Large boardroom with a view and empty chairs.

One of the more intricate events that shareholders must assess is a change in CEO or senior management. Turnover is a reality even at the executive level: every year between 10 and 15% of corporations must appoint a new CEO, a number that is steadily increasing as investors become more actively engaged. The average tenure of an American CEO fell by half to an average of five years between 2000 and 2014. Multiple studies on the matter show how the lack of preparedness for a CEO change is costly to investors.

Despite all this, research shows that most boards are ill-prepared to deal with the transition. A survey of 140 public and private companies by Stanford researchers concluded that at least half of the CEOs surveyed were unable to name their successor, should the need arise now. Furthermore, four in ten companies had no one who could immediately replace the CEO internally. This challenge is compounded further by the changing employment landscape where role and employer changes are more frequent. The typical executive today is expected to work for more than five employers during their career, compared to fewer than three in the 1980s.

It is worth noting that the lack of a successor pipeline also means that underperforming CEOs are kept in their roles longer than they should. This creates a potential conflict of interest for CEOs, where there might be an incentive not to have a clear successor to give them leverage with the board. Given the packed governance agendas, this topic has taken a backseat, but can be just as impactful as any other governance issue.

So how does Global Alpha assess CEO changes within its portfolios? There is no one-size-fits-all approach. Understandably, it is difficult to create a policy that would account for all the factors, including the reason for the CEO’s departure, the state in which the departing CEO leaves the business, insider/founder ownership, etc. Nonetheless, Global Alpha’s idea of a successful succession scenario for its holdings includes but is not limited to the following characteristics:

  • The event is anticipated: The process taking place over a long period not only provides clarity and reassurance to investors, but also implies that this is not the result of a scandal or loss of confidence in the CEO.
  • There is a framework in place: CEO succession is (hopefully) not something that happens regularly. Nonetheless, there needs to be an existing framework that prepares potential successors, even if no transition is expected in the near future. Clear communication of the processes also helps setting expectations for the potential successors. It is estimated that only 50% of companies provide onboarding or transition support to new CEOs.
  • The successor(s) is internally groomed: External candidates are not necessarily worse, but are on average paid more disproportionately and do not benefit from the same knowledge transfer compared to a candidate who was groomed internally over multiple years. Trending upward, roughly 25% of companies looking for a CEO replacement hire externally.
  • The business strategy remains consistent: We invest in companies whose business model we believe in. Although we do not see issues with small shifts in tactics, the overall business strategy should be consistent.

One of the benefits of operating in the global small cap universe is that the CEOs of the companies we invest in are often also the founders. By having more “skin in the game” than an appointed CEO, they also have a vested interest in ensuring a successful transition for their own legacy. Additionally, founders often go on to be board members following the appointment of their successor, which is another way of ensuring that the knowledge and expertise are still available to the new management.

Loomis, a holding in our international and global strategies, is a recent case study in CEO transition. Headquartered in Sweden, the company offers cash management services and transit to banks and retailers. Patrick Andersson, its CEO since 2016, announced his resignation from the role in early 2022 along with his intent to quit within the next year. Within a month, the board was able to replace him with an internal candidate named Aritz Larrea who had been with the company since 2014 in various roles, such as President of Loomis US and Loomis Spain. In addition, Larrea was already a part of Loomis’ executive management team. Despite the abrupt nature of the CEO’s resignation, investors noted a strong internal pipeline, as well as a framework in place to ensure continuity, without having to either hire externally or resort to an interim CEO.

The monetary forecast of global recession in late 2022 / early 2023 appears to be playing out. The latest real money data hint at a bottoming out of economic momentum around end-Q1 2023 but there is no suggestion yet of a subsequent recovery. This message dovetails with cycle analysis, with the stockbuilding cycle now turning down and unlikely to enter another upswing until H2 2023 at the earliest. Global industrial output is expected to contract sharply over the next two quarters with labour market data turning decisively weaker. Below-average nominal money growth, meanwhile, continues to signal major inflation relief in 2023-24. The monetary backdrop has improved for high-quality bonds and may turn less hostile for equities by year-end. A possible strategy is to remain overweight defensive sectors but add to quality / growth exposure on confirmation of monetary improvement. Monetary trends are relatively favourable in China / Japan and Chinese “excess” money could shift from bonds to equities if pandemic policy eases.

Global six-month real narrow money momentum remains significantly negative but appears to have bottomed in June, edging higher in July / August. Assuming that a June low is confirmed, the suggestion is that global industrial output momentum will bottom around March, based on an average nine-month lead at historical turning points. The global manufacturing PMI new orders index might reach a low a month or two earlier – see chart 1. 

Chart 1

Chart 1 showing Global Manufacturing PMI New Orders & G7 + E7 Real Narrow Money (% 6m)

The base case here is that real money momentum will recover into year-end because of a sharp slowdown in six-month consumer price inflation, which could fall by 1-2 percentage points based on current commodity price levels. 

The risk is that an inflation slowdown will be offset by a further weakening of nominal money growth in response to policy tightening. This is not guaranteed and, if it occurs, may be on a smaller scale than the inflation slowdown. Episodes of rising risk aversion are usually associated with an increase in the precautionary demand for money, reflected in a pick-up in narrow aggregates. This “dash for cash” is a negative coincident influence on markets and the economy but a subsequent release of the monetary buffer can drive recovery. (This process may explain a recent rebound in Eurozone three-month narrow money growth.) 

The baseline monetary scenario would suggest a sharp global recession through Q1 2023 followed by a stabilisation in Q2 and some form of recovery in H2. Lagging indicators such as labour market data would continue to deteriorate during H2. This scenario probably represents a best case. 

Similar timings with downside risk are suggested by cycle analysis. The stockbuilding cycle, which averages 3 1/3 years measured between lows, is very likely to have peaked in Q2 – the contribution of stockbuilding to G7 annual GDP growth was the highest since 2010 (a cycle peak year) and in the top 5% of historical readings. A business survey inventories indicator calculated here, which is more timely than the GDP stockbuilding data and leads slightly, plunged in July / August, strongly suggesting that a downswing is beginning – chart 2. 

Chart 2

Chart 2 showing G7 Stockbuilding as % of GDP (yoy change) & Business Survey Inventories Indicator

With the last cycle low in Q2 2020, the average cycle length of 3 1/3 years would suggest another trough in Q3 / Q4 2023. The previous cycle, however, was longer than average, raising the possibility of a compensating shorter cycle and an earlier low in Q2 2023. This would dovetail with the suggestion of the baseline monetary scenario of economic stabilisation in Q2 and a recovery later in 2023. 

As with the monetary analysis, however, the risk is of a later trough and recovery. The concern from a cycle perspective is that the long-term housing cycle may be peaking early. This cycle has averaged 18 years historically and last bottomed in 2009, suggesting another trough around 2027. Weakness is typically confined to the last few years of the cycle but this was not always the case. This year’s interest rate shock may have brought forward the peak, if not shortened the cycle. Housing permits / starts – a long leading indicator – have fallen sharply and further weakness would suggest that a major top is in – chart 3. 

Chart 3

Chart 3 showing G7 Industrial Output Housing Permits / Starts* (% 6m) *Permits for US, Germany, France, Italy; Starts for Japan, UK, Canada

The risk, therefore, is that housing weakness and its lagged effects on the rest of the economy will offset any recovery impetus later in 2023 from a turnaround in the stockbuilding cycle. A rapid reversal in interest rates may be necessary to avert this scenario. 

An unambiguous positive message from the monetary and cycle analysis is that inflation is likely to fall sharply in 2023 and return to target – or below – by 2024. G7 annual nominal broad money growth is below its pre-pandemic average, while the correlation of commodity prices with the stockbuilding cycle suggests further falls into a possible mid-2023 trough – charts 4 and 5. 

Chart 4

Chart 4 showing G7 Consumer Prices & Broad Money (% yoy)

Chart 5

Chart 5 showing G7 Stockbuilding as % of GDP (yoy change) & Industrial Commodity Prices (% yoy)

The weakness of nominal money trends argues that central banks have already overtightened policies but the timing and extent of a “pivot” will hinge on labour market data. The suggestion from consumer surveys is that a shift to weakness is imminent. The G7 indicator shown in chart 6 has moved up significantly from a December 2021 low and led unemployment by an average 6-7 months at previous major troughs. The recent unemployment rate low in July, therefore, may prove to be a significant turning point, with a rise of c.1 pp possible by H2 2023. 

Chart 6

Chart 6 showing G7 Unemployment Rate & Consumer Survey Labour Market Weakness Indicator

The view of market prospects here is informed by two measures of global “excess” money shown in chart 7 – the differential between six-month changes in real narrow money and industrial output and the deviation of the 12-month change in real money from a long-term average. Both measures remain negative currently, a condition historically associated with significant underperformance of global equities relative to US dollar cash. 

Chart 7

Chart 7 showing MSCI World Cumulative Return vs USD Cash & Global “Excess” Money Measures

The first measure, however, has recovered and – based on the above monetary / economic forecasts – may turn positive by year-end. A rise in this measure, even while still negative, has been associated with US Treasuries outperforming cash on average (a fall signalled underperformance).

The current large shortfall of 12-month real narrow money growth from its long-term average suggests that the second measure will remain negative until well into 2023. The possible combination of positive / negative readings for the first and second measures respectively has been associated with modest underperformance of equities on average, although this conceals significant variation. 

Sector / style performance under this combination has been significantly different from the “double negative” regime, with tech, quality and growth tending to outperform, along with non-energy defensive sectors. The best-performing individual sector was health care with financials the worst. Energy also underperformed. 

The Canadian, UK and Australian equity markets were the strongest year-to-date performers at end-Q3 – chart 8. In the case of the former two, however, sector weightings have been a key driver: both have higher-than-average exposure to financials and energy, with the UK also heavy in consumer staples – all outperforming sectors. 

Chart 8

Chart 8 showing MSCI Price Indices Relative to MSCI World, 31 December 2021 = 100

Chart 9 shows the results of recalculating performance using common (MSCI World) sector weights. Canada drops to bottom and the UK is also revealed as an underperformer. 

Chart 9

Chart 9 showing MSCI Price Indices Adjusted for World Sector Weights Relative to MSCI World, 31 December 2021 = 100

The top performance of Australia is consistent with strong real money growth earlier in the year – chart 10. This support, however, has now fallen away. 

Chart 10

Chart 10 showing Real Narrow Money (% 6m)

Real money trends are relatively favourable in China and, to a lesser extent, Japan. Chinese nominal money growth has picked up, partly reflecting money-financed fiscal expansion, while inflation momentum in both countries is weaker than elsewhere. With Chinese activity depressed by pandemic policy, “excess” money has been supporting government / corporate bonds and could flow into equities if and when economic conditions normalise. A large basic balance of payments surplus, meanwhile, has partially insulated the currency from unfavourable movements in interest rate differentials: the RMB index is currently around the middle of its YTD range and stronger than over 2016-late 2021.

Sydney skyline at twilight, with the Sydney Opera House and Harbour Bridge.

Last week, Fedex released their latest reported earnings, depicting grim views of the economy. As a result of the weak quarterly numbers, its CEO to predicts the coming of a recession. Following what could can be defined as the great Covid-related delivery boom, Fedex’s harsh predicted slowdown is understandable.  

Recession thesis accepted, not all sectors and geographies are created equal and understanding the intensity of the recession is an important factor. Let’s look at country level numbers; the following results for the one-year probability of a recession were recently as disclosed in Bloomberg: China 20%, Australia 25%, Japan 30%, Hong Kong 30% US 50%, UK 60%, France 50% and Canada 40%. As data continues to appear, these numbers may prove conservative on the odds of a recession happening, they could however be insightful to find less affected geographies.  

With low inflation and low yen, it’s understandable why Japan can be seen as a favorable defensive jurisdiction.  We should add low valuations for its equities as well. But why is a country like Australia even lower on the recession risk? In fact, if put together Japan and Australia represent 42% of our EAFE developed markets universe and offer a defensive position as we cycle into recession.  Let’s look a bit more why Australia is faring better than other regions. 

The Reserve Bank of Australia is in the midst of its sharpest tightening cycle in a generation, having raised rates by 2.25 percentage points since May. But it’s now approaching a neutral rate, potentially allowing it to return to smaller, quarter percentage-point moves. That compares with the US Federal Reserve, which may deliver a third straight three-quarter-point increase later this month. 

Australia has also been a rare beneficiary of fallout from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as disruptions to commodity and energy supplies have sent coal and other prices soaring. The nation posted a record-high monthly trade surplus this year fueled by sales of coal, iron ore and liquefied natural gas. 

Australia has had a tailwind from trade that other countries just don’t have. The export of LNG and coal have been highly beneficial. Unusually, the surge in export prices isn’t being reflected in Australia’s commodity-linked currency, which has averaged 69 US cents over the past three months. A lower currency swells profits from commodity exports priced in dollars and makes the country more appealing to overseas visitors and students.  

Australia’s employment-to-population ratio is near a record high as is its participation rate — both much stronger than many other countries — highlighting the underlying momentum in the labor market. Job vacancies also remain elevated, suggesting that strength will persist. 

Australians still have plenty of savings to tap into to support consumption, having built up a large amount of cash from fiscal stimulus delivered during Covid lockdowns when there were few options to spend.  

If we look at our holdings in Australia, we are able find companies with world class expertise. As an example, with its vast amount of resources, Australia has very large resource extraction complexes that have trained the most capable pool of experts in material transformation at large scale. 

Alumina (AWC:AU) 

Global Alpha holds Alumina, part owner of the world’s largest alumina business which is the main ingredient to produce aluminum. Most of the alumina produced by company is exported to China. Its Middle East competition better serves the European continent. Although the aluminum/alumina markets weaken during a recession, German aluminum facilities could suffer the most under a gas rationed winter of the Russian war. Alumina is also the lowest cost producer globally and produces the greenest alumina (gas vs coal powered). The company offers a 10% dividend yield and aluminum remains a key component of the climate change infrastructure, automotive as well as the rebounding airline industry. 

Furthering our aluminum discussion, we turn to a pop culture question: aluminum cans versus plastic and glass bottles. We all know for taste it goes glass, can, then plastic. Glass is great, but is expensive to transport and recycle. Aluminum cans are therefore the winner in terms of logistics, recyclability, and carbon footprint. 

Orora (ORA:AU) 

We own Orora, the largest producer of aluminum cans for soft drinks in Australia and New Zealand. The company’s facilities are strategically positioned beside its clients and has pass through agreements with clients on material cost fluctuation. Historically, soft drink consumptions only slightly declines during a recession. Further, Orora clients have indicated 5% yearly growth on capacity requirements for the next several years. There is also leverage in the model as capex is added to existing facilities providing great return in investment. Its dividend yield is above 5% in addition to its growth profile. Although both Alumina and Orora are in the materials sector, Orora has very low commodity exposure providing it with more of a staples profile.

Global six-month real narrow money momentum, the key economic leading indicator in the forecasting approach employed here, is estimated to have moved sideways in deep negative territory in August* – see chart 1. Allowing for an average nine-month lead, the suggestion is that an incipient global recession will extend through Q2 2023, at least. 

Chart 1

Chart 1 showing G7 + E7 Industrial Output & Real Narrow Money (% 6m)

More specifically, global six-month industrial output momentum, which crossed below zero in July and is estimated to have weakened further in August, may continue to fall into April / May next year, with no monetary signal yet of a subsequent slowdown in the pace of contraction. 

The lack of recovery in real narrow momentum is disappointing since, as previously discussed, global six-month consumer price momentum pulled back in July / August. This slowdown, however, was offset by a further fall in nominal money expansion – chart 2. 

Chart 2

Chart 2 showing G7 + E7 Narrow Money & Consumer Prices (% 6m)

Nominal money weakness, encompassing broad as well as narrow aggregates, is evidence that monetary policies were already over-restrictive before the latest round of hair-shirt rate hikes. 

What does this monetary backdrop imply for markets? The two measures of global “excess” money calculated here, i.e. the differential between six-month real narrow money and industrial output momentum and the deviation of 12-month real money momentum from a long-term moving average, remained negative in August – chart 3. 

Chart 3

Chart 3 showing MSCI World Cumulative Return vs USD Cash & Global “Excess” Money Measures

Historically (i.e. over 1970-2021), global equities outperformed cash on average only when both measures were positive, with underperformance greatest when both were negative. 

Previous posts suggested that the first measure would turn positive during H2. This remains possible despite the disappointing August monetary data: the measure has recovered since June as industrial momentum has fallen and output may soon be contracting at a faster pace than real money. 

The second measure, however, is likely to remain negative until well into 2023: 12-month real money momentum weakened further in August and the long-term nature of the moving average implies that it will make little contribution to closing the current wide gap.

The projected development of the measures, i.e. the first crossing back above zero but the second remaining negative, would suggest a slowdown but not reversal in the bear market in late 2023. 

The message for government bond markets is more hopeful. Changes in bond yields have been inversely correlated with changes in the first excess money measure historically, i.e. bonds have, on average, rallied when the measure has risen, even while it has remained negative – chart 4**. 

Chart 4 

Chart 4 showing US Real 10y Treasury Yield (6m change) & Global* Real Narrow Money % 6m minus Industrial Output % 6m (6m change, inverted) *G7 + E7 from 2005, G7 before

The six-month change in the excess money measure turned positive in August, having been negative – implying an unfavourable monetary backdrop for bonds – between November 2021 and July. US 10-year Treasuries have outperformed cash by 4.2% pa on average historically following positive readings. 

*The estimate incorporates monetary data covering two-third of the aggregate and complete CPI results.

**The change in the measure is plotted inverted in the chart.

Dentist medical tools - gloved hand pointing to computer displaying X-ray of teeth and jaw

Since the outbreak of Covid-19 in 2020, we have discussed the impact the pandemic has had on our lives, businesses and markets worldwide in several commentaries. The dental industry, like the whole healthcare sector, was no exception, with massive disruptions taking place, especially in the early months when patients were kept from attending routine check-ups.

Fortunately, the importance of the dental practice was well understood, and dentists have been allowed to resume operations with a set of strict protocols. However, delays caused by the pandemic left many people behind in their dental care. The stress and anxiety experienced during endless lockdowns had people grinding their teeth, further aggravating oral health issues. A friendly reminder that a good rule of thumb is to see a dentist twice a year.

During economic downturns, when consumer sentiment weakens, patients might decide to delay elective procedures. However, demand for essential health treatment remains relatively stable. We find that some healthcare companies present attractive investment opportunities, regardless of the macro environment. As the saying goes, teeth are always in style. A good example of such an opportunity is Dentium, a Korean dental implant manufacturer, and one of the top holdings of our Emerging Markets strategy.

In early-summer of 2000, Jung Sung-Min, a practicing dentist running a clinic in South Korea, established Dentium, a small manufacturer of dental implants and related instruments. Little did he expect that over the next two decades, the company would scale up successfully and capture a significant market share to end up ranking as the second largest in South Korea, and the sixth largest worldwide. Although no longer involved in day-to-day operations after stepping down as CEO and Chairman, the founder remains the largest shareholder of the company.

Dentium’s growth strategy to become a global total dental solutions provider is based on ongoing product innovations and expansion overseas. Clinical data accumulated over the years validates the high quality and solid performance of its products. The company has developed a comprehensive product lineup, expanding to digital dental equipment, including CBCT (cone-beam computed tomography), 3D printers, and CAD/CAM (computer-aided-design and computer-aided-manufacturing) systems. Dentium aims to foster package sales of its solutions, spanning from diagnosis to prosthesis procedures.

Although Dentium faces fierce competition from domestic peers, the company has steadily expanded its market share in South Korea, focusing on penetrating primarily newly opened clinics. Once its equipment is installed, recurring orders of dental implants ensure revenue stickiness, growth visibility and margin expansion. With manufacturing facilities located in South Korea, China, Vietnam, and the United States (U.S.), Dentium has established a global footprint. However, China is not only the largest market for the company, accounting for more than half of revenue, but it is also expected to remain the main growth driver in the medium-to-long term. At the same time, we believe that Dentium’s business in India, the Middle East and Southeast Asia will continue growing faster than the industry average.

The dental implant market globally is expected to exceed US $8 billion by 2028, from US $4.8 billion in 2021, implying a compounded annual growth rate of 7.6%. China, with the number of implants placed per 10,000 people equivalent to only one-tenth of the global average, will likely grow at least twice as fast. South Korea has one of the highest penetration rates of dental implants, is expected to grow at a low-to-mid-single digit annually. The global dental implant market is drifting towards an oligopolistic structure, with the seven largest companies (spearheaded by Straumann and Danaher) accounting for over 80% of sales.

In most regions, Dentium caters primarily to the value segment of the market, while providing products of equivalent quality to global industry leaders, but at more attractive price points. Combined with its rich expertise, strong reputation, consistent execution, and adequate capacity, Dentium’s success in developing countries makes total sense. However, the management team shows no signs of complacency and has set in motion an ambitious plan to become a top 3 operator globally in the next 8 to 10 years, ensuring a growth rate of around 15-20% per annum over this period. Operating leverage and growing efficiencies provide a decent uplift to margins. Thus, the operating margin of 30-35% is not only sustainable, but has some upside and compares very favourably to the 17-20% range recorded in the past.

Like many other businesses with a substantial footprint in China, Dentium faces risks primarily of a regulatory nature. The recent announcement made by the National Healthcare Security Administration of China removes lots of uncertainty and solidifies our investment thesis. Aiming to cut elevated prices at public hospitals (which apparently are higher than the average level of private sector) and educate patients, the Chinese government agency defined a set of rules and procedures to ensure central procurement and price controls at public dental clinics. Although this regulation will inevitably impact the general price level of dental implants in the private sector, Dentium caters primarily to private clinics and is expected to benefit at the expense of its U.S. and European peers, as its pricing is more attractive and highly competitive.

Despite having a highly attractive investment case, the company has huge room for improvement in terms of handling their investor relations. At the same time, it is not widely known among foreign investors, partially because it is not covered by any of the big brokerage firms. However, Dentium’s stock performance has been an outlier this year, outperforming its peers year to date.

Chart showing Dentium’s stock performance
Source: Bloomberg

Despite its outperformance, Dentium still trades at an attractive valuation relative to its historical levels…

Chart showing that Dentium still trades at an attractive valuation relative to its historical levels
Source: Bloomberg

…as well as relative to its peers.

Chart showing that Dentium still trades at an attractive valuation relative to its peers
Source: Bloomberg

 

Following on our last commentary featuring Samsonite (1910 HK), more travel statistics were released confirming the increase in travel. July data shows that Europe, South America and the United States (U.S.) travel spending now exceeds the previous peak of July 2019.

Hotels in Europe saw their revenues per available room (RevPAR) in July grow 78% year-on-year, exceeding July 2019 by 19%. Occupancy rates are still below 2019 by above 5%, but average prices are 25% higher.

Meliá Hotels (MEL SM)

One holding that is very exposed to the European and Caribbean travel market is Meliá Hotels. Meliá is one a leading European hotel groups; it owns and/or manages more than 316 hotels and resorts in 33 countries, mainly in America and Europe, for a total of over 83,772 rooms, 11,854 of which are owned. Of the rooms, 63% are in Europe, 30% in the Caribbean, and 7% in Asia, which is the main reason for future room growth. Resorts account for 60% of hotels (i.e., 100% leisure), with the other 40% are urban, of which half are bleisure (business and leisure) in cities like London, Paris, Rome and Madrid.

Covid has been a huge challenge for companies, particularly in the travel and hospitality business. An important item we look at before investing in any company is the strength of the balance sheet. We want a strong balance sheet with little debt, even if it may appear as not the optimal capital structure. In times of stress, however, that strong balance sheet creates opportunities.  

Let’s contrast two world-class companies in the travel sector — Meliá and Carnival Cruise Line (CCL US):

 Meliá12/201912/2021
Number of hotels326316
Company owned4337
Total rooms83,77883,772
Number of shares outstanding (million)229.7220.5
Total net debt (excl. leases) €M5551,244
Stock price€7.86€6.06 (31/08/2022)
 Carnival Cruise Line11/201911/2021
Number of ships in service105105
Capacity per day248,790248,790
Number of shares outstanding (million)6901123
Total net debt (excl. leases) $M US10,98424,087
Stock price$45.08$9.54 (31/08/2022)
Source: Global Alpha

We can see that Meliá has the same number of rooms and less shares outstanding than at the end of 2019.  The debt, although higher, is still manageable, especially considering that the over 11,000 rooms Meliá owns could be sold and the company could eliminate most or all of the debt outstanding.  As a result, Meliá’s earnings per share, which were €0.64 in 2018, should be higher in 2024.

Meliá’s stock price, although down 23% since the end of 2019, has rebounded 121% since March 18, 2020, and should continue to rebound as results improve.

Carnival Cruise, on the other hand, had to more than double the number of shares outstanding and take on very expensive debt.  As a result, earnings per share, which were $4.49 in 2019, may never reach that level again.  Its stock price has gone down 81% since the end of 2019 and has only rebounded 2.5% since March 18, 2020, most likely a permanent loss of capital.

As investors, we are looking at per share growth. We think like business owners. If we owned the whole business, we would look to grow profits. When we buy shares, we become co-owner of the business and look for the sales and profits attached to each share we own.

Let’s look at this concept of growth per share. Every business is cyclical to a certain extent. What we want is higher highs and higher lows, and we want to avoid a permanent loss of capital.

Brunswick Corp (BC US)

A company we have followed for the last 20+ years and own in our U.S. small cap fund is Brunswick Corp.  Founded in 1845, the company has been manufacturing many recreational products over the years, from pool tables to bowling alleys, before focusing on boats, such as Boston Whaler, Lund or SeaRay and Mercury marine engines.

Source: Bloomberg

Looking at sales figures above, we can see that total sales have only increased slightly since FY2006.

However, shares outstanding have decreased as a result of strong free cash flow used to reduce the number of shares.

Source: Bloomberg

As a result, revenue per share has also increased.

Source: Bloomberg

And so have earnings per share.

Source: Bloomberg

And despite the global financial crisis of 2008 and the Covid pandemic of 2020, owning the shares has been rewarding investors.

Source: Bloomberg
Businesswoman wearing a mask checking the boarding time at a digital timetable at the airport terminal.

Have you been on vacation this summer? It seems everyone is travelling again. Indeed, travel activities have dramatically increased in most regions, except China, as shown by the data conducted by Global Revenue-Passenger Kilometers (RPKs: multiplying the number of paying passengers by the distance travelled).


In previous commentaries, we’ve shared updates on travel-related stocks, such as Melia Hotel (MEL SM) and Autogrill (AGL IM). Both are long-term holdings and niche market leaders. This week, we would like to profile Samsonite, a relatively new holding initiated in November 2020. Although listed in Hong Kong, it is a truly international company present in over 100 countries.

Samsonite International S.A. (1910 HK)

Business Overview

  • Founded in 1910 in Denver, Colorado by the Shwayder Brothers, Samsonite is the world’s largest travel luggage company.
  • It owns many brands, including Samsonite, Tumi, American Tourister, Gregory, High Sierra, Kamiliant, ebags, Lipault, and Hartmann.
  • Before 2012, its business was mainly focused on the Samsonite brand, travel luggage and the wholesale channel. Today, it has a more balanced business with multiple brands through multiple distribution channels.

Target market

Competition

  • A very fragmented market. Other top players are VF Corp, ACE, Delsey, Rimowa, and VIP Industries.
  • Samsonite dominates in most markets, except in India and Japan.

Competitive advantages

  • Samsonite has 17% market share in the global luggage market.
  • Strong brand recognition.
  • A wide range of brands, from mid- to high-end.

Management

  • Kyle Francis Gendreau is the CEO of Samsonite, previously CFO. He joined the company in 2007.
  • Timothy Charles Parker, a turnaround veteran, has been the Chairman since 2011. He owns 3.9% of the company.

ESG

  • Samsonite provides very comprehensive annual ESG reporting.
  • Carbon emission reduction targets: to cut carbon intensity by 15% from 2017 to 2025; to power all operations with 100% renewable energy by 2025.
  • Six out of eight board directors are independent, and one woman sits on the board.

Growth strategy

  • Product: new product innovation.
  • Distribution: focus on Tumi’s international expansion and e-commerce growth.

Recent developments

  • Last week, Samsonite reported very strong 1H earnings, with net sales up 59% year-over-year, driven by North America, Latin America, and Europe.
  • Ample liquidity of US$1.4 billion.
  • It expects a stronger recovery over the rest of 2022, especially from Asia, with price increases and cost savings to help profitability even further.
Office Buildings in Financial District La Defense, Paris, France

Equities have rallied since the low point in June but several headwinds remain, including a slower economic outlook, tightened financial conditions, and the end of the reopening dynamics coupled with an uncertain gas supply in Europe.

Here are some thoughts regarding the European economic landscape and fundamentals behind companies having reported their half year financial results:

  • The majority of European companies have reported their first half results. The levels of earnings beats remains very high. Indeed, the magnitudes of these beats have hit a new records. So far, 69% of companies in STOXX 600 index have reported revenues beating consensus while 17% missed. The revenue beat/miss ratio for this European index reached 4.0x at the end of July versus the 5-year average of 1.7x, according to BNP Paribas Exane Research’s Strategy on August 5, 2022.
  • Amongst other things, European companies have benefited from the reopening of the economy and a weak Euro. Companies that generate a significant portion of their sales in U.S. dollar have experienced a positive translation effect on their top line. Looking at the performance by geographies, sales generated in North America outperformed while sales in China, Northern and Eastern Europe underperformed.
  • Consumer sentiment deteriorates; with real disposable income falling, non-essential purchases like apparel may be impacted. This creates the risk of oversupply and possibly the need for general retailers to offer significant discounts to clear up inventory. Companies like Gap and Walmart have seen an increase in promotional activities. On the other hand, companies exposed to the service side of the economy continues to experience strong consumer demand. Travel and lodging remains a priority.

Resurgence of political risk; the resignation of Italy’s Prime Minister Draghi adds uncertainty to the future fiscal path of Italy and may contribute to higher spreads. The election planned for September 25 will hopefully provide more clarity on the sustainability of the Italian public finances.

Farmer hand holding young plant.

In this week’s commentary, we take a different approach. Written by Sain Godil, Portfolio Manager, he shares how the alchemy of art and science that goes into gardening is similar to Global Alpha’s investment philosophy.

Recession, war, supply disruption, inflation, and Bitcoin crash – it seems that this is much of what you hear in the news these days. Our recent weeklies have focused on how our portfolio is extremely well positioned to benefit in periods of turmoil. We have also talked about how and why small caps tend to outperform in a global recession. So, we don’t need to cover these themes again.

Today’s weekly topic is a bit different. It came to mind while I was tending my garden. Like most people, once the first signs of spring arrive, I begin thinking about what vegetables and flowers to grow.

Gardening has become a hobby of mine because it gets me outside and pulls me away from my digital devices. It allows me to show my kids where food comes from and what goes into growing your own plants. Plus, what’s better than watching seeds transform into a tasty salad you share with your friends and family over a glass of wine?

While I was pruning my tomato plants, it occurred to me there are many similarities between gardening and the Global Alpha investment philosophy. Just like investing, gardening is an alchemy of art and science. You need a proven process, vigilance, and patience to yield fruit. Here’s how I see the parallels.

Step 1 – Preparing the ground

Gardening – It all begins with a vision of where you want to position your garden bed. The type of soil and fertilizer you choose will have a direct impact on the yield you get when the plants bloom later in the summer. Make the wrong choice, and all the time and money you spent goes to waste.

Investing – Similar to gardening, smart investing begins with careful positioning. This can be done via different asset classes, market cap ranges, fundamental or quant-based approaches, etc.

At Global Alpha, we are fundamental managers focused on global small cap. That’s our “fertile ground”. As stock pickers, this strategy gives us an opportunity to identify the best companies out of an available of 11,000 names. By carving out this particular garden patch of the investible universe, we lay the groundwork for fruitful returns for our clients.

Step 2 – Choosing the right plants

Gardening – After preparing the garden bed, you need to decide which plants to grow and where to place them. Each plant needs a specific amount of sun and water to optimize the yield. I learned this firsthand last summer, when I mistakenly placed my pepper plants in the shade and ended the season with only two tiny green peppers (one of which was eaten by a squirrel).

Investing – Just like a garden needs adequate sunlight and water, your portfolio needs companies that can grow revenues and profits much faster than the industry. We achieve this objective by understanding the addressable markets in which our companies operate – and identifying names that are well-positioned to flourish in that environment.

As our companies grow their revenues and earnings, investors can expect healthy out-performance over the long term. On the flip side, if the end market is shrinking, even the most promising company cannot grow. It simply won’t get the nourishment and support needed to thrive.

Step 3 – Care and attention

Gardening – An outdoor garden needs your constant attention. Besides regular watering, you must be on guard against the continuous onslaught of insects and animals that want to gobble up your harvest. Weeding and pruning are also key to optimizing the health and output of your plants. It’s all about staying vigilant.

Investing – At Global Alpha, we are constantly re-evaluating every holding in the portfolio. Our on-the-ground research helps us identify threats our companies may face. By meeting competitors, we get an understanding of the market dynamics and challenges our companies may face in the future. Based on the intel we gather, we prune the portfolio by managing the weights of individual companies. This is how we create a diversified portfolio that adds value in up markets and has superior down market protection. In other words, we know how to weather the storm.

Step 4 – Reaping your rewards

Gardening – All the hard work has paid off, and it’s time to reap your rewards. Nothing compares to the taste of vegetables you grew yourself. And, it’s also the perfect time to reflect on how you’ll optimize your growing process for next year to get an even better harvest.

Investing – Our team spends a lot of time reflecting on what we got right and what could have been improved in the portfolio management process. We are constantly evaluating which other companies and industries we could invest in. It’s all about continuous improvement to deliver the best possible results.

Conclusion

As I write this, the garden I planted in the spring has begun to flourish with kale, spinach, peppers, tomatoes, cucumbers, and herbs. Each year it gets better as I refine my growing process and figure out which pitfalls to avoid (like those sneaky squirrels).

It brings to mind the Global Alpha journey, which began with three founders and has expanded to 14 team members over the past 14 years. Since inception, our continuous refinement of our portfolio management process has helped us consistently outperform the benchmark.

Despite the inevitable changes in the weather, our team continues to learn, adapt, and identify flourishing businesses around the world. Here’s to another 14 years of growth!

Industrial plant at night

The Emergency Plan for Gas for the Federal Republic of Germany was published in September 2019. The third paragraph of the background section states “Germany’s natural gas supply is very secure and reliable”. It goes on to say, “a serious deterioration in supply cannot be ruled out completely… though the likelihood of such a severe crisis in supply actually occurring is very small.” On June 23, Germany announced they were moving to stage two of the three-stage national gas emergency plan due to reduced Russian gas supplies coming from the Nord Stream 1 pipeline. Currently at 58% gas storage levels, the German government is aiming to reach 90% by December.

Stage two does not involve gas rationing. The focus instead is on increased coordination with network providers and mechanisms such as an auction system to incentivize industrial users to slash consumption and sell back unused gas. These measures could come too late for some players as Uniper (UN01.GY) submitted a bailout application for government support due to financial distress (Uniper is not one of our holdings).

Stage two also allows the government to trigger an article of the new energy security law that would allow utility companies « in case of a substantial reduction in gas import volumes » to increase gas prices for companies and households to an « appropriate level » with a notice period of one week. An upward adjustment of retail gas prices could potentially have a double-digit percentage impact on inflation and negatively affect GDP growth due to weaker consumption. This would be an unacceptable situation for the German government. Should energy prices remain elevated, some kind of fiscal response would be needed, either to dampen the impact on retail gas prices or in the form of cut taxes.

By moving to stage two, the risk of advancing to the emergency level (stage three) is also clearly on the table. At stage three, gas rationing would be allowed for unprotected customers, including industrial users. Should gas supplies be interrupted, it is highly likely that Germany would fall into recession. This would be a huge blow to the manufacturing industry, which serves as the engine that drives the German economy. In June, the German Central Bank lowered its forecast for GDP growth in 2022 to 1.9% from 4.2%.

Natural gas provides about 25% of the energy needed for German industry, with over half of coming from Russian imports. Tough decisions would need to be made on which industries would be allocated gas supplies in order to keep producing, and which would be considered dispensable. For example, it would be impractical to turn off large gas-powered furnaces or smelters. Once they cool down, bringing them back up to the required operational temperature would consume even more energy. Switching to another source of power or relocating is also impossible, due to size as well as the environmental and economic cost. If the worst case scenario plays out and some industries do have to shut down in the winter, there would be significant job loss; one study estimates that Germany’s GDP could fall by 12.7%.

There are calls for home owners to have their gas boilers and radiators checked and adjusted to maximize their efficiency, and if possible, to save energy in order to reach the needed storage levels for winter. Vonovia (VNA.GY), one of Europe’s leading private residential housing providers with an estimated 1 million tenants in Germany, has instructed technicians to place a limit on its tenants’ overnight heating systems to 17° Celsius (63° Fahrenheit). (Note, Vonovia is not a Global Alpha holding.)

We will soon know how the gas supply situation will play out for the rest of the year. Regularly scheduled maintenance on the Nord Stream 1 pipeline that runs under the Baltic Sea from Russia to Germany started on July 11. In the past, the shutdown has lasted for approximately 10 days. If the gas flow from Russia does not start up when the maintenance is complete, the discussion around rations will ramp up and limits on hot water for private households should not be ruled out.

Aurubis (NDA.GY)

Our most exposed German holding to gas supply disruption is Aurubis. Aurubis is a leading global producer of non-ferrous metals and one of the largest copper recyclers worldwide. Annually, the company produces more than 1 million tons of copper cathodes as well as a number of other metals and additional products such as sulfuric acid. As an energy intensive business, increased energy prices have had an impact on costs, despite a large part of the company’s energy needs being hedged.

Aurubis can successfully pass on some of the higher energy costs to customers in the form of product surcharges. The biggest risk would be a lack of supply to two of its smelters that are reliant on Russian natural gas. Despite this, the share price weakness so far this year is more related to base metals and copper price in particular declining due to growing concerns over a global economic slowdown on the back of rapid interest rate hikes across the world. We continue to like Aurubis as a play on the secular recycling trend. The company has the multi-metal expertise and network to capitalize on the opportunity that is expected to present itself by way of a significant increase in the supply of complex recycling material.

Our other German holdings are less affected. Evotec (EVT.GY) is a biotech company that is a leading provider of outsourced services for early-phase drug research and development to the pharmaceutical industry. Patrizia (PAT.GY) is one of Europe’s largest real estate asset managers, with about €55billion of assets under management. Finally flatexDEGIRO (FTK.GY) is one of the leading and fastest growing online brokerage businesses in Europe.

While most of the focus has been on Germany, other European countries are affected deeply by the reduced gas supplies. The Global Alpha team is closely following the situation for any signs of escalation.