CC&L Financial Group Ltd.

Global manufacturing PMI new orders recovered strongly in January following a November / December relapse. Both the fall and revival had been signalled by money trends: global six-month real narrow money momentum declined sharply in April / May 2025 but rebounded into November. The seven-month interval between a (revised) May low in real money momentum and the December PMI trough matches the lead time at the prior two turning points – see chart 1.

Chart 1

The rise in real narrow money momentum into November suggests that the PMI upswing will extend into Q2. As foreshadowed in a previous post, however, real money momentum declined sharply in December, retracing most of its May-November gain. Accordingly, the manufacturing bounce is expected to fizzle out in Q2, with renewed weakness into Q3.

Real narrow money momentum has slowed across most major economies, though to varying degrees. China and India have contributed most to the global decline, although the Indian number remains strong – chart 2.

Chart 2

The US series shown incorporates an adjustment for a suggested distortion to demand deposit data affecting the M1A measure used here. However, substituting the official M1 measure – unaffected by the mooted distortion – for M1A would give the same current reading.

Eurozone momentum remains above the US level while the UK has recovered from significant weakness in mid-2025, suggesting improving relative economic prospects. Still, both series have stalled at modest levels, cautioning against optimism.

Japanese real narrow money contraction continues to flag a policy mistake, while a faster decline in Brazil argues for urgent rate cuts. (The Brazil manufacturing PMI was the weakest in the global stable in January.)

Elsewhere, prior strength in Australian real narrow money momentum is consistent with recent upbeat economic news but a slowdown since September suggests that prospects were cooling before this week’s rate hike.

Eurozone and UK money trends have shown disappointingly small responses to policy easing, suggesting that rates remain in restrictive territory and casting doubt on hopes of stronger economic growth.

The preferred monetary aggregates here are “non-financial”, covering households and non-financial corporations. Money holdings of financial institutions are volatile and less informative about near-term economic prospects.

A recovery in six-month growth rates of Eurozone narrow and broad money stalled in early 2025 despite the ECB continuing to cut rates through June, with both well below pre-pandemic averages – see chart 1.

Chart 1

The UK profile is different. The laggardly pace of rate cuts appears to have contributed to a relapse in growth rates in H1 2025 but these recovered into November, moving sideways in December – chart 2.

Chart 2

While suggesting UK relative improvement, narrow money expansion remains beneath its pre-pandemic average (and the Eurozone level), with annual broad money growth a below-par 3.8% (versus 2.7% in the Eurozone).

One reason for the disappointing responses is that policy rate cuts have yet to translate into a decline in longer-term yields. Relatedly, UK QT has been a significant and unnecessary drag.

A hopeful scenario is that low inflation implied by weak broad money trends will allow longer-term yields to subside. Still, additional policy adjustment will likely also be required to generate a monetary response sufficient to warrant economic optimism.

Retail brokers have benefited immensely from the impact of retail investors on financial markets since the onset of COVID. Robinhood is now a familiar name to most Americans, but virtually all the brokerages globally have benefited from the rising tide of retail investors’ enthusiasm for investing and trading. In this note, we examine some of the mega-trends that have helped European brokerages outperform the market since COVID emerged in 2020.

1. Retail participation and retail financial product availability.

Since the 2008 recession, retail investors have gained access to a multitude of new products like index ETFs, crypto, fractional shares, robo-advisors, IPOs and even private markets. This led to an explosive growth in retail investment, especially since 2020 and the dawn of COVID. Digital and mobile platforms, along with significantly reduced commission costs, have made it easier than ever for a younger demographic to access the markets. The vast majority of onboarded customers over the last decade have not lived through the trauma of the 2008 recession and see any market pullback as an opportunity to double down on their favourite stocks.

2. Increase in cross-border trading.

It is well documented that investors, including retail, have historically had a strong home bias in their asset allocations. But the US stock market outperformance since 2009, along with the disproportionate share of tech mega-cap attention, has led to consistent inflows into the US market. It has also created a larger level of familiarity with US companies that are more covered/discussed by pundits. All this has led to a higher level of cross-border trading in non-US brokerages that is typically much more lucrative as they usually pocket a large spread on foreign exchange transactions.

3. Digitalization and banks losing market share.

Over the last decade, brokerages have been able to consistently gain market share from large banks, thanks to a less-bloated corporate structure and a tech stack that could be built from scratch and not built on legacy bank structures. This has allowed them to be in a position to compete more aggressively on fees, transaction costs and overall value proposition as retail brokerage fees remain a minuscule proportion of mega-banks’ revenue and don’t garner a lot of attention from a strategic perspective.

4. Increase in share of income from NII.

Although net interest income (NII) has been declining for European brokers since the end of 2023, decreasing with the ECB rates, it remains at a more attractive level than pre-COVID and is expected to remain as such for the foreseeable future. Additionally, most brokers have been able to increase NII since 2023 thanks to client gains and account cash balance more than compensating for the lower rates.

Brokers have also been more efficient at increasing the spread between the amount they pay on deposit and the amount they get paid (known as net interest margin or NIM). Having managed deposit pass-through well on the way up and down, brokers are now better structurally positioned to benefit from deposit growth.

5. Benefit from macro volatility.

A key feature of brokerages’ stocks in a portfolio is their positive skew to market volatility. Because they make money from the number of trades, they are agnostic to market direction, as long as it causes participants to trade more. Just over the last year or so, events such as the US election, Liberation Day, the French budget and now the Venezuela situation have all been positive tailwinds mentioned by various brokerage CEOs.

It’s worth noting, however, that brokerages are not immune to long periods or volatility or market drawdown, all of which would lead customers to reduce their equity exposure.

We gained exposure to the retail brokerage space in one of our strategies through Nordnet (SAVE SS), a Swedish brokerage firm with a banking licence. It has exposure primarily to the Nordics with a top-two position in all markets and is slowly working on building a presence in Germany. It derives a bit more than half its revenue from commission and the rest from interest income.

Sweden is one of the countries with the highest savings rate globally, and financial literacy is also higher than the Europe average. Finland, Norway and Denmark also rank highly but are less penetrated and less competitive than Sweden. All have been a strong source of growth for Nordnet, which has consistently been among the top names in the space for customer satisfaction.

Given its diversified product offerings that include a full suite of investments, savings, pension and banking products, as well as its best-in-class technology platform (releases an update every 2.5 days on average and with a 99.9% platform uptime), Nordnet is able to maintain a customer acquisition cost of SEK790 – which is below the vast majority of peers – and its small social media platform has been able to generate a strong media presence and customer engagement.

Here is where Nordnet stands on the brokers mega-trends:

Financialization: Sweden is one of the countries in Europe with high financial literacy. Other Nordic countries rank above average as well.
Cross-border trading: Between 2022 and 2025, share of cross-border trading increased from 27% to 31.5% and is one of the primary contributors to the increase in income per transaction increasing from SEK31 to SEK39 over that same period.
Digitalization and market share gains: Both Nordnet and its close competitor, Avanza, have gained tremendous market share over the last decade and now rank second and first respectively by trading activity. This is despite still being behind Sweden’s largest four banks on savings capital. They both rank top of their class on user experience surveys.
Net interest income: NII was as low as 20% of overall revenue in 2021 and is now steadying at 42% of total revenue after peaking at 58% in 2023. We expect the share of NII to remain structurally higher than pre-COVID.
Macro volatility: Nordnet benefited from large macro events such as the US election and Liberation Day. In Q2 2025, following Liberation Day, Nordnet reported a 22% year-over-year (YoY) increase in trading volume. As for the US election in 2024, it saw a 14% YoY increase in trading volume.

Despite the volatility of their operational performance, brokerage firms provide a unique type of exposure to a diversified portfolio, one that is very different to how you would think of typical insurance and bank financials. There are reasons to believe brokers will continue to outperform the overall market and will continue to look for opportunities to participate.

Crestpoint Real Estate Investments Ltd. (“Crestpoint”) announced today that it has acquired a portfolio consisting of 22 retail properties and two office assets.

The portfolio comprises ~1 million square feet across 22 well located retail properties, including 15 single-tenant sites and seven grocery/pharmacy anchored centres. With assets spanning Manitoba, Quebec, and – most significantly – Ontario, the portfolio provides broad geographic diversification and exposure to some of Canada’s most resilient retail markets. The portfolio is 100% leased and anchored by essential service retailers in grocery, pharmacy and home improvement, with nationally recognized tenants such as Shoppers Drug Mart, Sobeys, Walmart, Metro and RONA.

The portfolio includes two office assets, the first being a Class A building, 145 Wellington St. W., in Toronto’s financial core, located in close proximity to the subway. The building is tenanted by a diversified mix of federal government, non-profit, engineering and insurance occupiers, among others, providing exposure to both public-sector and high-quality private-sector tenants. Current rental rates remain below market levels, providing meaningful upside potential and supporting strong income growth over time. The second office asset is located in Markham, Ontario and is a fully occupied 75,000 square foot, single-tenant office building on a 3.5 acre site, conveniently located near Warden Avenue, Highway 407 and nearby commercial amenities.

Crestpoint is acquiring a 100% interest in this portfolio on behalf of the Crestpoint Opportunistic Real Estate Strategy (its closed-end fund).

This represents the fourth acquisition for the Crestpoint Opportunistic Real Estate Strategy, which closed on December 19, 2025, and already has over 70% of its committed equity deployed.

US narrow money is growing slowly, casting doubt on expectations of economic strength. Broad money growth is faster but still within a normal range (and has been less informative about near-term economic prospects historically).

December numbers support the contention in a previous post that the Fed series for demand deposits has been distorted by the inclusion in mid-November of accounts previously classified as savings deposits. Weekly figures show a large jump over two weeks*, with a corresponding drop in “other liquid deposits”, which includes savings deposits. Demand deposits have since returned to weak expansion – see chart 1.

Chart 1

The distortion has affected the M1A narrow money measure calculated here, comprising currency in circulation and demand deposits. Similar reclassifications appear to have occurred in several months over 2020-22, following removal of reserve requirements in March 2020, which effectively equalised the treatment of demand and savings deposits. The procedure adopted then was to assume that monthly growth of demand deposits would have matched that of total liquid deposits in the absence of the distortion.

Applying the same adjustment now suggests “true” six-month growth of M1A of 3.8% annualised in December, down from 5.3% in November. This is very similar to growth rates of the official M1 and M2 measures, as well as currency in circulation (3.9%, 4.3% and 3.9% respectively) – chart 2.

Chart 2

A broader “M2+” aggregate rose by 6.2% annualised over the same period, reflecting strong expansion of institutional money funds. (Official M2 includes retail but not institutional money funds.) Still, this growth rate is within an acceptable range of a suggested 5% pa “target” – the average over 2015-19, a period of moderate economic growth and inflation quiescence.

*The inclusion would have occurred on a single day but weekly numbers are averages, so the impact of a mid-week change would be spread over two weeks.

2026 portfolio strategy and positioning
Secular themes shaping the outlook
Cyclical outlook over the year
Conclusion

This year’s Forecast begins with a synopsis of 2025 before delving into the secular themes shaping our outlook, and then examines the shorter-term cyclical factors affecting the economy, inflation and monetary policy. We assess market valuations and, considering these elements, establish our portfolio strategy.

**Throughout the next year, updates to our forecasts will be highlighted in our quarterly newsletter Outlook.**

Introduction

2025 was a year of shocks followed by resilience. Despite extreme policy uncertainty, equity markets delivered a third consecutive year of strong gains as investors looked through geopolitics and focused on earnings durability and AI-driven investment. Canadian equities outperformed, benefiting from relative policy stability, resilient growth and a surge in gold prices amid geopolitical and institutional uncertainty.

Entering 2026, markets face fewer immediate stresses than in prior years, but outcomes remain highly sensitive to policy, inflation and confidence. In the coming pages, we present our portfolio strategy and positioning, and discuss the long-term and cyclical shorter-term influences on markets.

Chart 1: Strong equity market gains in 2025 led by Canada
Total returns in local currency rebased at 01/01/2025 = 100

Source: TMX, S&P Global, MSCI, Macrobond

Chart 2: Gold surged in 2025

Source: CME group, Macrobond

2026 portfolio strategy and positioning

Equity markets begin 2026 with a favourable backdrop. Supportive monetary and fiscal policy as well as solid nominal growth underpin a positive environment for equities. Company earnings remain resilient, supported by healthy nominal growth and easing cost pressures. AI-driven investment continues to shape capital allocation across technology, industrials, energy infrastructure and utilities, while related productivity expectations remain a meaningful contributor to valuations. At the same time, high valuations in the United States temper upside potential, but represent better value in Canada and other non-US markets.

Bond markets reflect a balance between the moderating labour markets and longer-term inflation and fiscal concerns. Long-end yields remain bounded in a “higher-for-longer” range by persistent fiscal expansion, reconfiguration of global power structures and sustained investment needs. Policy easing is expected to continue early in the year, amid ongoing concerns around the central banks’ credibility in the face of stubborn underlying inflation.

Chart 3: Earnings growth to remain solid
Trailing earnings growth

Source: I/B/E/S, Bloomberg, Macrobond

Asset allocation

The macroeconomic environment favours a balanced approach that recognizes both the progress made on disinflation and the persistence of structural forces keeping long-term rates elevated. While policy easing supports risk assets, we hold a neutral allocation across equities and a modest underweight in fixed income. We prefer Canadian and emerging market equities relative to global equities.

Fundamental equity positioning

Our fundamental equity portfolios have added high-quality cyclical companies that will benefit from broadening economic growth, such as financials and autos. We increased infrastructure exposure to benefit from AI-related capex as well as deglobalization and protectionist policies. We also added to mid-cap gold producers given spot prices will support strong free cash flow generation over the year. We have reduced lower-growth and interest rate-sensitive companies given expectations of interest rate volatility.

Chart 4: Limited scope for further expansion

Source: I/B/E/S, Bloomberg, Macrobond

Fixed income positioning

In fixed income portfolios, we are managing duration exposure tactically within the recent range in bond yields, as interest rates fluctuate alongside downside economic surprises and upside pressures on long-end yields. Long-term rates are expected to see upside pressure, a global trend. We maintain a yield curve steepening bias. Meanwhile, short-term rates in Canada, currently pricing in central bank rate hikes, should see limited upside from here.

The backdrop of easing inflation and stable demand supports credit fundamentals, and the strong profits, income and policy backdrop are likely to persist. However, the tightest spreads in over a decade, combined with asymmetric risk-reward dynamics, lead to a neutral overall exposure. Within credit, we prefer corporate bonds over provincials.

Secular themes shaping the outlook

Inflation: A higher, more volatile floor

Disinflation over the past two years reflects the unwinding of acute shocks, not a return to pre-2020 levels. Global trade networks are adapting to shorten supply chains, prioritize resilience and elevate geopolitical considerations over cost efficiency. Aging populations and reduced immigration imply a shrinking of working-age populations and tighter labour markets. Large-scale infrastructure renewal, defence modernization and expansion, coupled with energy transition investment, all reinforce upward pressure on costs. Persistent momentum in nominal GDP will anchor growth rates higher for wages, rents, earnings and government outlays. In this environment, maintaining confidence in central bank independence remains critical, as any erosion of the US Federal Reserve’s (the Fed) credibility would raise the long-term risk that inflation expectations become less firmly anchored. Inflation is likely to trend lower, but with a higher floor, greater volatility and an increased risk of resurgence if demand firms or policy eases prematurely.

AI and the productivity wildcard

AI is reshaping capital allocation, labour demand and corporate strategy, but its macro impact remains uneven. Near-term effects are capital intensive as adoption has accelerated, boosting investment in data centres, semiconductors and power infrastructure. To fund this buildout, companies are increasingly turning to credit issuance, both public and private. This reflects the scale of ambition but also introduces financial stability risks, should funding conditions tighten or expected returns fail to materialize. While early adopters remain confident in the displacement of routine cognitive roles, AI has not yet delivered on the promised broad productivity gains. Longer-term benefits depend on diffusion into enterprise processes, organizational redesign and workforce adaptation, which historically take time. A deeper question concerns the long-term social consequences, notably how the distributional and employment impacts will be managed. AI represents both a powerful growth opportunity and a source of uncertainty around labour displacement, inequality and financial stability.

Bigger government and fiscal dominance

Fiscal policy has shifted from cyclical support to a persistent structural force. Even as central banks have cut interest rates, politically entrenched deficits, industrial policies, defence spending and climate-related investments are creating a potent blend of policy support . This encourages growth and employment, reducing the likelihood of a downturn. However, it constrains monetary policy from deploying restrictive policy as debt service costs surge. This dynamic implies asymmetric responses to inflation, leaving the risk of inflation settling above target. Elevated bond issuance and debt-servicing sensitivity imply higher term premiums, wider yield ranges and greater volatility in long-term rates.

Geopolitics and a fragmented world

Globalization is giving way to regionalization and strategic alignment. Trade, capital flows and supply chains are increasingly shaped by security concerns rather than efficiency. Countries at the intersection of the realignments, such as Mexico, parts of Southeast Asia and Canada are positioned to benefit. However, this global reordering raises costs, complicates coordination and sustains higher risk premiums . As a result, global allocators are reassessing concentrated exposure to US dollar denominated assets. While the US dollar remains dominant, diversification across currencies, jurisdictions and real assets is gradually increasing.

Hyper-financialization and fragility

Financial markets now exert outsized influence on real economic outcomes. Consumption, hiring and investment are increasingly sensitive to asset prices, particularly equities. The concentration of wealth effects at the top of the income distribution has so far supported spending growth. However, this also introduces overall consumer vulnerability to a reversal in market confidence. This is particularly true in light of higher interest rates (punitive for borrowers and more rewarding for savers) as well as high inflation that is borne disproportionately by lower income earners . Financial market risks are compounded in private markets where leverage is higher, transparency is lower and liquidity is thinner. This can lead to valuation mismatches as refinancing pressures, particularly to fund the AI buildout, rise.

Cyclical outlook over the year

The United States: A mid-cycle expansion continues, with inflation risks

The United States enters 2026 in a mid-cycle expansion supported by fiscal stimulus, easing financial conditions and sustained AI-related capex. High-income consumers remain resilient, and credit availability is improving. However, labour markets are gradually softening, services inflation remains sticky and tariffs are beginning to pass through to prices. Inflation risks are asymmetric: renewed demand or overly accommodative policy could reaccelerate inflation and force a less dovish Fed than markets expect.

Europe: Gradual stabilization amid structural headwinds

Europe shows signs of gradual stabilization as fiscal flexibility increases and rate cuts ease financial conditions. Defence and infrastructure spending support activity, notably in Germany. However, political fragmentation with coalition governments and populism imply rising fiscal strains as there is no appetite for fiscal austerity. Trade pressures and energy transition costs will constrain growth across the region. Inflation is moderating, but wage dynamics from challenging demographics, combined with rising food and energy costs, all remain upside risks.

China: Managed moderation

China continues a path of controlled slowdown, with growth driven by manufacturing, exports and state-directed investment rather than consumption. The property-sector correction remains a key drag on household confidence. Inflation is persistently below target with pressure on the downside from weak pricing power and industrial capacity. Policy support is targeted, as authorities prioritize financial stability and do not want to reflate housing aggressively. External risks persist, especially with trade, but incremental easing and stabilization efforts should help reduce deflation risks into this year.

Canada: Renewed potential output growth

Canada weathered 2025 better than expected despite significant trade shocks and housing weakness. Household leverage, mortgage resets, slower population growth and subdued business sentiment remain constraints. Looking ahead, risks are easing. Fiscal spending on infrastructure, housing and defence provides a positive thrust, while contained inflation gives the Bank of Canada room to remain accommodative. Trade frictions may resume in light of the USMCA renegotiations, but Canada enters 2026 with improving labour dynamics and renewed potential output growth.

Conclusion

After three consecutive years of strong equity returns, the investment environment entering 2026 is shifting. Equity performance is increasingly expected to be driven by earnings growth rather than valuation expansion, against a macro backdrop that remains broadly supportive. Canada’s combination of commodity exposure, improving earnings momentum and relatively attractive valuations stands in contrast to the highly valued US market, while bond yields appear range bound as inflation and interest-rate pressures offset one another.

Beyond the near-term cycle, markets are being shaped by powerful secular forces. Geopolitical fragmentation, sustained large fiscal deficits and rapid AI-driven investment are reshaping growth, inflation and policy constraints. Inflation is easing, but is likely to remain more volatile than in the pre-pandemic era.

We’re pleased to reflect on another year of meaningful growth and strategic advancement across our portfolio.

Transformative acquisitions

Oakcreek

In May 2025, Oakcreek Golf & Turf completed the acquisition of Pattlen Enterprises including L.L. Johnson in Denver, Colorado and Midwest Turf in Omaha, Nebraska.

This acquisition reinforces Oakcreek’s position as one of the largest, full-service distributors of Toro commercial turf equipment in North America.

Purity Life

In September 2025, Purity Life completed the acquisition of Horizon Distributors, PSC Natural Foods and Ontario Natural Food Company.

This acquisition further solidifies Purity Life’s leadership in the Canadian natural health, grocery and wellness distribution market, creating one of the country’s largest, full-service platforms with an unwavering commitment to excellent customer and vendor service.

Learn more about our portfolio.

New to Banyan and recent promotions

We’re excited to share the following promotions and additions to our firm as the depth and breadth of our team continues to grow:

Marat Altinbaev promoted to Director	Alex Gelmych promoted to Senior Analyst	James Nash has joined as Analyst

Our success at Banyan is built on the talent, dedication, and leadership of our people.

Learn more about our team.

New investments

Our focus heading into 2026 remains the same. We are looking to make long-term equity investments alongside world-class management teams in businesses across North America with EBITDA of at least $5 million.

Do you have an opportunity in mind? Learn more about our investment criteria or connect with us today.

Chinese economic growth held up in H2 2025 but a fall in six-month real narrow money momentum in November-December suggests weakening prospects – see chart 1.

Chart 1

December money numbers are also available for Brazil, India and Japan, showing declines in momentum for the former two, with Japan remaining negative.

US and European data will be released next week. Assuming unchanged growth rates, the above information implies a significant fall in global (i.e. G7 plus E7) six-month real narrow money momentum, retracing much of the July-November recovery – chart 2.

Chart 2

Global real money momentum may be about to cross beneath six-month industrial output growth, which rose into November.

Chart 3 shows a long-term comparison of G7-only real narrow money and industrial output momentum, using 12- rather than six-month rates of change. The series converged in November, supporting the suggestion of a change in “excess” money conditions.

Chart 3

Signs of a narrow money slowdown, albeit tentative, are consistent with the negative cyclical view here, based on an expectation that the global stockbuilding cycle will enter a downswing this year into a possible H1 2027 low.

A measure of US broad money M3 derived from data in the Fed’s quarterly financial accounts grew at a 5.5% annualised rate in the two quarters to end-September. This exactly equals the average over the non-inflationary five years to end-2019 – see chart 1.

Chart 1

The growth rate is also close to a 5.4% six-month annualised increase in the monthly M2+ measure calculated here. M2+ adds large time deposits and institutional money funds to official M2. M3 additionally includes repos.

M2+ growth rose to 6.7% in November, with available information suggesting a further increase in December. This could signal a future rise in inflation, though probably not before H2 2027. However, a similar pick-up a year ago reversed in H1 2025.

An advantage of the financial accounts measure is that a sectoral breakdown is available. M3 holdings of the household and non-financial business sectors rose at similar rates in the two quarters to September (5.2% and 5.0% annualised respectively), with stronger growth (12.7%) in financial sector money (i.e. held by insurance companies, pension funds and GSEs) – chart 2.

Chart 2

While household broad money continues to grow respectably, it has lagged far behind financial wealth. Money accounted for 14.0% of total financial assets at end-September, the lowest share since Q2 2019 – chart 3.

Chart 3

The equity share of financial wealth, meanwhile, reached another post-WW2 record of 47.1%.

The fall in the broad money share since 2022 has been driven by time and savings deposits, with the combined weighting of currency, checkable deposits and money funds stable – chart 4.

Chart 4

A chart recently doing the rounds shows only the latter measure (i.e. excluding time and savings deposits) to support a claim that household cash levels are high. Such selective use of data is regrettable.

(Note that the share of time and savings deposits has also been reduced by the reclassification of some savings deposits as demand – i.e. checkable – deposits.)

The rise in the equity share mostly reflects price appreciation but households have also been buying into strength.

The rally from the October 2022 low was initially driven by corporate demand but this fell off after H1 2024, with household and foreign purchases taking up the slack – chart 5.

Chart 5

The broad money share reached a similar level before the GFC bear market and corrections in 2015 and 2018, as well as the 2020 covid sell-off.

The share fell below the current level in the late 1990s but equity exposure was then significantly lower, peaking at 38.7%. Put differently, the higher beta of the balance sheet now makes a similar cash undershoot less likely.

The past year was yet another eventful one for sustainability investors and the broader Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) landscape. 2025 was marked by a succession of extreme weather events, a near-record global temperature average and significant international policy developments, including the EU’s Omnibus simplification package and further amendments to greenwashing claims under Canada’s Competition Act. Importantly, the average global temperature for the three-year period from 2023 to 2025 likely exceeded the 1.5°C threshold above pre-industrial levels for the first time – a milestone that underscores the growing urgency for governments, companies and investors to reassess how climate risks are managed and priced.

In this commentary, we highlight five ESG trends set to shape the year ahead, revealing both challenges and opportunities for investors and businesses alike.

1. From climate mitigation to climate survival

With the 1.5°C threshold now effectively behind us, the focus is shifting from climate mitigation alone to climate adaptation and resilience. Markets are increasingly pricing physical climate risks – from flooding and heat stress to water scarcity – into valuations, insurance costs and credit risk. At the policy level, governments are directing more capital toward adaptation priorities such as resilient infrastructure, water systems, food security and disaster preparedness, with several countries announcing a major increase in adaptation finance, aiming to triple it to $120 billion annually by 2035. For investors, exposure to climate resilience is becoming critical. We believe that companies enabling societies to withstand and adapt to physical climate impacts are likely to play an increasingly important role in long-term portfolios.

2. ESG returns to its financial roots

After surging in prominence during the pandemic years, ESG has faced political pushbacks and skepticism in parts of the market. This recalibration is now forcing a clearer definition of what ESG truly represents: financially material business issues. Labour practices, supply-chain resilience, governance failures and environmental liabilities matter because they can directly affect cash flows, valuations and license to operate – and indirectly shape the long-term sustainability of economic growth. In 2026, we believe ESG will be re-anchored to its original purpose: identifying risks and opportunities that are financially relevant to investors.

3. ESG integration is also becoming mainstream

ESG is no longer a niche strategy or a product label. Sustainability considerations are increasingly embedded across investment processes, from equity and credit analysis to portfolio construction and risk management. In Canada alone, ESG integration is used by 96% of investors, representing 87% of AUM. Whether or not a fund is explicitly marketed as “ESG,” these factors are becoming part of standard due diligence, and therefore increasingly a core component of the investment infrastructure. We believe this trend will continue in the new year and accentuate in many markets around the world as countries like Japan, China and India are increasingly adopting ESG initiatives.

4. The redefinition of “responsible” capital

Energy security, defence, critical infrastructure and industrial resilience are being re-examined through an ESG lens. Investors are increasingly debating when exclusion gives way to responsibility, and whether financing defence capabilities, transition metals or strategic industries is incompatible with – or essential to – long-term sustainability. This shift reflects a more pragmatic approach to ESG, recognizing that social stability, security and resilient supply chains are foundational to sustainable development. We believe that 2026 will be marked by further discussions and guidance around how to invest responsibly in previously deemed harmful sectors, with workgroups such as the Principles for Responsible Defence Investment (PRDI) initiative.

5. AI and data-driven ESG analysis

Artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced data analytics are transforming how most sectors operate. ESG is no different. From climate modelling and supply-chain monitoring to controversy detection and impact measurement, AI is enabling more timely, granular and forward-looking ESG analysis. The competitive edge is moving away from simply having ESG data toward better understanding of the data, as well as interpreting signals faster and more effectively than the market. As AI capabilities continue to advance, we believe ESG will increasingly become more dynamic, data-driven and integral to enhance risk management, uncover emerging opportunities and improve long-term investment decision-making.

Final thoughts

At Global Alpha, it’s never been about chasing ESG trends, but remaining disciplined and consistent in our investment processes. ESG has always been about financial risk mitigation and long-term value creation – doing what is right for our clients by identifying material risks and opportunities in a rapidly changing world. From climate resilience and supply-chain stability to governance quality and data-driven analysis, ESG considerations have long been embedded in how we assess risk and opportunity across portfolios.

As the ESG landscape continues to evolve, our philosophy remains unchanged: identifying and managing material risks, while allocating capital to businesses positioned to create durable value in a rapidly changing world.