabilisation would imply a decline in the rate of change, in turn suggesting softer new orders – chart 2.

Chart 2

051125c2

Global manufacturing deceleration is often associated with underperformance of cyclical equity market sectors. The price relative of MSCI World non-tech cyclical sectors versus defensive sectors ex. energy is below a September peak – chart 3.

Chart 3

051125c3

Cyclical earnings are more at risk when pricing power is weak. The output price index has fallen back and is close to its 2010-19 average, while delivery delays remain below the corresponding average, suggesting excess capacity and / or inventories – chart 4.

Chart 4

051125c4i