Image of office skyscrapers with reflections in the sunlight

Connor, Clark & Lunn Funds Inc. (CC&L Funds) is excited to announce two absolute-return oriented portfolios in liquid alternative fund form, CC&L Global Market Neutral II Fund and CC&L Global Long Short Fund (the Funds).

CC&L Global Market Neutral II Fund seeks to earn a positive and attractive risk-adjusted return over the long term while demonstrating low correlation with, and lower volatility than, traditional equity markets. Risk rating: Low to Medium.

CC&L Global Long Short Fund seeks to provide long-term capital appreciation and attractive risk-adjusted returns by actively investing in a portfolio of long and short securities. Risk rating: Medium.

To manage the Funds, CC&L Funds has retained Vancouver-based Connor, Clark & Lunn Investment Management Ltd. (CC&L Investment Management), one of Canada’s largest privately-owned asset management firms, with close to 20 years of experience in managing alternative investment strategies for institutional investors.

“We have been told by our client base that they want access to institutional-caliber alternative investments, managed by a team with a demonstrated track record of success, in the convenience of a liquid alternative fund. By introducing these two new portfolios, we are meeting those objectives and providing investment advisors and their clients with two attractive risk & return profiles to choose from,” said Tim Elliott, President and CEO of CC&L Funds.

“We are excited that these alternative investment solutions are being made available to a broader group of individual Canadian investors. As we have transitioned into an environment with structurally higher interest rates and inflation, we expect market cycles to be shorter, volatility to be higher, and returns from conventional risk assets to be lower. In such an environment, we believe it will become more important for investors to incorporate sources of return that are independent of stock and bond markets to enhance portfolio outcomes,” said Martin Gerber, President and Chief Investment Officer at CC&L Investment Management.

Both CC&L Funds and CC&L Investment Management are affiliates of Connor, Clark and Lunn Financial Group (CC&L), whose multi-affiliate structure brings together the talents of diverse investment teams that offer a broad range of traditional and alternative investment solutions. CC&L is one of Canada’s largest independently owned asset managers, responsible for over $104 billion in assets on behalf of institutional and individual investors.

About the funds

Available in A and F Series, the Funds conform with the regulatory framework related to alternative mutual funds offered by Simplified Prospectus. The Funds are offered through licensed investment dealers, priced daily, with daily liquidity, and available through FundServ.

About Connor, Clark & Lunn Funds Inc.

Connor, Clark & Lunn Funds Inc. (CC&L Funds) partners with leading Canadian financial institutions and their investment advisors to deliver unique institutional investment strategies to individual investors through a select offering of funds, alternative investments and separately managed accounts.

By limiting the offering to a focused group of investment solutions, CC&L Funds is able to deliver unique and differentiated strategies designed to enhance traditional investor portfolios. For more information, please visit cclfundsinc.com.

About Connor, Clark & Lunn Investment Management Ltd.

Connor, Clark & Lunn Investment Management Ltd. (CC&L Investment Management) is one of the largest independent partner-owned investment management firms in Canada with $54.2 billion in assets under management. Founded in 1982, CC&L Investment Management offers a diverse array of investment services including equity, fixed income, balanced and alternative solutions including portable alpha, market neutral and absolute return strategies.

CC&L Investment Management is a part of Connor, Clark & Lunn Financial Group Ltd. (CC&L Financial Group), a multi-boutique asset management company whose affiliates collectively manage approximately $104 billion in financial assets. For more information, please visit cclinvest.cclgroup.com.

About Connor, Clark & Lunn Financial Group Ltd.

Connor, Clark & Lunn Financial Group Ltd. (CC&L Financial Group) is an independently owned, multi-affiliate asset management firm that provides a broad range of traditional and alternative investment management solutions to institutional and individual investors. CC&L Financial Group brings significant scale and expertise to the delivery of non-investment management functions through the centralization of all operational and distribution functions, allowing talented investment managers to focus on what they do best. CC&L Financial Group’s affiliates manage over $104 billion in assets. For more information, please visit cclgroup.com.

Contact

Lisa Wilson
Manager, Product & Client Service
Connor, Clark & Lunn Funds Inc.
416-864-3120
[email protected]

Downtown skyline of Toronto Canada at twilight.

Connor, Clark & Lunn Funds Inc., the manager of PCJ Absolute Return II Fund (the “Fund”) is pleased to announce a change to the liquidity terms of the Fund.

Effective immediately, Fund purchase, sale and switch orders will move from weekly at 4 pm Eastern Time on Fridays, to daily at 3 pm Eastern Time on each Business Day or before the TSX closes for the day, whichever is earlier, and all orders will be processed based on the net asset value calculated that day. Orders received after 3 pm Eastern Time will be processed on the next Business Day based on that day’s net asset value.

About Connor, Clark & Lunn Funds Inc.

Connor, Clark & Lunn Funds Inc. (CC&L Funds) partners with leading Canadian financial institutions and their investment advisors to deliver unique institutional investment strategies to individual investors through a select offering of funds, alternative investments and separately managed accounts.

By limiting the offering to a focused group of investment solutions, CC&L Funds is able to deliver unique and differentiated strategies designed to enhance traditional investor portfolios. For more information, please visit cclfundsinc.com.

Forward-Looking Information

This news release may contain forward-looking information (within the meaning of applicable securities laws) relating to the business and operations of the Manager and the Fund (“forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as “believe”, “anticipate”, “project”, “expect”, “intend”, “plan”, “will”, “may”, “estimate” and other similar expressions. The forward-looking statements in this news release are based on certain assumptions; they are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to control or predict. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the factors discussed under the heading “What is a Mutual Fund and What Are the Risks of Investing in a Mutual Fund?” in the simplified prospectus available on the SEDAR profile of the Fund at www.sedar.com. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate as actual outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Readers, therefore, should not place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. Further, these forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this news release and, except as expressly required by applicable law, the Manager and the Fund assume no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Contact

Lisa Wilson
Manager, Product & Client Service
Connor, Clark & Lunn Funds Inc.
416-864-3120
[email protected]

Connor, Clark & Lunn Funds Inc. (CC&L Funds) is excited to announce the recent launch of a prospectus qualified version of the NS Partners International Equity Focus portfolio, which is now available to individual Canadian investors. The NS Partners International Equity Focus Fund is based on a similar portfolio, previously available only to institutional and internal investors.

The Fund seeks to provide investors with long term capital appreciation by investing in a portfolio comprised primarily of non-North American equities, including up to 20% in emerging markets.

To manage the fund, CC&L Funds has retained NS Partners Ltd (NS Partners) a London, UK-based manager with over 30 years of experience in managing international equity portfolios, including developed and emerging markets. NS Partners combines a bottom-up quality/growth framework to analyze companies with a unique top-down global liquidity analysis to help identify regions, countries and sectors that are expected to out and underperform, as well as whether to position the portfolio for a ‘risk-seeking’ or ‘risk averse’ environment.

“For investors allocated to large-cap global equity portfolios, there is a compelling case to make a stand-alone allocation to international equities, given the valuation and concentration issues in the large-cap U.S. equity market, and the headwind of a strong U.S. dollar. By introducing our NS Partners International Equity Focus portfolio in fund format, we can offer a compelling solution for individual investors, managed by a proven, institutional caliber investment team with a differentiated approach” said Tim Elliott, President and CEO of CC&L Funds.

“We’re excited that our International Equity Focus portfolio is being made accessible to a broader group of Canadian investors. With our proven process, a strong record on the institutional side and our talented and committed investment team, we believe this portfolio will provide an attractive solution for those seeking long-term growth from international equity markets.” said Tim Bray, President and Chief Investment Officer at NS Partners.

Both CC&L Funds and NS Partners are affiliates of Connor, Clark and Lunn Financial Group (“CC&L”), whose multi-affiliate structure brings together the talents of diverse investment teams who offer a broad range of traditional and alternative investment solutions. CC&L is one of Canada’s largest independently owned asset managers, responsible for over $104 billion in assets on behalf of institutional and individual investors.

About the fund

Available in A and F Series, the fund conforms with the regulatory framework related to conventional mutual funds offered by Simplified Prospects. The fund will be offered through licensed investment dealers, priced daily, with daily liquidity, and available through FundServ.

About Connor, Clark & Lunn Funds Inc.

Connor, Clark & Lunn Funds Inc. (CC&L Funds) partners with leading Canadian financial institutions and their investment advisors to deliver unique institutional investment strategies to individual investors through a select offering of funds, alternative investments and separately managed accounts.

By limiting the offering to a focused group of investment solutions, CC&L Funds is able to deliver unique and differentiated strategies designed to enhance traditional investor portfolios. For more information, please visit www.cclfundsinc.com.

About NS Partners Ltd

NS Partners Ltd is an independent investment management firm specializing in actively managed global equity portfolios on behalf of major companies, pension funds, foundations, endowments and sovereign wealth funds. NS Partners Ltd is part of the Connor, Clark & Lunn Financial Group, a multi-boutique asset management firm. For more information, please visit www.ns-partners.co.uk.

About Connor, Clark & Lunn Financial Group Ltd.

Connor, Clark & Lunn Financial Group Ltd. (CC&L Financial Group) is an independently owned, multi-affiliate asset management firm that provides a broad range of traditional and alternative investment management solutions to institutional and individual investors. CC&L Financial Group brings significant scale and expertise to the delivery of non-investment management functions through the centralization of all operational and distribution functions, allowing talented investment managers to focus on what they do best. CC&L Financial Group’s affiliates manage over $104 billion in assets. For more information, please visit www.cclgroup.com.

Contact

Lisa Wilson
Manager, Product & Client Service
Connor, Clark & Lunn Funds Inc.
416-864-3120
[email protected]

The two measures of global “excess” money tracked here remain negative, arguing for a cautious view of equity market prospects. 

Excess (or deficient) money refers to the difference between the actual money stock and the demand for money to support economic transactions. According to “monetarist” theory, a surplus is associated with increased demand for financial / real assets and upward pressure on their prices, assuming no change in supply. 

Excess money is unobservable so two proxies are followed here: the difference between six-month rates of change of global (i.e. G7 plus E7) real narrow money and industrial output; and the deviation of 12-month real narrow money growth from a slow moving average. 

Historically (i.e. over 1970-2021), global equities outperformed US dollar cash on average only when both measures were positive. Unsurprisingly, average performance was worst when both were negative (underperformance of 8.9% pa). These results allow for reporting lags in monetary / economic data. 

The second measure turned negative in October 2021, which was known by end-November. The first measure followed in November, which was known by end-January 2022 (a longer lag because industrial output numbers are released after monetary / CPI data). 

Previous posts noted a recovery in global six-month real narrow money momentum during H2 2022*. With industrial output expected to weaken, it was suggested that the first measure would turn positive, possibly by December. 

The second measure – based on 12- rather than six-month real money momentum – was deeply negative in late 2022, with a switch to positive deemed unlikely before mid-2023. 

The suggested switch positive in the first measure has yet to occur. The six-month rate of change of industrial output crossed below zero in December but remained just above real narrow money momentum – see chart 1. 

Chart 1

Chart 1 showing G7 + E7 Industrial Output & Real Narrow Money (% 6m) highlighting August 2022

Will a cross-over have occurred in January? Partial data suggest that the recovery in real money momentum stalled last month. A reliable January estimate of industrial output won’t be available until mid-March. A reopening bounce in China could offset weakness elsewhere. 

A further point is that the recovery in global real narrow money momentum since mid-2022 partly reflected a strong pick-up in Russia, which may be of limited global relevance given the country’s enforced economic and financial isolation. 

Chart 2 shows the result of replacing Russia with Indonesia in the G7 plus E7 real money calculation from January 2022, before the February invasion of Ukraine**. The trough in real money momentum is placed in October rather than August, with the subsequent recovery even more anaemic. 

Chart 2

Chart 2 showing G7 + E7 Industrial Output & Real Narrow Money (% 6m) highlighting October 2022

*The trough in real money momentum originally occurred in June but is now placed in August, partly reflecting revisions to US CPI seasonal adjustments.

**The other E7 countries (as defined here) are Brazil, China, India, Korea, Mexico and Taiwan.

Gas price relief and Chinese reopening have tempered pessimism about Eurozone economic prospects, contributing to a Q4 rally in equities. Monetary trends, by contrast, suggest a worsening outlook due to the ECB’s scorched earth policy tightening. 

The preferred narrow money measure here – non-financial M1 – contracted for a third straight month in November. The three-month annualised rate of decline of 5.3% compares with a maximum fall of 1.7% during the GFC – see chart 1. 

Chart 1

Chart showing Eurozone Money Measures

Narrow money weakness is being driven by households and firms switching out of overnight deposits into time deposits and notice accounts – a normal pre-recessionary development. Broad money, in addition, is slowing – non-financial M3 rose by only 0.2% in November, pulling three-month annualised growth down to 3.4%, the slowest since 2018. 

The headline M1 and M3 measures are displaying greater weakness, reflecting a fall in money holdings of non-bank financial corporations.

Broad money growth had been supported by solid expansion of bank loans to the private sector but, as expected and signalled by the ECB’s lending survey, momentum is now fading – chart 2. Slumping credit demand and forthcoming QT suggest that broad money will follow narrow into contraction. 

Chart 2

Chart showing Eurozone Bank Loans to Private Sector and ECB Bank Lending Survey Credit Demand Indicator

Corporate loan demand had been boosted by inventory financing but stockbuilding reached a record share of GDP in Q3 – chart 3 – and is probably now being cut back sharply, contributing to a move into recession. Consistent with this story, short-term loans to corporations contracted in both October and November. 

Chart 3

Chart showing Eurozone Stockbuilding as Percent of GDP

A sharp fall in inflation will support real money trends but has yet to arrive. The six-month rate of contraction of real non-financial M1 reached another new record in November – chart 4. 

Chart 4

Eurozone GDP and Real Narrow Money

Monetary tightening in 2007-08 and 2010-11 was associated with a divergence of money trends across countries, reflecting and contributing to financial fragmentation. This is occurring again, with weakness focused on Italy. 

Italian real narrow money deposits contracted by 9.7%, or an annualised 18.4%, in the six months to November, with the larger decline than elsewhere due to both greater nominal weakness and higher CPI inflation – chart 5.

Chart 5

Chart showing Real Narrow Money

In nominal terms, total bank deposits in Italy were unchanged in the year to November – chart 6. Italian banks’ assets grew modestly over this period. The banks funded this expansion by increasing their net borrowing from Banca d’Italia, which in turn accessed additional funding from the Eurosystem, resulting in a further widening of its TARGET2 deficit. The deficit reached a record €715 billion in September following a surge in Italian BTP yields, falling back in October / November – chart 7. Another rise in yields since early December may have been associated with deposit outflows from the banking system and renewed upward pressure on the TARGET2 shortfall. 

Chart 6

Chart showing Bank Deposits of Eurozone Residents

Chart 7

Chart showing TARGET2 Balances

The “monetarist” rule of thumb that broad money growth leads inflation by two years suggests a rapid fall in G7 CPI inflation in 2023 and an undershoot of targets by H2 2024.

Annual growth of the G7 broad money measure calculated here is likely to have fallen below 3% in October, based on US and Japanese data. The money stock appears to have stagnated in the latest three months, with a contraction in the US offsetting weak growth elsewhere*.

The monetarist rule worked perfectly in the early 1970s, when a surge in annual money growth to a peak in November 1972 was followed by a spike in annual CPI inflation to a high exactly two years later – see chart 1.

Chart 1

Chart 1 showing G7 Consumer Prices and Broad Money (% yoy)

Inflation fell sharply from its 1974 peak, mirroring a big decline in money growth in 1973-74. The difference from now is that annual money growth bottomed above 10%, resulting in inflation stalling at a still-high level.

The money growth surge in 2020-21 was almost complete by June 2020 but a final peak was delayed until February 2021. Consistent with the two-year rule, CPI inflation spiked into June 2022, since moving sideways. It may or may not make a final peak but the rule suggests that a major decline will be delayed until after February 2023.

Broad money growth averaged 4.5% in the five years to end-2019. CPI inflation averaged 1.9% in the five years to end-2021 (i.e. allowing for the two-year lag). Money growth returned to the 2015-19 average in June 2022 (4.4%). The monetarist rule, therefore, suggests that inflation will be back below 2% by mid-2024 and will continue to move lower later in the year, reflecting the further decline in money growth since June.

How fast will inflation fall? A reasonable assumption is that its decline will mirror the rapid drop in money growth two years earlier, consistent with the 1970s experience. An illustrative projection is shown in chart 2. Inflation, currently at 7.8% (October estimate), falls to 4% in July 2023 and below 3% by December.

Chart 2

Chart 2 showing G7 Consumer Prices & Broad Money (% yoy) with “Monetarist” Forecast

Some monetarist economists expect inflation to be stickier in 2023. They argue that there is still a monetary “overhang” from the growth surge in 2020-21. Inflation, according to this view, will remain high into H2 2023 to “absorb” this excess. The impact of current monetary weakness will be delayed until 2024-25.

The assessment here is that the overhang is much reduced and its removal is consistent with the optimistic inflation projection shown in chart 2 as long as money trends remain as weak as currently, which is likely.

One measure of the monetary overhang is the deviation of the real broad money stock from its 2010-19 trend. This deviation peaked at 16% in May 2021 and has since narrowed to 6% as inflation has overtaken slowing nominal money growth – chart 3. 

Chart 3

Chart 3 showing G7 Real Broad Money where January 1964 = 100

The projection in chart 3 is based on the inflation profile in chart 2 and an assumption that broad money grows by 2% pa. The deviation of the real money stock from trend falls below 2% in H2 2023 and is eliminated by mid-2024.

Is the assumption of 2% money growth realistic? As noted, there has been no expansion in the latest three months.

As the chart shows, there was a larger deviation of real money from trend than currently at the end of the GFC in 2009. The adjustment back to trend was driven by nominal money weakness rather than high inflation – the money stock contracted by 1.9% between July 2009 and June 2010.

Bank lending has been supporting money growth but central bank loan officer surveys suggest a sharp slowdown ahead: October Fed survey results released this week echo weakness in earlier ECB and BoE surveys – chart 4.

Chart 4

Chart 4 showing US Commercial Bank Loans and Leases (% 6m) with Fed Senior Loan Officer Survey Credit Demand and Supply Indicators* *Weighted Average of Balances across Loan Categories

Continued monetary stagnation – or worse – would confirm that G7 central banks, with the honourable exception of the BoJ, have overtightened policies, compounding their 2020-21 policy error.

G7 monetary gyrations may be contrasted with relative stability around trend in E7** real broad money – chart 5. E7 central bank eased policies conventionally in 2020 and were quick to reverse course as economies rebounded and / or inflationary pressures emerged. This has been reflected in lower average inflation than in the G7 and a faster turnaround – chart 6.

Chart 5

Chart 5 showing E7 Real Broad Money where June 1995 = 100

Chart 6

Chart 6 showing G7 and E7 Consumer Prices (% 6m)

*Money measures used: US M2+ (M2 plus large time deposits and institutional money funds), Japan M3, Eurozone non-financial M3, UK non-financial M4, Canada expanded M2+ (M2+ plus non-personal time deposits).

**E7 defined here as BRIC plus Korea, Mexico and Taiwan.

Photo of Michael Mortimore

Michael Mortimore, NSP’s Client Portfolio Manager spoke to WealthBriefing on how analysis of liquidity cycles can help provide discipline in stock selection and asset allocation.

Michael joined NS Partners in February 2022, and previously worked at Somerset Capital and Macquarie Bank.

In the article, he explains how watching the flow of money from central banks can guide decisions on investing in those economies. He illustrates this theme using current emerging market examples, such as southeast Asia. According to Michael, “Our thinking behind exposure to the region was partly the chance that oil prices will stay high for longer, along with strong commodity prices and supportive money numbers. These markets have had a really good run this year and have recently been a source of cash for us.”

The article was published on August 11, 2022 in WealthBriefing, and was syndicated in WealthBriefing Asia.

Read the full article now.

There are three messages from Eurozone monetary data for May released yesterday.

  1. The region faces a major recession that is likely to extend into early 2023, at least.
  2. Economic prospects are at least as bad for core countries as for the periphery.
  3. Nominal monetary trends are consistent with inflation returning to – or falling below – the 2% target in 2023-24, arguing for an immediate suspension of ECB tightening plans.

The “best” monetary leading indicator of Eurozone GDP, according to ECB research, is real non-financial M1, i.e. holdings of currency and overnight deposits by households and non-financial corporations deflated by consumer prices.

The six-month rate of change of real non-financial M1 turned negative in January and fell further to -1.9% (not annualised) in May, below the lows reached before / during the 2008-09 and 2011-12 recessions – see chart 1.

Chart 1

Chart 1 showing Eurozone GDP & Real Narrow Money* (% 6m) *Non-Financial M1 from 2003, M1 before

Based on longer-run data for real M1, the current rate of real narrow money contraction is the fastest since 1981.

All previous recessions ended only after the six-month rate of change turned positive. The ECB research, meanwhile, found that real narrow money led GDP by three to four quarters on average. The suggestion is that an incipient recession will extend into Q1 2023, at least.

Chart 2 shows six-month rate of changes of real non-financial M1 deposits in the big four economies. (A country breakdown of currency holdings is unavailable.) In a reversal of the pattern before the 2011-12 recession, weakness is more pronounced in Germany and now France than in Spain and Italy. German divergence partly reflects higher inflation but nominal growth of deposits is also weaker in France / Germany than Spain / Italy.

Chart 2

Chart 2 showing Real Narrow Money* (% 6m) *Excluding Currency in Circulation, i.e. Overnight Deposits Only

Eurozone nominal money trends, meanwhile, indicate rapidly improving medium-term inflation prospects. Annual growth of broad money, as measured by non-financial M3, slowed to 4.8% in May, with three-month momentum down to 2.8% annualised, the lowest since 2018 – chart 3.

Chart 3

Chart 3 showing Eurozone Narrow / Broad Money

The slowdown has occurred despite a rise in annual growth in bank loan to a post-GFC high of 5.3% in May. This pick-up does not contradict the negative monetary signal – lending is a coincident or lagging indicator of GDP (confirmed by the ECB research). The coincident / lagging relationship partly reflects a correlation of corporate credit growth with the stockbuilding cycle – demand for short-term loans is strongest as inventories swell at the peak of the cycle. Consistent with this explanation, loans to corporations with a maturity of up to a year grew by an annual 7.0% in May.

The counterparts analysis of M3 shows that the slowdown has been driven by the ending of QE but also a significant balance of payments outflow, reflected in a fall in banks’ net external assets. This outflow is the mirror-image of a basic balance deficit, which has widened as a current account surplus has been wiped out by high energy prices while the Ukraine crisis and other factors have triggered an exodus of capital from the region.

Shorter-term leading indicators are confirming the negative signal for US economic prospects from monetary trends.

An independent calculation of the OECD’s US composite leading indicator suggests another fall in the indicator in June along with upward revisions to declines in prior months – see chart 1.

Chart 1

Chart 1 showing OECD US Leading Indicator* *Relative to Trend, Own Calculation

The indicator is calculated as a ratio to trend, i.e. a decline indicates that output will lag its trend rate of growth. The extent of the shortfall should be related to the speed of descent of the indicator. The current pace has been consistent with a recession historically.

The June indicator estimate incorporates new information for four of the seven components: housing starts, consumer sentiment, stock prices and the yield spread between 10-year Treasuries and Fed funds. Data for the remaining three – durable goods orders, the ISM manufacturing PMI and average weekly hours worked in manufacturing – will be released on 27 June, 1 July and 8 July respectively.

The indicator’s decline is notable for its breadth as well as speed: all seven components have contributed to recent weakness.

The June indicator estimate assumes little change in the three missing components. The ISM PMI could fall significantly. The Philadelphia Fed manufacturing survey for June reported a plunge in new orders (average of current and future balances), mirroring weakness in May’s Richmond Fed survey and suggesting a crash in the ISM orders index – chart 2. The latter has a 20% weight in the PMI and usually leads the other components.

Chart 2

Chart 2 showing US ISM Manufacturing New Orders & Regional Fed Manufacturing New Orders (Average of Current & Future)

A vicious real money squeeze, meanwhile, is intensifying. A weekly broad money measure calculated here was unchanged in nominal terms in early June from its level at the start of the year – chart 3. With consumer prices up by 4.1% over December-May and expected to post another large rise in June, real broad money will have contracted by about 5% (10% annualised) during H1.

Chart 3

Chart 3 showing US Weekly Broad Money Proxy* *Currency in Circulation + Commercial Bank Deposits + Money Funds

Global six-month real narrow money momentum – a key monetary leading indicator of the economy – is estimated to have moved deeper into negative territory in May, suggesting that a likely recession over the remainder of 2022 will extend into early 2023 – see chart 1.

Chart 1

Chart 1 showing G7 + E7 Industrial Output & Real Money (% 6m)

The May estimate is based on monetary data for countries accounting for a combined 65% weight in the G7 plus E7 aggregate tracked here, along with 93% CPI coverage. Missing numbers are assumed to have maintained stable rates of change.

Real money momentum of an estimated -1.2% (not annualised) compares with lows of 0.4% and -0.5% associated with the 2001 and 2008-09 recessions respectively.

Chart 2 shows a longer-term history using G7-only data. The current rate of contraction of G7 real narrow money was reached only twice over the last 50+ years – in 1973 and 1979 before severe recessions. The rate of contraction of real broad money is faster than during those episodes.

Chart 2

Chart 2 showing G7 Industrial Output & Real Money (% 6m)

Global real narrow money weakness intensified in May despite stable growth in China, mainly because of faster US contraction – chart 3. China’s positive monetary divergence may explain recent better equity market performance, with the MSCI China index now outperforming global indices year-to-date – chart 4.

Chart 3

Chart 3 showing Real Narrow Money (% 6m)

Chart 4

Chart 4 showing MSCI Price Indices USD Terms, 31 December 2021 = 100

The fall in global six-month real money momentum in May was driven by a further slowdown in nominal money growth, with six-month CPI inflation stabilising after a January-April surge – chart 5.

Chart 5

Chart 5 showing G7 + E7 Narrow Money & Consumer Prices (% 6m)

CPI momentum will almost certainly fall back in H2 – the relationship in chart 6 suggests that commodity prices would have to rise by a further 50% by December to prevent a decline.

Chart 6

Chart 6 showing G7 + E7 Consumer Prices & Commodity Prices (% 6m)

A CPI slowdown, however, could be offset by further loss of nominal money momentum – unless rising growth in China (22% weight in the G7 plus E7 aggregate) offsets likely weakness in the US / Europe.