Artificial Intelligence, or AI, has continued to grow with developments in technology and more funding flooding the sector. In fact, AI has been viewed as a possible solution to combat the slowdown in global GDP. Promising to be a unique productivity tool, AI has attracted attention as a catalyst for global economic growth, particularly as expectations for China’s and Russia’s economies have dwindled. AI’s impact has been significant enough to shift some investors’ focus from dividend-paying stocks to AI-based stocks. During these times of macroeconomic uncertainty, investors have seen more opportunities for gains in AI stocks.

However, despite the positive outlook on the AI sector, global venture funding continues to decline. Quarter over quarter, global venture funding is down 18%, and year over year it has fallen by 49%. If not for the AI sector, which has made up almost a fifth of total global venture funding this year, these percentages would be even higher. Global funding overall has been on the decline for the past four to five quarters, fueled by uncertainty in the macroeconomic landscape and inflation rates. Companies are hesitant to spend capital and engage in other business operations, which has not helped global economic growth.  

In the US, labour markets remain strong and resilient. Private payrolls increased significantly, and continuing claims are low, indicating that workers have been able to quickly find new employment after being laid off. Layoffs have decreased by 31% compared to the first quarter. Regarding monetary policy, the US Federal Reserve decided to keep interest rates unchanged in June. However, given the positive labour market news, this is unlikely a signal of peak interest rates. In the stock market, the trend from the first quarter continued, with big rallies seen in large-cap stocks like Apple, Tesla, Meta and Nvidia while the rest of the market remained relatively flat. Another strong spot in the US economy during this quarter was the construction market due to increased construction spending, employment and easing supply chain issues.  

At face value, Europe’s market underperformed compared to the excitement around large-cap tech stocks seen in the US. However, excluding the “big 7” companies driving S&P 500 Index performance, Europe no longer underperforms. The European market has been cautiously following the US labour market and monetary policies, which have been headwinds for a market lacking the AI craze and large tech companies to invest in. Looking at country specifics, Germany’s economy has struggled to recover in Q2, with industrial production falling 0.2% month over month in May. This indicates ongoing challenges in the country’s industrial sector, worsened by weak global demand from China. In the UK, inflation showed little sign of slowing, reaching 8.7% in April, higher than the expected 8.2%. Inflation seems to be more persistent in the UK compared to other high-income economies, and the Bank of England’s efforts to curb inflation have impacted the housing market.  

In Japan, the macroeconomic market has been relatively stable, with the Bank of Japan leaving its monetary policy unchanged in April. The central bank’s new governor is electing to support fragile economic growth through accommodative policies and expects inflation to moderately recover in the second half of 2023. Japan’s re-opening post COVID has led to accelerated retail sales due to pent-up demand, and the service sector is gaining momentum with borders reopening and strong consumer spending. Inbound tourism has also played a significant role in driving the economy, with the number of foreign nationals staying in accommodation facilities in Japan exceeding 10 million in April for the first time since January 2020 according to the Japan Times. A similar recovery story can be seen in Hong Kong, where China’s reopening has driven economic growth through inbound tourism and domestic demand.  

BACK TO GLOBAL SMALL CAP 

During the second quarter, the MSCI World Small Cap Index underperformed the MSCI World Large Cap Index but outperformed the MSCI Emerging Markets Index.  

Within the MSCI World Small Cap Index, information technology, which represents 12.0% of the Index, was the strongest-performing sector, delivering a 6.7% return. Communication services was the worst-performing sector, returning -2.2% for the quarter, with an Index weight of 3.0%.  

GLOBAL ALPHA PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS 

Over the same timeframe, our Global Small Cap composite delivered a 0.1% gross return (-0.1% net), underperforming the MSCI World Small Cap Index by 3.1% gross (3.3% net).  

Radnet Inc. (RDNT US) was our top performer for the quarter. Founded in 1984, this radiology firm operates imaging centres and is the largest provider of outpatient imaging services in the US.  

So, what drove the stock up?  

Coming into 2023, the company was already seen as a winner of the softening labour market, with expectations of increased margins, volume and cyclical tailwinds. However, the real driving force was the development in its AI segment, which was initially presented by management as an additional productivity tool, despite being loss-making at the time. Now, it is on the verge of becoming a breakeven business capable of drastically improving margins and scalability. This development also supports the introduction of new services like the Early Breast Cancer Detection Program (EBCD). We remain positive on Radnet as a long-term holding with plenty of upside. 

Another top contributor last quarter was Eagle Materials (EXP US), a manufacturer of construction materials used in residential, commercial and infrastructure applications. The company produces cement, wallboard, paperboard, concrete and other aggregates. We like Eagle Materials due to its status as one of the low-cost producers, providing it a competitive advantage. The company is uniquely positioned to leverage its distribution and sales network to secure new business. It also stands to benefit from the long-term trend of increased demand for housing, which further bolsters its growth prospects. 

What drove the stock up?  

Cement pricing once again demonstrated strength due to limited supply and the potential tailwind from the infrastructure bill. As a result, the segment was expected to be a significant driver of earnings growth. Concerns, however, lingered around the wallboard segment, given the slowdown in residential housing. Nevertheless, the company was able to beat expectations thanks to pricing performance. Additionally, the company maintained a solid balance sheet, supporting a 9% free cash flow yield.  

Our top detractor for the quarter was PRA Group (PRAA US) headquartered in Norfolk, Virginia. One of the largest publicly traded distressed consumer debt buyers in the US, the company buys written-off credit card receivables and other debts, and subsequently collects on them. Essentially, PRA buys debt for $0.05 to $0.10 on the dollar and recovers $0.12 to $0.14.  

What drove the stock down?  

PRA’s new CEO published results that came in well below expectations, attributing it to a combination of weak numbers, one-off events, investment expenses and delayed revenue recognition into Q2. Cash collections were down 14%, while purchases also declined sequentially. Furthermore, PRA’s core US market was soft across the board. 

Nonetheless, PRA remains well-positioned in a space that is likely to perform well in an unfavourable economic environment. Relative to competitors, PRA carries comparatively lower leverage and faces fewer challenges in buying bad debts. Banks are increasingly looking to sell their paper to grow earnings per share (EPS) and clean up their balance sheets. Meanwhile, PRA has been aggressively buying back 14% of its shares outstanding since 2021 and remains among the best positioned within the industry to benefit from tightening financial conditions. We maintain a positive outlook on the company’s growth prospects.  

NEW POSITION 

We finished the quarter with a new position in Keywords Studios (KWS LN), an Ireland-based company dominating the fragmented market of video game outsourcing. With over 70 studios in 26 countries operating across eight different lines of business and three development divisions, Keywords scale is unmatched, three times larger than its closest competitors, yet it only holds a 6% market share. It offers a comprehensive range of services covering various developer requirements, including audio services, customer support for live games, marketing and social media management and bug testing. 

While Keywords has long been highly regarded in the video game small-cap space, its valuation had been a deterrent to investment despite its strong niche positioning and favourable business model. However, toward the end of April, the company’s name surfaced in Bank of America’s AI loser basket, suggesting that most of Keywords’ services would eventually be brought in-house by game developers due to advancements in AI technology, reducing the need for human labour. This sent the company’s share price on a downward spiral. The negative momentum continued as index weight adjustments, loss cutting and quant signals further impacted the stock. 

Upon closer examination, we saw that the market had misunderstood the situation, leading to indiscriminate selling of services companies like Keywords. Contrary to the perception that Keywords was unprepared for the AI revolution, the company had been proactively investing in AI technologies for at least a year before ChatGPT became a household name. It had already incorporated AI solutions into various aspects of its operations, enhancing localization services through Kantan AI, optimizing customer support via Helpshift and improving quality testing expertise with the aid of Mighty Games. Furthermore, Keywords holds a significant advantage in exposing its machine learning systems to a variety of games, languages and coding requirements. This advantage stems from its unmatched scale, making it virtually impossible for individual video game developers to replicate. 

The decision to invest in Keywords instead of a game developer that owns its own intellectual property (IP) stems from several factors. The global video game market is highly susceptible to hits and misses, creating risks for developers and leading to revenue lumpiness. This is especially pronounced in the small-cap space where companies typically have limited IP and release only a few games annually. Significant ramp-up time is involved in new projects, with game developers not reaching the same development stage as the audio or functional testing teams. There may be underutilization of employees and inefficiencies. In such an environment, the outsourcing trend is increasingly prevalent across video game companies of all sizes, with the aim of optimizing development resources. Keywords plays a crucial role in this landscape, offering consistent workload to its studios by working closely with top gaming companies worldwide. Furthermore, the company benefits from building a unique breadth of expertise through exposure to a wide variety of games without the burden of managing its own IP or taking risks associated with the success or failure of a single title.  

Our investment in Keywords allows us to capitalize on the growth of the video game industry without making a call on specific titles or the medium on which they are consumed. By recognizing the company’s strengths, strategic positioning and the ongoing trend toward outsourcing, we believe Keywords offers an attractive opportunity with the potential for long-term success. 

OTHER NEW BUYS AND SELLS 

During the quarter we also added a new position in Digi International Inc. (DGII US), while exiting our positions in Motorcar Parts of America (MPAA US) and AudioCodes Ltd. (AUDC IS). 

WHAT IS OUR EAR-TO-THE-GROUND APPROACH TELLING US? 

Global Alpha has been back on the road with company meetings and conferences. Across the multiple regions we cover, we have found mixed signals from management teams in various industries in the first quarter. Despite companies’ continued ability to pass on price increases and overall strong labour markets, there are still concerns around the weak resurgence of the Chinese consumer, persistent inflation, the impact of rate hikes on liquidity and continued geopolitical tensions. 

The flight to safety that followed the fall of Silicon Valley Bank was short lived as the risk-on attitude resumed in the second quarter. Big tech dominance on US stock market returns so far this year has resulted in almost everything non-speculative falling out of favour. Apple alone is worth more than the entirety of the Russell 2000 or the UK’s 100 biggest listed companies. Nvidia’s valuations have reached levels not seen since the dotcom bubble, leading it to join the $1 trillion market-cap club. This situation is reminiscent of 2020, where every speculative stock was priced for perfection. 

In this environment, we are sticking to our strategy of investing in companies with little debt and strong cash flow generation, as well as those aligned with well-defined secular trends that will drive growth for years to come. We believe this volatile environment will provide active asset managers with opportunities to add value, but it is likely to be a wild ride. 

We are not making significant sector or country adjustments to the portfolio based on these expectations. Instead, we are maintaining a diversified list of holdings with defensible business models that are trading at a discount to their intrinsic value. Our portfolio remains well-diversified across the many countries, currencies and industries that comprise our benchmarks. 

The Global Alpha team

Photo is aerial view of Tokyo cityscape with Fuji mountain

Artificial Intelligence, or AI, has continued to grow with developments in technology and more funding flooding the sector. In fact, AI has been viewed as a possible solution to combat the slowdown in global GDP. Promising to be a unique productivity tool, AI has attracted attention as a catalyst for global economic growth, particularly as expectations for China’s and Russia’s economies have dwindled. AI’s impact has been significant enough to shift some investors’ focus from dividend-paying stocks to AI-based stocks. During these times of macroeconomic uncertainty, investors have seen more opportunities for gains in AI stocks. 

However, despite the positive outlook on the AI sector, global venture funding continues to decline. Quarter over quarter, global venture funding is down 18%, and year over year it has fallen by 49%. If not for the AI sector, which has made up almost a fifth of total global venture funding this year, these percentages would be even higher. Global funding overall has been on the decline for the past four to five quarters, fueled by uncertainty in the macroeconomic landscape and inflation rates. Companies are hesitant to spend capital and engage in other business operations, which has not helped global economic growth.  

In the US, labour markets remain strong and resilient. Private payrolls increased significantly, and continuing claims are low, indicating that workers have been able to quickly find new employment after being laid off. Layoffs have decreased by 31% compared to the first quarter. Regarding monetary policy, the US Federal Reserve decided to keep interest rates unchanged in June. However, given the positive labour market news, this is unlikely a signal of peak interest rates. In the stock market, the trend from the first quarter continued, with big rallies seen in large-cap stocks like Apple, Tesla, Meta and Nvidia while the rest of the market remained relatively flat. Another strong spot in the US economy during this quarter was the construction market due to increased construction spending, employment and easing supply chain issues.  

At face value, Europe’s market underperformed compared to the excitement around large-cap tech stocks seen in the US. However, excluding the “big 7” companies driving S&P 500 Index performance, Europe no longer underperforms. The European market has been cautiously following the US labour market and monetary policies, which have been headwinds for a market lacking the AI craze and large tech companies to invest in. Looking at country specifics, Germany’s economy has struggled to recover in Q2, with industrial production falling 0.2% month over month in May. This indicates ongoing challenges in the country’s industrial sector, worsened by weak global demand from China. In the UK, inflation showed little sign of slowing, reaching 8.7% in April, higher than the expected 8.2%. Inflation seems to be more persistent in the UK compared to other high-income economies, and the Bank of England’s efforts to curb inflation have impacted the housing market.   

In Japan, the macroeconomic market has been relatively stable, with the Bank of Japan leaving its monetary policy unchanged in April. The central bank’s new governor is electing to support fragile economic growth through accommodative policies and expects inflation to moderately recover in the second half of 2023. Japan’s re-opening post COVID has led to accelerated retail sales due to pent-up demand, and the service sector is gaining momentum with borders reopening and strong consumer spending. Inbound tourism has also played a significant role in driving the economy, with the number of foreign nationals staying in accommodation facilities in Japan exceeding 10 million in April for the first time since January 2020 according to the Japan Times. A similar recovery story can be seen in Hong Kong, where China’s reopening has driven economic growth through inbound tourism and domestic demand.  

BACK TO INTERNATIONAL SMALL CAP 

During the second quarter, the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index underperformed the MSCI EAFE Large Cap Index and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index.  

Within the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, utilities, which represents 2.9% of the Index, was the strongest-performing sector, delivering a 6.2% return. Energy was the worst-performing sector, returning -3.4% for the quarter, with an Index weight of 2.8%.  

PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS 

Over the same timeframe, our International Small Cap composite delivered a -2.8% gross return (-3.0% net), underperforming the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index by 3.4% (-3.6% net).  

Our top performer for the quarter was Iwatani Corp. (8088 JP), a prominent distributor of gases used in industrial and household applications in Japan. Iwatani is Japan’s largest provider of LPG, hydrogen and helium and the only company in Japan with a fully integrated hydrogen supply network that includes manufacturing, transportation, storage and security.  

Given Japan’s historical lack of significant reserves of natural resources such as oil or natural gas, the country has heavily relied on imports to meet energy demands, making energy an important political topic. It is no surprise that Japan was the first country to adopt a hydrogen strategy back in 2017. It now boasts the largest hydrogen station network, with 160 stations in operation as of 2020 and targeting over 900 by 2030. Iwatani is well-positioned to reap the benefits as a primary beneficiary of this hydrogen infrastructure expansion. 

So, what drove the stock up?  

Iwatani’s outperformance was driven by a few factors. Firstly, the Japanese government has revised its basic strategy for hydrogen, aiming to increase the annual supply to 12 million tons by 2040, six times the current level. This ambitious plan bodes well for Iwatani, given its role as a significant player in the hydrogen market. Secondly, Iwatani’s release of its new mid-term plan contributed to its success. The plan outlined growth targets and strategies, with a particular focus on hydrogen, low-carbon initiatives and overseas expansion projects. Notably, the plan also highlighted the company’s commitment to improving shareholder returns.  

Another top contributor last quarter was Sega Sammy Holdings (6460 JP), a company formed through the merger of game publisher SEGA and pachislot and pachinko machines manufacturer Sammy Corporation in 2004. Sega Sammy now owns several facility-centered businesses, including amusement centers and resorts. The share price was hit at the onset of the pandemic due to travel restrictions and lockdown measures. However, Sega Sammy owns strong and long-lasting franchises such as Total War and Sonic and has a solid history of monetizing them, providing them with a consistent back catalogue. As one of the world’s top game publishers based on reviewers’ ratings, Sega Sammy continues to be a prominent player in the gaming industry.  

What drove the stock up?  

Sega Sammy’s return for the quarter was primarily driven by strong earnings, with notable 21% revenue growth led by its pachislot and pachinko machine business. Sales of new titles such as Sonic Frontiers and Persona 5 Royal were also strong. The company’s announcement of its plan to release a new Sonic game, Sonic Superstars, in fall 2023 further contributed to its positive momentum, building on the success of its previous Sonic release. Finally, Sega’s strategic move to acquire Rovio Entertainment, the video game maker of Angry Birds, adds diversification to its existing portfolio, with minimal overlap in terms of geographies. This acquisition aligns well with Sega’s global expansion and reinforces our existing conviction in the company’s strengths.  

Our top detractor for the quarter was Vitasoy International Holdings (0345 HK). Vitasoy is a leading manufacturer and distributor of non-carbonated beverages and food based in Hong Kong. Known as the “soy expert”, the company boasts a wide distribution network covering more than 200 products in over 40 countries. 

Given the estimated worth of the global soy food market at over $58 billion in 2021, with a projected CAGR of 7%, Vitasoy is well-positioned to capitalize on the growing middle class in emerging markets and increased awareness of the health benefits of soy food. Its strong brand presence further contributes to its leading market share in the sector. 

What drove the stock down?  

The company’s earnings fell short of estimates due to a slower-than-expected recovery in Mainland China and ongoing cost pressures. Furthermore, the resignation of its China General Manager in April 2023 led to the CEO stepping in temporarily until a suitable replacement is found. On the positive side, the China segment returned to profitability, and the company plans to expand its shelf space while implementing measures to reduce staff turnover to accelerate the business’s recovery. Vitasoy is a familiar name to our team, and we are confident that its growth strategy, which centres on the Chinese consumer, remains intact. 

NEW POSITION 

We finished the quarter with a new position in Keywords Studios (KWS LN), an Ireland-based company dominating the fragmented market of video game outsourcing. With over 70 studios in 26 countries operating across eight different lines of business and three development divisions, Keywords scale is unmatched, three times larger than its closest competitors, yet it only holds a 6% market share. It offers a comprehensive range of services covering various developer requirements, including audio services, customer support for live games, marketing and social media management and bug testing. 

While Keywords has long been highly regarded in the video game small-cap space, its valuation had been a deterrent to investment despite its strong niche positioning and favourable business model. However, toward the end of April, the company’s name surfaced in Bank of America’s AI loser basket, suggesting that most of Keywords’ services would eventually be brought in-house by game developers due to advancements in AI technology, reducing the need for human labour. This sent the company’s share price on a downward spiral. The negative momentum continued as index weight adjustments, loss cutting and quant signals further impacted the stock. 

Upon closer examination, we saw that the market had misunderstood the situation, leading to indiscriminate selling of services companies like Keywords. Contrary to the perception that Keywords was unprepared for the AI revolution, the company had been proactively investing in AI technologies for at least a year before ChatGPT became a household name. It had already incorporated AI solutions into various aspects of its operations, enhancing localization services through Kantan AI, optimizing customer support via Helpshift and improving quality testing expertise with the aid of Mighty Games. Furthermore, Keywords holds a significant advantage in exposing its machine learning systems to a variety of games, languages and coding requirements. This advantage stems from its unmatched scale, making it virtually impossible for individual video game developers to replicate. 

The decision to invest in Keywords instead of a game developer that owns its own intellectual property (IP) stems from several factors. The global video game market is highly susceptible to hits and misses, creating risks for developers and leading to revenue lumpiness. This is especially pronounced in the small-cap space where companies typically have limited IP and release only a few games annually. Significant ramp-up time is involved in new projects, with game developers not reaching the same development stage as the audio or functional testing teams. There may be underutilization of employees and inefficiencies. In such an environment, the outsourcing trend is increasingly prevalent across video game companies of all sizes, with the aim of optimizing development resources. Keywords plays a crucial role in this landscape, offering consistent workload to its studios by working closely with top gaming companies worldwide. Furthermore, the company benefits from building a unique breadth of expertise through exposure to a wide variety of games without the burden of managing its own IP or taking risks associated with the success or failure of a single title.  

Our investment in Keywords allows us to capitalize on the growth of the video game industry without making a call on specific titles or the medium on which they are consumed. By recognizing the company’s strengths, strategic positioning and the ongoing trend toward outsourcing, we believe Keywords offers an attractive opportunity with the potential for long-term success. 

OTHER NEW BUYS AND SELLS 

During the quarter we also initiated new positions in Netcompany Group, Kelsian Group and Tate & Lyle PLC

We exited AudioCodes Ltd. during the quarter.  

WHAT IS OUR EAR-TO-THE-GROUND APPROACH TELLING US? 

Global Alpha has been back on the road with company meetings and conferences. Across the multiple regions we cover, we have found mixed signals from management teams in various industries in the first quarter. Despite companies’ continued ability to pass on price increases and overall strong labour markets, there are still concerns around the weak resurgence of the Chinese consumer, persistent inflation, the impact of rate hikes on liquidity and continued geopolitical tensions. 

The flight to safety that followed the fall of Silicon Valley Bank was short lived as the risk-on attitude resumed in the second quarter. Big tech dominance on US stock market returns so far this year has resulted in almost everything non-speculative falling out of favour. Apple alone is worth more than the entirety of the Russell 2000 or the UK’s 100 biggest listed companies. Nvidia’s valuations have reached levels not seen since the dotcom bubble, leading it to join the $1 trillion market-cap club. This situation is reminiscent of 2020, where every speculative stock was priced for perfection. 

In this environment, we are sticking to our strategy of investing in companies with little debt and strong cash flow generation, as well as those aligned with well-defined secular trends that will drive growth for years to come. We believe this volatile environment will provide active asset managers with opportunities to add value, but it is likely to be a wild ride. 

We are not making significant sector or country adjustments to the portfolio based on these expectations. Instead, we are maintaining a diversified list of holdings with defensible business models that are trading at a discount to their intrinsic value. Our portfolio remains well-diversified across the many countries, currencies and industries that comprise our benchmarks. 

The Global Alpha team

China stimulus?

Last quarter, we wrote an optimistic comment on China’s economy driven by encouraging Q1 economic data. Nevertheless, 2Q posted a slowdown in most relevant metrics that was harsher than expected. The official manufacturing PMI dropped below 50 in both April and May, inflation has lowered to almost 0% and 2Q GDP growth came out much lower than expected. Consumption is still weak, with the youth unemployment rate at over 20% and the property market has worsened again.

This data comes amid a lack of confidence in the Chinese economy driven by lack of policy support. As the slowdown has been stronger than expected, we’ve seen weak consumption and increasing savings among locals. The latter needs to change, and the tipping point comes solely from government stimulus.

The PBOC governor reinstated in June the necessity of counter-cyclical adjustment after eliminating it from its statements in April. Authorities have implemented some policy supports, such as lowering focalized interest rates, targeted easing on property and some subsidies for NEVs and home appliances. This is far from enough; new measures are needed on all fronts, particularly in fostering credit and in the property sector.

Historically, in China, various policy measures tend to move in the same direction at the same time. Thus, it’s reasonable to expect more easing in different areas as data continues to be weak. It is possible, but difficult to foresee, that Chinese policymakers will not achieve their growth target of around 5% and fail for a second consecutive year. This has never happened in history and China has the tools to prevent it if it wants. Policymakers have control over commercial banks and can set up policies for property and infrastructure through their control of local governments. It’s key for the government to resume a credit upcycle. Economy recovery in 2009, 2012 and 2016 was preceded by a credit impulse, driven by policy easing in infrastructure and property.

The Politburo meeting held during the last weekend of July had a change of tone with a more constructive bias, although we are still missing concrete measures.

India’s market had a very good quarter, reverting its 1Q underperformance. Despite well-known expensive valuations, small-cap companies have shown impressive resilience and strong growth momentum likely to be maintained. India is currently the most important market in our index, and we continue to expect strong growth in our companies for the mid-long term. For example, companies like Phoenix Mills (PHNX IN) are likely to post +20% CAGR EPS growth for the next five years, driven by solid execution and margin expansion.

Latin America reported a strong 2Q, maintaining the trend of previous quarters. The region is experiencing positive tailwinds, such as nearshoring in Mexico and the starting of the rates easing process during 2H. Brazil’s market performed extremely well due to positive results expectations for 2H, amid discounted valuations, normalization of local dynamics together with rate cut expectations for 2H. The Latin America region is also favoured by commodities prices, which, despite a global slowdown, have maintained elevated levels, especially copper, with the expectation of supply mismatches to continue. We are overweight in Latin America, driven by our bottom-up selection of companies that we expect to continue delivering strong results in the following quarters.

Our Global Alpha EM portfolio is also overweight in China, Mexico, Indonesia and Poland, although selectively. In China, we focus mainly on the consumer front and manufacturing, on local brands and companies that serve the Chinese population and industrial automation. In Indonesia, our invested companies are in the consumer and healthcare sectors. In Mexico, our focus is on companies that can benefit directly from nearshoring but also leverage their strong domestic operations. In Poland, we have recently initiated positions in the materials and industrial sectors. In all cases, we favour companies with good balance sheets, strong free cash flows and market leadership and our portfolio continues to be well diversified.

BACK TO EMERGING MARKETS SMALL CAP

During the second quarter, the MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index outperformed the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index.

Within the MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index, financials, which represents 9.9% of the index, was the strongest-performing sector, delivering a return of 10.3%. At the opposite end of the spectrum, energy was the worst-performing sector, returning -2.4% for the quarter, with an index weight of 1.8%.

PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

For the second quarter, our Emerging Markets Small Cap composite delivered a return of 10.2% gross (9.9% net), outperforming the MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index by 3.8% gross (3.5% net).

Our top performer for the quarter was JSL (JSLG3 BZ). The company has the largest portfolio of logistics services in Brazil and extensive expertise operating across various sectors with a nationwide scale of operations. JSL has forged long-lasting and strong business relationships with clients in diverse economic sectors, including pulp and paper, steel, mining, agribusiness, automotive, food, chemical and consumer goods, among others. Remarkably, it has maintained its leadership for 19 years and it significantly surpasses its closest competitor in size and scope.

So, what drove the stock up?

The main reason for the strong performance is the company’s consistent delivery, not only in 1Q23 but also for eight quarters in a row. Organic growth has consistently been close to 20% since its IPO and JSL has also demonstrated a favourable M&A track record that has contributed to EPS expansion. Among the top 10 logistic companies in Brazil, JSL holds close to a 2% market share. JSL’s market share is approximately 1%, nearly five times larger than the second-largest player), positioning it well to continue consolidating the industry. Additionally, JSL’s stock continues to trade at discounted valuations.

Another top contributor in 2Q was Va Tech Wabag (VATW IN). The company is a global player in the water treatment industry with a market presence in India and several other geographies. VATW offers comprehensive life cycle solutions, including conceptualization, design, engineering, procurement, supply, installation, construction and O&M services for sewage treatment, processed and drinking water treatment, effluent treatment, sludge treatment, desalination and reuse for institutional clients.

What drove the stock up?

The main catalyst for the stock was the company’s confirmation of the long-awaited project for the desalinization water treatment plant in Chennai, which increased the order book by close to 40%. Moreover, VATW is now focused on securing E&P projects and streamlining construction to improve margins and cash collection. All of the above factors have boosted sentiment on the stock and we expect good results to continue.

Our top detractor in 2Q 2023 was Sido Muncul (SIDO IJ), Indonesia’s largest herbal medicine company. Its product portfolio includes over 300 SKUs, with notable products like Tolak Angin, the number one herbal remedy for cold symptoms with a market share of 72%, and Kuku Bima Ener-G!, a pioneer in fruit-flavoured energy drinks with a 40% market share in Indonesia.

What drove the stock down?

Sido’s stock price was subdued by soft 1Q23 business results, impacted by inflationary pressure on low-income consumers, a focus on travelling and leisure by middle and upper-income consumers, as well as regulatory restrictions affecting Sido’s pharma segment. Despite the slow performance in 1Q23, we maintain conviction in Sido based on its brand strength, market dominance, distribution channel expansion in Indonesia and abroad, and a promising new product launch pipeline.

NEW POSITION

One of the new positions we initiated this quarter was InPost (INPST NA). The company provides parcel delivery services in Poland, France, the UK, Spain, Portugal, the Benelux countries and Italy through a combination of 30,000 APMs (automated parcel machines) and 26,000 PUDO (pick-up drop-off) points, as well as door-to-door delivery. APMs represent a more cost-efficient (~30% cheaper) and environmentally friendly option (~75% lower carbon footprint) compared to traditional door-to-door delivery.

InPost’s logistics infrastructure in Poland is underpinned by a highly efficient technology platform and comprises first, middle and last-mile capabilities, solidifying its dominant position in a dynamically growing market.

While Poland remains the core business for InPost today, its growth opportunities for the next decade lie in France and the UK, the two out of three largest e-commerce markets in Europe.

In 2021, InPost entered France via the acquisition of Mondial Relay, obtaining a 20% market share in the parcel delivery business. Although UK operations are still on their way to break even, the recently announced 30% acquisition of a local logistics provider, Menzies Distribution, represents a major milestone in InPost’s efforts to secure its proprietary logistics infrastructure in that country.

In 2022, InPost delivered approximately 750 million parcels across its markets.

OTHER NEW BUYS AND SELLS

During the quarter, we also initiated a new position in Greenpanel Industries, Tokai Carbon Korea and Copa Airlines.

We exited Integrated Diagnosis Holdings, Network International, AfreecaTV and Dynasty Ceramic.

WHAT IS OUR EAR-TO-THE-GROUND APPROACH TELLING US?

Global Alpha was back on the road with company meetings and conferences in the first half of 2023. During 2H, we will continue attending conferences, aiming to visit in person almost 100% of our holdings.

The lower dynamism of the recovery in China has cast some doubts on consumer spending, and earnings growth has been, on average, revised downwards for this year. As mentioned in the introduction, we expect stimulus to come, thus we are monitoring every signal from policymakers who have started to be more concerned.

In India, our conversations with companies and local references still account for strong earnings momentum in mostly all our holdings. This is in line with the message we received during our visit to Mumbai in February. Amid the global slowdown, we will pay close attention to monitoring this solid expected growth in FY24, considering well-known high valuations. It is also relevant to monitor inflation data, considering the last report was higher than expected.

This spring, we were in Dubai for the largest conference dedicated to companies in the MENA region. The city was visibly in the midst of an upcycle and we met 30+ companies over four days.

Saudi Arabia and the UAE are coming off an IPO boom and there were plenty of newly listed companies at the conference. The market lacks depth compared to other emerging markets, but we could clearly see the impact of a concerted policy push to invite more FDI, encourage more IPOs and build a deeper capital market. We met a few family-owned companies that have recently gone public with the intent to professionalize management and diversify into new segments. Almost all companies across sectors were bullish on Vision 2030 and its impact on the region. Diversifying the economy while oil prices remain strong remains top priority.

We also had the opportunity to meet the top central banker from Egypt, Gov Hassan Abdalla. After two devaluations, Egypt remains hungry for FX (USD) with its main source of FX being the Suez Canal, tourism and exports. There is now a concerted push to reduce dependence on these traditional sources of FX by pursuing FDI via stake sales in publicly owned companies. Apart from FX, containing inflation and moving to a flexible exchange rate remain the other top priorities for the governor.

In June, we made an insightful trip to Poland, where we explored its dynamic investment landscape and remarkable progress the country has achieved since its establishment as a democratic state. The country’s strategic location, skilled workforce, EU membership and market-oriented reforms in the last decade made it attractive for investors. Poland offers a large consumer market, a thriving start-up ecosystem and has attracted major players in the EV battery and semiconductors industries. However, concerns about inflation, political uncertainties and the ongoing war in Ukraine pose challenges. During the visit, our team engaged with our holding companies, explored new ideas and participated in consumer and technology conferences. One of the corporate meetings served as a confirmation for a new position initiated in July.

In Korea, we continue to be surprised by the development of companies linked to EV batteries. In general, we believe that the sector has run beyond its fundamentals. We must remember that some stocks linked to the sector are up more than 100% in the year; however, a large part of their profits will come from 2025 onward and it is still very difficult to determine their magnitude. However, we cannot ignore that the number of electric cars will continue to increase exponentially and, more importantly, the penetration of many of the EV battery materials (such as silicon anodes or electrolytes) is also increasing strongly, benefiting related companies through both effects. While EV materials penetration numbers will increase in the coming years, figures are being overestimated by many analysts, in our view.

We maintain positive views on Indonesia, Mexico, Poland, Chile and China, always as a result of our bottom-up approach. Nevertheless, we are constantly looking for alternatives in other geographies and our portfolio remains well diversified among countries, industries and currencies.

Blocs montrant la transition de l’année 2022 à 2023

Les turbulences du marché au cours des dernières années ont culminé avec un important repli des actions cotées et des titres à revenu fixe en 2022. Cependant, le chemin parcouru a permis de tirer des enseignements et des leçons utiles, notamment des expériences vécues au plus fort de la pandémie en 2020. Cet article examine dans quelle mesure les investisseurs ont tenu compte des signaux d’alarme ou s’ils ont été désensibilisés aux risques qui en découlaient.

David Hillson, consultant international en gestion du risque, définit le risque comme des « incertitudes importantes ». Autrement dit, lorsqu’on examine les diverses incertitudes liées aux placements, l’essentiel est de comprendre à quel point les conséquences pourraient être importantes si les choses ne se déroulent pas comme prévu. L’évaluation et l’acceptation du risque varient d’un investisseur à l’autre. Cela s’explique par le fait que différents investisseurs ont différents niveaux d’appétit pour le risque et de tolérance au risque.

Selon la définition d’Hillson, les conséquences pratiques pour les investisseurs consistent à hiérarchiser les risques au moment de décider comment y réagir. Par exemple, si un risque donné a une faible incidence et une faible probabilité, vous pouvez choisir de l’accepter. Toutefois, pour les risques importants et dont la probabilité est plus élevée, vous voudrez agir. Cela peut comprendre le contrôle de l’exposition au risque au moyen d’une meilleure diversification du portefeuille ou l’élimination complète du risque, si possible.

Enseignements tirés de la pandémie

Dans le contexte récent des marchés, la pandémie a fait ressortir des enseignements et des signaux d’alarme, dont les suivants :

  • Une concentration accrue des marchés boursiers, en particulier des sociétés technologiques;
  • Un risque accru de hausse des taux d’intérêt et un potentiel de rendements négatifs des titres à revenu fixe;
  • Des gouvernements du monde entier travaillant ensemble pour gérer des enjeux mondiaux importants.

Concentration des marchés boursiers

Il n’y a eu aucune surprise lorsque les marchés boursiers ont reculé en réaction à la propagation de la pandémie au premier trimestre de 2020, car les investisseurs ont réagi aux répercussions sur l’économie et au sort de certaines sociétés, en particulier celles du secteur des voyages et du tourisme, alors que le monde amorçait diverses étapes du confinement. Toutefois, la rapidité de la reprise a surpris la plupart des investisseurs.

Soutenus par des mesures d’assouplissement quantitatif exhaustives, les marchés boursiers se sont fortement redressés et plusieurs ont enregistré des rendements positifs importants pour l’année civile 2020. Parmi les actions les plus performantes à l’échelle mondiale en 2020, mentionnons celles des sociétés technologiques, qui ont profité de la dépendance accrue au commerce électronique durant la pandémie. Toutefois, cette solide performance a également entraîné une concentration accrue des principaux indices boursiers. Par exemple, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook et Alphabet Inc. ont représenté plus de 20 % de l’indice S&P 500 à la fin de 2020. Ce rendement impressionnant a également désensibilisé les investisseurs au risque de concentration.

Les actions américaines sont généralement la composante la plus importante des portefeuilles de la plupart des investisseurs, de sorte que la concentration accrue a suggéré qu’une révision de la construction globale du portefeuille d’actions était appropriée. Pour ceux qui privilégient les marchés boursiers développés mondiaux à grande capitalisation, où les États-Unis dominent la capitalisation boursière globale, les considérations potentielles comprennent l’ajout de placements dans les actions mondiales à petite capitalisation et les actions des marchés émergents.

Toutefois, la diversification de la répartition globale des actions pour réduire le risque propre aux actions américaines n’a pas réglé le problème de la préférence pour les technologies de l’information, car les titres technologiques à l’échelle mondiale ont grandement profité de la dépendance au commerce électronique durant la pandémie. Par conséquent, une évaluation de la préférence générale pour le style de gestion des actions était également de mise. Par exemple, les gestionnaires axés sur la valeur sont moins enclins à investir dans des titres technologiques, ce qui offre une source de diversification sectorielle.

La réduction de toute préférence pour les titres technologiques et de croissance en général aurait été un avantage en 2022, puisque ceux-ci ont été les plus touchés au cours de l’année civile. Les hauts et les bas de certains titres et secteurs soulignent l’importance de disposer d’un processus formel d’évaluation du risque pour discuter des incertitudes qui se présentent et les traiter, comme le risque de concentration.

Risque lié à la hausse des taux d’intérêt

Les taux des titres à revenu fixe sont en baisse depuis des décennies, période au cours de laquelle les gouvernements et les sociétés ont profité de l’occasion pour prolonger considérablement l’échéance de leurs obligations lorsqu’ils effectuaient de nouvelles émissions. Ce faisant, ils ont contribué à une sensibilité accrue aux variations des taux d’intérêt (durée) pour les indices de titres à revenu fixe, comme l’indice des obligations universelles FTSE Canada, et au risque associé de faibles taux de rendement combiné à une durée élevée dans un contexte de hausse des taux. Pendant des années, les « experts » ont prédit une hausse des taux d’intérêt qui n’a pas eu lieu, ce qui a incité les investisseurs à baisser la garde à l’égard du risque qui en a découlé.

De plus, l’expérience du marché des titres à revenu fixe durant la pandémie a simplement alimenté la désensibilisation des investisseurs. En période de tensions sur les marchés boursiers, un portefeuille de titres à revenu fixe de qualité assorti d’une durée élevée peut constituer une importante source de diversification en raison de la demande accrue d’actifs « refuges » et de la baisse des taux. Ceci a d’ailleurs permis aux marchés des titres à revenu fixe de dégager des rendements positifs lorsque les marchés boursiers subissaient d’importants replis. La nature défensive des titres à revenu fixe s’est concrétisée en 2020, car l’indice des obligations universelles FTSE Canada a inscrit un rendement de 8,7 % pour l’année, malgré le faible taux de rendement en vigueur.

Toutefois, le risque associé à la faiblesse des taux et à une durée élevée dans un contexte de hausse des taux d’intérêt s’est manifesté avec force en 2022, car l’indice obligataire universel FTSE Canada a reculé de plus de 11 % et l’indice obligataire global à long terme FTSE Canada, de plus de 21 % pour l’année civile.

Les mesures prises par les investisseurs qui ont un objectif de rendement absolu et qui ont tenu compte des signaux d’alarme relatifs aux faibles rendements et à la durée élevée comprennent les suivantes :

  • Adopter des stratégies de titres à revenu fixe axées sur la préservation du capital et moins sensibles aux taux d’intérêt;
  • Assouplir les contraintes imposées aux gestionnaires de titres à revenu fixe dans le but de générer une plus grande valeur ajoutée par rapport à celle des stratégies de titres à revenu fixe traditionnelles;
  • Augmenter le taux de rendement au moyen d’autres actifs à revenu fixe, comme les prêts hypothécaires commerciaux;
  • Investir dans des actifs à revenu non fixe à rendement plus élevé, comme les infrastructures directes et les biens immobiliers commerciaux.

La situation est différente pour les investisseurs qui ont des objectifs liés au passif, comme les régimes de retraite à prestations déterminées, où, dans de nombreux cas, malgré les rendements négatifs des actifs des régimes de retraite en 2022, la diminution du passif a été plus importante, ce qui a amélioré la capitalisation. Or, pour les régimes qui ont recours à l’effet de levier dans leur portefeuille de titres à revenu fixe pour accroître la couverture du passif, l’expérience du marché en 2022 peut avoir détérioré la capitalisation.

En raison de la dynamique de l’actif et du passif des régimes de retraite à prestations déterminées, les prochaines évaluations du risque et les discussions connexes porteront probablement sur la question de savoir si l’expérience de 2022 a créé une occasion de tirer parti d’une amélioration de la capitalisation. Par exemple, lorsque l’objectif est de gérer la volatilité associée à la capitalisation, l’augmentation de la pondération des titres à revenu fixe pourrait constituer un facteur de gestion du risque.

Des gouvernements qui travaillent ensemble

La pandémie a montré que les gouvernements du monde entier peuvent travailler ensemble pour s’attaquer à d’importants enjeux mondiaux et a créé des attentes à l’égard d’une meilleure coordination de l’investissement responsable en général, et plus particulièrement du risque climatique.

La guerre actuelle en Ukraine et son incidence sur l’offre et les prix de l’énergie ont fait en sorte que les marchés fortement axés sur les ressources, comme le Canada, ont profité de la hausse de la pondération du secteur de l’énergie, ce qui a contribué à limiter l’ampleur des replis des marchés en 2022 par rapport aux marchés moins exposés aux ressources. La situation a également mis en évidence les défis que représente l’adoption d’une position sans placement dans les combustibles fossiles au sein d’un portefeuille au cours d’une période où l’énergie était le secteur boursier le plus performant.

Néanmoins, il est essentiel que les gouvernements et les propriétaires d’actifs ne soient pas insensibles à l’importance et à l’urgence d’une transition vers des énergies renouvelables et plus propres, simplement en raison de la récente expérience de rendement des placements. Même si le monde reste fortement tributaire des sources d’énergie traditionnelles et qu’il y a encore beaucoup de chemin à faire pour réduire notre empreinte carbone, une transition continue et ordonnée vers des énergies plus propres est essentielle pour gérer l’impact du risque climatique.

Perspectives

Les turbulences des dernières années ont contribué à désensibiliser les investisseurs aux risques qui en découlent. La gestion du risque ne doit pas seulement reposer sur une modélisation complexe; elle peut prendre différentes formes, y compris une discussion simple entre les fiduciaires ou les membres du comité, en s’appuyant sur les points de vue des gestionnaires de placement et des consultants, et en peaufinant la stratégie d’actif et la diversification du portefeuille. Au début de 2023, prenez le temps d’examiner soigneusement votre portefeuille afin de déterminer toute incertitude susceptible d’accroître le risque de ne pas atteindre vos objectifs.

US broad money growth has normalised even as the numbers remain inflated by the tail end of the Fed’s QE programme.

The broad money measure calculated here – “M2+”, which adds large time deposits at commercial banks and money fund balances to the official M2 measure – rose at an annualised rate of 5.4% in the three months to February, only slightly higher than a 4.5% average over 2015-19, when the Fed’s core inflation measure was mostly below the 2% target.

Chart 1

Chart 1 showing US Broad Money Measures (% 3m annualised)

The Fed’s securities holdings rose by the equivalent of 3.8 pp of M2+ expressed at an annualised rate in the three months to February.

Current Fed signals suggest a mid-year start to QT. Broad money momentum could fall to a weak level in H2 unless bank lending grows strongly.

Commercial bank loan expansion was rapid in late 2021, partly reflecting high stockbuilding, but cooled in January / February, while demand for home loans could plunge in response to the recent surge in mortgage rates.

The monetary slowdown, as usual, will feed through to inflation with a “long and variable” lag but a reasonable expectation – assuming that current (or lower) growth is sustained – is that core price momentum would return to target during H2 2023.

The slowdown supports the message from the Wu-Xia shadow fed funds rate that there has already been a significant effective policy tightening via the withdrawal of “unconventional” support measures (QE, forward guidance, etc). The shadow rate uses information from the term structure of interest rates to quantify the impact of such measures when the policy rate is at the lower bound. The suggestion is that last week’s quarter-point hike was the ninth not first such move in the Fed’s tightening sequence – chart 2. (This casts doubt on market prognoses based on examining behaviour after previous first Fed hikes.)

Chart 2

Chart 2 showing US Fed Funds Target Rate & Wu-Xia Shadow Rate

The current conjuncture has some similarity to early 2016. The shadow rate had risen significantly during 2015 as the Fed wound down QE before its first hike in December. Subsequent US / global economic weakness caused policy-makers to defer the next hike for 12 months (i.e. until December 2016).

There are two key differences. The obvious one is inflation – core was below target during 2015-16, giving the Fed scope to execute a “dovish pivot” as economic news and markets weakened. In addition, the global stockbuilding cycle was nearing a low when the Fed hiked in December 2015. The current assessment here is that it is beginning a downswing, with a trough unlikely to be reached until 2023. Central banks lag the cycle and typically remain hawkish until well into the downswing (thereby magnifying the cycle).

Both considerations suggest a more sustained Fed tightening campaign – albeit increasingly questionable from a “monetarist” perspective – with a correspondingly much higher risk of a recessionary outcome than in 2016.