Image of office skyscrapers with reflections in the sunlight

Fonds Connor, Clark & Lunn Inc. (Fonds CC&L) est heureuse d’annoncer deux portefeuilles axés sur le rendement absolu sous forme de fonds alternatifs liquides, soit le Fonds mondial neutre au marché CC&L II et le Fonds d’actions mondiales longues/courtes CC&L (les Fonds).

Le Fonds mondial neutre au marché CC&L II cherche à obtenir un rendement positif et intéressant à long terme après correction du risque, présentant une faible corrélation avec les marchés boursiers traditionnels, et moins volatil que ces derniers. Cote de risque : Faible à moyenne.

Le Fonds d’actions mondiales longues/courtes CC&L vise à procurer une plus-value du capital à long terme et des rendements corrigés du risque intéressants en investissant activement dans un portefeuille de titres à court et à long terme. Cote de risque : Moyenne.

Pour gérer les Fonds, Fonds CC&L a retenu les services de Gestion de placements Connor, Clark & Lunn Ltée (Gestion de placements CC&L), établie à Vancouver; cette entité est l’une des plus importantes sociétés de gestion de placements privées au Canada, avec près de 20 ans d’expérience dans la gestion de stratégies de placement non traditionnelles pour les investisseurs institutionnels.

« Nos clients nous ont dit qu’ils veulent avoir accès à des placements non traditionnels de calibre institutionnel, gérés par une équipe qui a un historique de bons résultats, dans le but d’obtenir un fonds alternatif liquide. En lançant ces deux nouveaux portefeuilles, nous atteignons ces objectifs et offrons aux conseillers en placement et à leurs clients deux profils de risque et de rendement intéressants parmi lesquels choisir », a déclaré Tim Elliott, président et chef de la direction de Fonds CC&L.

« Nous sommes ravis que ces solutions de placement non traditionnelles soient offertes à un plus grand nombre d’investisseurs canadiens. Comme nous sommes passés à un contexte caractérisé par des taux d’intérêt et une inflation structurellement plus élevés, nous nous attendons à ce que les cycles de marché soient plus courts, que la volatilité soit plus élevée et que les rendements des actifs risqués conventionnels soient plus faibles. Dans un tel contexte, nous croyons qu’il deviendra plus important pour les investisseurs d’intégrer des sources de rendement indépendantes des marchés boursiers et obligataires afin d’améliorer les résultats du portefeuille », a déclaré Martin Gerber, président et chef des placements à Gestion de placements CC&L.

Fonds CC&L et Gestion de placements CC&L sont des sociétés affiliées du Groupe financier Connor, Clark and Lunn (CC&L), dont la structure à multiples sociétés affiliées réunit les talents d’équipes de placement diversifiées qui offrent une vaste gamme de solutions de placement traditionnelles et non traditionnelles. CC&L est l’un des plus importants gestionnaires de placements indépendants au Canada; il gère plus de 104 milliards de dollars d’actifs pour le compte d’investisseurs institutionnels et particuliers.

À propos des fonds

Offerts en parts de série A et de série F, les fonds sont conformes au cadre réglementaire des fonds communs de placement non traditionnels offerts par prospectus simplifiés. Les parts des fonds sont vendues par l’intermédiaire de courtiers en placement titulaires d’un permis; leur prix est évalué quotidiennement et elles pourront être rachetées quotidiennement. Le fonds est offert au moyen de FundServ.

À propos de Fonds Connor, Clark & Lunn Inc.

Fonds Connor, Clark & Lunn Inc. (les Fonds CC&L) noue des partenariats avec des institutions financières canadiennes de premier plan et leurs conseillers en placement afin d’offrir des stratégies de placements institutionnelles uniques à des investisseurs particuliers, grâce à une gamme de fonds, de placements alternatifs liquides et de comptes en gestion distincte choisis avec soin.

En limitant sa gamme à un groupe de solutions de placement en particulier, Fonds CC&L est en mesure d’offrir des stratégies uniques conçues pour améliorer les portefeuilles traditionnels des investisseurs. Pour obtenir des précisions, consultez le site cclfundsinc.com.

À propos de Gestion de placements Connor, Clark & Lunn Ltée

Gestion de placements Connor, Clark & Lunn Ltée (Gestion de placements CC&L) est l’une des plus importantes sociétés de gestion de placements indépendantes au Canada (elle appartient à ses associés) et gère un actif de 54,2 milliards de dollars. Fondée en 1982, elle propose une gamme diversifiée de solutions de placements traditionnels (actions, titres à revenu fixe et placements équilibrés) et non traditionnels (stratégies neutres au marché, à alpha portable et à rendement absolu).

CC&L fait partie du Groupe financier Connor, Clark & Lunn (Groupe financier CC&L), une société de gestion d’actifs dotée d’une structure multientreprise, dont les sociétés affiliées gèrent collectivement un actif financier de plus de 104 milliards de dollars. Pour de plus amples renseignements, consultez le site cclinvest.com.

À propos du Groupe financier Connor, Clark & Lunn Ltée.

Le Groupe financier Connor, Clark & Lunn Ltée (Groupe financier CC&L) est une société de gestion d’actifs indépendante à multiples sociétés affiliées qui offre une vaste gamme de solutions de gestion de placements traditionnelles et non traditionnelles aux investisseurs institutionnels et individuels. Le Groupe financier CC&L procure une envergure et une expertise considérables qui permettent d’assumer des fonctions administratives qui ne sont pas liées aux placements tout en laissant les gestionnaires de placement se concentrer sur ce qu’ils font le mieux grâce à la centralisation des activités liées aux opérations et à la distribution. Les sociétés affiliées du Groupe financier CC&L gèrent un actif de plus de 104 milliards de dollars. Pour obtenir des précisions, consultez le site cclgroup.com.

Personne-ressource

Lisa Wilson
Directrice, Produits et service à la clientèle
Fonds Connor, Clark & Lunn Inc.
416 864-3120
[email protected]

Downtown skyline of Toronto Canada at twilight.

Fonds Connor, Clark & Lunn inc., le gestionnaire du Fonds de rendement absolu II PCJ (le « Fonds ») est heureux d’annoncer un changement aux modalités de liquidité du Fonds.

À partir de maintenant, les ordres d’achat, de vente et de substitution du Fonds ne seront plus hebdomadaires à 16 h, heure de l’Est, le vendredi, mais quotidiens à 15 h, heure de l’Est, chaque jour ouvrable ou avant la fermeture de la Bourse de Toronto (TSX) pour la journée, selon la première éventualité, et tous les ordres seront traités en fonction de la valeur liquidative calculée ce jour-là. Les ordres reçus après 15 h, heure de l’Est, seront traités le jour ouvrable suivant en fonction de la valeur liquidative de ce jour-là.

À propos de Fonds Connor, Clark & Lunn Inc.

Fonds Connor, Clark & Lunn Inc. (les Fonds CC&L) noue des partenariats avec des institutions financières canadiennes de premier plan et leurs conseillers en placement afin d’offrir des stratégies de placements institutionnelles uniques à des investisseurs particuliers, grâce à une gamme de fonds, de placements alternatifs liquides et de comptes en gestion distincte choisis avec soin. En limitant sa gamme à un groupe de solutions de placement en particulier, Fonds CC&L est en mesure d’offrir des stratégies uniques conçues pour améliorer les portefeuilles traditionnels des investisseurs. Pour obtenir des précisions, consultez le site cclfundsinc.com.

Forward-Looking Information

This news release may contain forward-looking information (within the meaning of applicable securities laws) relating to the business and operations of the Manager and the Fund (« forward-looking statements »). Forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as « believe », « anticipate », « project », « expect », « intend », « plan », « will », « may », « estimate » and other similar expressions. The forward-looking statements in this news release are based on certain assumptions; they are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to control or predict. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the factors discussed under the heading « What is a Mutual Fund and What Are the Risks of Investing in a Mutual Fund? » in the simplified prospectus available on the SEDAR profile of the Fund at www.sedar.com. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate as actual outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Readers, therefore, should not place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. Further, these forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this news release and, except as expressly required by applicable law, the Manager and the Fund assume no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Personne-ressource

Lisa Wilson
Directrice, Produits et service à la clientèle
Fonds Connor, Clark & Lunn Inc.
416-864-3120
[email protected]

Immeubles de bureaux lumineux à Canary Wharf, Londres la nuit.

Fonds Connor, Clark & Lunn inc. (Fonds CC&L) est heureux d’annoncer le récent lancement d’une version admissible au prospectus du portefeuille concentré d’actions internationales NS Partners, qui est maintenant offert aux investisseurs canadiens. Le Fonds concentré d’actions internationales NS Partners est fondé sur un portefeuille semblable, auparavant offert uniquement aux investisseurs institutionnels et internes.

Le Fonds cherche à procurer aux investisseurs une plus-value du capital à long terme en investissant dans un portefeuille composé principalement d’actions autres que nord-américaines, dont jusqu’à 20 % dans les marchés émergents.

Pour gérer le fonds, Fonds CC&L a retenu les services de NS Partners Ltd (NS Partners), un gestionnaire établi à Londres, au Royaume-Uni, qui compte plus de 30 ans d’expérience dans la gestion de portefeuilles d’actions internationales, y compris des marchés développés et émergents. NS Partners combine un cadre ascendant de qualité et de croissance pour examiner les sociétés au moyen d’une analyse descendante unique de la liquidité à l’échelle mondiale afin de repérer les régions, les pays et les secteurs qui devraient enregistrer des rendements supérieurs ou inférieurs, ainsi que pour déterminer s’il y a lieu de positionner le portefeuille en fonction d’un appétit ou d’une aversion pour le risque.

« Pour les investisseurs dans des portefeuilles d’actions mondiales à grande capitalisation, il existe des arguments convaincants en faveur d’une pondération distincte des actions internationales, compte tenu des problèmes de valorisation et de concentration sur le marché des actions américaines à grande capitalisation et des difficultés liées à la vigueur du dollar américain. En présentant notre portefeuille concentré d’actions internationales de NS Partners sous forme de fonds, nous pouvons offrir une solution attrayante aux investisseurs individuels, gérée par une équipe de placement de calibre institutionnel qui a fait ses preuves et qui adopte une approche différenciée », a déclaré Tim Elliott, président et chef de la direction de Fonds CC&L.

« Nous sommes ravis que notre portefeuille concentré d’actions internationales soit accessible à un plus grand nombre d’investisseurs canadiens. Grâce à notre processus éprouvé, à notre solide feuille de route en matière de placements institutionnels et à notre équipe de placement talentueuse et dévouée, nous croyons que ce portefeuille offrira une solution intéressante aux personnes qui cherchent une croissance à long terme sur les marchés boursiers internationaux. » a déclaré Tim Bray, président et chef des placements de NS Partners.

Fonds CC&L et NS Partners sont des sociétés affiliées du Groupe financier Connor, Clark and Lunn (« CC&L »), dont la structure à multiples sociétés affiliées réunit les talents d’équipes de placement diversifiées qui offrent une vaste gamme de solutions de placement traditionnelles et non traditionnelles. CC&L est l’un des plus importants gestionnaires de placements indépendants au Canada; il gère plus de 104 milliards de dollars d’actifs pour le compte d’investisseurs institutionnels et particuliers.

À propos du fonds

Offert en parts de série A et de série F, le fonds est conforme au cadre réglementaire des fonds communs de placement conventionnels offerts par prospectus simplifié. Les parts du fonds seront vendues par l’intermédiaire de courtiers en placement titulaires d’un permis; leur prix est évalué quotidiennement et elles pourront être rachetées quotidiennement. Le fonds est offert au moyen de FundServ.

À propos de Fonds Connor, Clark & Lunn Inc.

Fonds Connor, Clark & Lunn Inc. (les Fonds CC&L) noue des partenariats avec des institutions financières canadiennes de premier plan et leurs conseillers en placement afin d’offrir des stratégies de placements institutionnelles uniques à des investisseurs particuliers, grâce à une gamme de fonds, de placements alternatifs liquides et de comptes en gestion distincte choisis avec soin.

En limitant sa gamme à un groupe de solutions de placement en particulier, Fonds CC&L est en mesure d’offrir des stratégies uniques conçues pour améliorer les portefeuilles traditionnels des investisseurs. Pour de plus amples renseignements, consultez le site www.cclfundsinc.com.

À propos de NS Partners Ltd

NS Partners Ltd est une société de gestion de placements indépendante qui se spécialise dans la gestion active de portefeuilles d’actions mondiales pour le compte de grandes entreprises, de caisses de retraite, de fondations, de fonds de dotation et de fonds souverains. NS Partners Ltd est membre du Groupe financier Connor, Clark & Lunn, une société de gestion de placements dotée d’une structure multientreprise. Pour obtenir de plus amples renseignements, consultez le site www.ns-partners.co.uk.

À propos du Groupe financier Connor, Clark & Lunn Ltée.

Le Groupe financier Connor, Clark & Lunn Ltée (Groupe financier CC&L) est une société de gestion d’actifs indépendante à multiples sociétés affiliées qui offre une vaste gamme de solutions de gestion de placements traditionnelles et non traditionnelles aux investisseurs institutionnels et individuels. Le Groupe financier CC&L procure une envergure et une expertise considérables qui permettent d’assumer des fonctions administratives qui ne sont pas liées aux placements tout en laissant les gestionnaires de placement se concentrer sur ce qu’ils font le mieux grâce à la centralisation des activités liées aux opérations et à la distribution. Les sociétés affiliées du Groupe financier CC&L gèrent un actif de plus de 104 milliards de dollars. Pour obtenir de plus amples renseignements, consultez le site www.cclgroup.com.

Personne-ressource

Lisa Wilson
Directrice, Produits et service à la clientèle
Fonds Connor, Clark & Lunn Inc.
416-864-3120
[email protected]

The two measures of global “excess” money tracked here remain negative, arguing for a cautious view of equity market prospects. 

Excess (or deficient) money refers to the difference between the actual money stock and the demand for money to support economic transactions. According to “monetarist” theory, a surplus is associated with increased demand for financial / real assets and upward pressure on their prices, assuming no change in supply. 

Excess money is unobservable so two proxies are followed here: the difference between six-month rates of change of global (i.e. G7 plus E7) real narrow money and industrial output; and the deviation of 12-month real narrow money growth from a slow moving average. 

Historically (i.e. over 1970-2021), global equities outperformed US dollar cash on average only when both measures were positive. Unsurprisingly, average performance was worst when both were negative (underperformance of 8.9% pa). These results allow for reporting lags in monetary / economic data. 

The second measure turned negative in October 2021, which was known by end-November. The first measure followed in November, which was known by end-January 2022 (a longer lag because industrial output numbers are released after monetary / CPI data). 

Previous posts noted a recovery in global six-month real narrow money momentum during H2 2022*. With industrial output expected to weaken, it was suggested that the first measure would turn positive, possibly by December. 

The second measure – based on 12- rather than six-month real money momentum – was deeply negative in late 2022, with a switch to positive deemed unlikely before mid-2023. 

The suggested switch positive in the first measure has yet to occur. The six-month rate of change of industrial output crossed below zero in December but remained just above real narrow money momentum – see chart 1. 

Chart 1

Chart 1 showing G7 + E7 Industrial Output & Real Narrow Money (% 6m) highlighting August 2022

Will a cross-over have occurred in January? Partial data suggest that the recovery in real money momentum stalled last month. A reliable January estimate of industrial output won’t be available until mid-March. A reopening bounce in China could offset weakness elsewhere. 

A further point is that the recovery in global real narrow money momentum since mid-2022 partly reflected a strong pick-up in Russia, which may be of limited global relevance given the country’s enforced economic and financial isolation. 

Chart 2 shows the result of replacing Russia with Indonesia in the G7 plus E7 real money calculation from January 2022, before the February invasion of Ukraine**. The trough in real money momentum is placed in October rather than August, with the subsequent recovery even more anaemic. 

Chart 2

Chart 2 showing G7 + E7 Industrial Output & Real Narrow Money (% 6m) highlighting October 2022

*The trough in real money momentum originally occurred in June but is now placed in August, partly reflecting revisions to US CPI seasonal adjustments.

**The other E7 countries (as defined here) are Brazil, China, India, Korea, Mexico and Taiwan.

Gas price relief and Chinese reopening have tempered pessimism about Eurozone economic prospects, contributing to a Q4 rally in equities. Monetary trends, by contrast, suggest a worsening outlook due to the ECB’s scorched earth policy tightening. 

The preferred narrow money measure here – non-financial M1 – contracted for a third straight month in November. The three-month annualised rate of decline of 5.3% compares with a maximum fall of 1.7% during the GFC – see chart 1. 

Chart 1

Chart showing Eurozone Money Measures

Narrow money weakness is being driven by households and firms switching out of overnight deposits into time deposits and notice accounts – a normal pre-recessionary development. Broad money, in addition, is slowing – non-financial M3 rose by only 0.2% in November, pulling three-month annualised growth down to 3.4%, the slowest since 2018. 

The headline M1 and M3 measures are displaying greater weakness, reflecting a fall in money holdings of non-bank financial corporations.

Broad money growth had been supported by solid expansion of bank loans to the private sector but, as expected and signalled by the ECB’s lending survey, momentum is now fading – chart 2. Slumping credit demand and forthcoming QT suggest that broad money will follow narrow into contraction. 

Chart 2

Chart showing Eurozone Bank Loans to Private Sector and ECB Bank Lending Survey Credit Demand Indicator

Corporate loan demand had been boosted by inventory financing but stockbuilding reached a record share of GDP in Q3 – chart 3 – and is probably now being cut back sharply, contributing to a move into recession. Consistent with this story, short-term loans to corporations contracted in both October and November. 

Chart 3

Chart showing Eurozone Stockbuilding as Percent of GDP

A sharp fall in inflation will support real money trends but has yet to arrive. The six-month rate of contraction of real non-financial M1 reached another new record in November – chart 4. 

Chart 4

Eurozone GDP and Real Narrow Money

Monetary tightening in 2007-08 and 2010-11 was associated with a divergence of money trends across countries, reflecting and contributing to financial fragmentation. This is occurring again, with weakness focused on Italy. 

Italian real narrow money deposits contracted by 9.7%, or an annualised 18.4%, in the six months to November, with the larger decline than elsewhere due to both greater nominal weakness and higher CPI inflation – chart 5.

Chart 5

Chart showing Real Narrow Money

In nominal terms, total bank deposits in Italy were unchanged in the year to November – chart 6. Italian banks’ assets grew modestly over this period. The banks funded this expansion by increasing their net borrowing from Banca d’Italia, which in turn accessed additional funding from the Eurosystem, resulting in a further widening of its TARGET2 deficit. The deficit reached a record €715 billion in September following a surge in Italian BTP yields, falling back in October / November – chart 7. Another rise in yields since early December may have been associated with deposit outflows from the banking system and renewed upward pressure on the TARGET2 shortfall. 

Chart 6

Chart showing Bank Deposits of Eurozone Residents

Chart 7

Chart showing TARGET2 Balances

The “monetarist” rule of thumb that broad money growth leads inflation by two years suggests a rapid fall in G7 CPI inflation in 2023 and an undershoot of targets by H2 2024.

Annual growth of the G7 broad money measure calculated here is likely to have fallen below 3% in October, based on US and Japanese data. The money stock appears to have stagnated in the latest three months, with a contraction in the US offsetting weak growth elsewhere*.

The monetarist rule worked perfectly in the early 1970s, when a surge in annual money growth to a peak in November 1972 was followed by a spike in annual CPI inflation to a high exactly two years later – see chart 1.

Chart 1

Chart 1 showing G7 Consumer Prices and Broad Money (% yoy)

Inflation fell sharply from its 1974 peak, mirroring a big decline in money growth in 1973-74. The difference from now is that annual money growth bottomed above 10%, resulting in inflation stalling at a still-high level.

The money growth surge in 2020-21 was almost complete by June 2020 but a final peak was delayed until February 2021. Consistent with the two-year rule, CPI inflation spiked into June 2022, since moving sideways. It may or may not make a final peak but the rule suggests that a major decline will be delayed until after February 2023.

Broad money growth averaged 4.5% in the five years to end-2019. CPI inflation averaged 1.9% in the five years to end-2021 (i.e. allowing for the two-year lag). Money growth returned to the 2015-19 average in June 2022 (4.4%). The monetarist rule, therefore, suggests that inflation will be back below 2% by mid-2024 and will continue to move lower later in the year, reflecting the further decline in money growth since June.

How fast will inflation fall? A reasonable assumption is that its decline will mirror the rapid drop in money growth two years earlier, consistent with the 1970s experience. An illustrative projection is shown in chart 2. Inflation, currently at 7.8% (October estimate), falls to 4% in July 2023 and below 3% by December.

Chart 2

Chart 2 showing G7 Consumer Prices & Broad Money (% yoy) with “Monetarist” Forecast

Some monetarist economists expect inflation to be stickier in 2023. They argue that there is still a monetary “overhang” from the growth surge in 2020-21. Inflation, according to this view, will remain high into H2 2023 to “absorb” this excess. The impact of current monetary weakness will be delayed until 2024-25.

The assessment here is that the overhang is much reduced and its removal is consistent with the optimistic inflation projection shown in chart 2 as long as money trends remain as weak as currently, which is likely.

One measure of the monetary overhang is the deviation of the real broad money stock from its 2010-19 trend. This deviation peaked at 16% in May 2021 and has since narrowed to 6% as inflation has overtaken slowing nominal money growth – chart 3. 

Chart 3

Chart 3 showing G7 Real Broad Money where January 1964 = 100

The projection in chart 3 is based on the inflation profile in chart 2 and an assumption that broad money grows by 2% pa. The deviation of the real money stock from trend falls below 2% in H2 2023 and is eliminated by mid-2024.

Is the assumption of 2% money growth realistic? As noted, there has been no expansion in the latest three months.

As the chart shows, there was a larger deviation of real money from trend than currently at the end of the GFC in 2009. The adjustment back to trend was driven by nominal money weakness rather than high inflation – the money stock contracted by 1.9% between July 2009 and June 2010.

Bank lending has been supporting money growth but central bank loan officer surveys suggest a sharp slowdown ahead: October Fed survey results released this week echo weakness in earlier ECB and BoE surveys – chart 4.

Chart 4

Chart 4 showing US Commercial Bank Loans and Leases (% 6m) with Fed Senior Loan Officer Survey Credit Demand and Supply Indicators* *Weighted Average of Balances across Loan Categories

Continued monetary stagnation – or worse – would confirm that G7 central banks, with the honourable exception of the BoJ, have overtightened policies, compounding their 2020-21 policy error.

G7 monetary gyrations may be contrasted with relative stability around trend in E7** real broad money – chart 5. E7 central bank eased policies conventionally in 2020 and were quick to reverse course as economies rebounded and / or inflationary pressures emerged. This has been reflected in lower average inflation than in the G7 and a faster turnaround – chart 6.

Chart 5

Chart 5 showing E7 Real Broad Money where June 1995 = 100

Chart 6

Chart 6 showing G7 and E7 Consumer Prices (% 6m)

*Money measures used: US M2+ (M2 plus large time deposits and institutional money funds), Japan M3, Eurozone non-financial M3, UK non-financial M4, Canada expanded M2+ (M2+ plus non-personal time deposits).

**E7 defined here as BRIC plus Korea, Mexico and Taiwan.

Photo de Michael Mortimore

Michael Mortimore, gestionnaire de portefeuille client de NSP, a expliqué à WealthBriefing comment l’analyse des cycles de liquidité peut contribuer à la discipline dans la sélection des actions et la répartition des actifs.

M. Mortimore s’est joint à NS Partners en février 2022; auparavant, il a travaillé à Somerset Capital et à Macquarie Bank.

Dans cet article, il explique comment les flux de liquidités provenant des banques centrales peuvent guider les décisions de placement dans ces économies. Il illustre ce thème à l’aide d’exemples venant des marchés émergents, comme l’Asie du Sud-Est. M. Mortimore a indiqué que « notre exposition à la région reposait en partie sur la probabilité que les prix du pétrole demeurent élevés pendant encore un certain temps, ainsi que sur les prix élevés des matières premières et les données monétaires favorables. Ces marchés ont connu une excellente année et ont récemment été une source de liquidités pour nous. »

L’article a été publié le 11 août 2022 dans WealthBriefing et WealthBriefingAsia.

Lisez l’article complet (en anglais).

There are three messages from Eurozone monetary data for May released yesterday.

  1. The region faces a major recession that is likely to extend into early 2023, at least.
  2. Economic prospects are at least as bad for core countries as for the periphery.
  3. Nominal monetary trends are consistent with inflation returning to – or falling below – the 2% target in 2023-24, arguing for an immediate suspension of ECB tightening plans.

The “best” monetary leading indicator of Eurozone GDP, according to ECB research, is real non-financial M1, i.e. holdings of currency and overnight deposits by households and non-financial corporations deflated by consumer prices.

The six-month rate of change of real non-financial M1 turned negative in January and fell further to -1.9% (not annualised) in May, below the lows reached before / during the 2008-09 and 2011-12 recessions – see chart 1.

Chart 1

Chart 1 showing Eurozone GDP & Real Narrow Money* (% 6m) *Non-Financial M1 from 2003, M1 before

Based on longer-run data for real M1, the current rate of real narrow money contraction is the fastest since 1981.

All previous recessions ended only after the six-month rate of change turned positive. The ECB research, meanwhile, found that real narrow money led GDP by three to four quarters on average. The suggestion is that an incipient recession will extend into Q1 2023, at least.

Chart 2 shows six-month rate of changes of real non-financial M1 deposits in the big four economies. (A country breakdown of currency holdings is unavailable.) In a reversal of the pattern before the 2011-12 recession, weakness is more pronounced in Germany and now France than in Spain and Italy. German divergence partly reflects higher inflation but nominal growth of deposits is also weaker in France / Germany than Spain / Italy.

Chart 2

Chart 2 showing Real Narrow Money* (% 6m) *Excluding Currency in Circulation, i.e. Overnight Deposits Only

Eurozone nominal money trends, meanwhile, indicate rapidly improving medium-term inflation prospects. Annual growth of broad money, as measured by non-financial M3, slowed to 4.8% in May, with three-month momentum down to 2.8% annualised, the lowest since 2018 – chart 3.

Chart 3

Chart 3 showing Eurozone Narrow / Broad Money

The slowdown has occurred despite a rise in annual growth in bank loan to a post-GFC high of 5.3% in May. This pick-up does not contradict the negative monetary signal – lending is a coincident or lagging indicator of GDP (confirmed by the ECB research). The coincident / lagging relationship partly reflects a correlation of corporate credit growth with the stockbuilding cycle – demand for short-term loans is strongest as inventories swell at the peak of the cycle. Consistent with this explanation, loans to corporations with a maturity of up to a year grew by an annual 7.0% in May.

The counterparts analysis of M3 shows that the slowdown has been driven by the ending of QE but also a significant balance of payments outflow, reflected in a fall in banks’ net external assets. This outflow is the mirror-image of a basic balance deficit, which has widened as a current account surplus has been wiped out by high energy prices while the Ukraine crisis and other factors have triggered an exodus of capital from the region.

Shorter-term leading indicators are confirming the negative signal for US economic prospects from monetary trends.

An independent calculation of the OECD’s US composite leading indicator suggests another fall in the indicator in June along with upward revisions to declines in prior months – see chart 1.

Chart 1

Chart 1 showing OECD US Leading Indicator* *Relative to Trend, Own Calculation

The indicator is calculated as a ratio to trend, i.e. a decline indicates that output will lag its trend rate of growth. The extent of the shortfall should be related to the speed of descent of the indicator. The current pace has been consistent with a recession historically.

The June indicator estimate incorporates new information for four of the seven components: housing starts, consumer sentiment, stock prices and the yield spread between 10-year Treasuries and Fed funds. Data for the remaining three – durable goods orders, the ISM manufacturing PMI and average weekly hours worked in manufacturing – will be released on 27 June, 1 July and 8 July respectively.

The indicator’s decline is notable for its breadth as well as speed: all seven components have contributed to recent weakness.

The June indicator estimate assumes little change in the three missing components. The ISM PMI could fall significantly. The Philadelphia Fed manufacturing survey for June reported a plunge in new orders (average of current and future balances), mirroring weakness in May’s Richmond Fed survey and suggesting a crash in the ISM orders index – chart 2. The latter has a 20% weight in the PMI and usually leads the other components.

Chart 2

Chart 2 showing US ISM Manufacturing New Orders & Regional Fed Manufacturing New Orders (Average of Current & Future)

A vicious real money squeeze, meanwhile, is intensifying. A weekly broad money measure calculated here was unchanged in nominal terms in early June from its level at the start of the year – chart 3. With consumer prices up by 4.1% over December-May and expected to post another large rise in June, real broad money will have contracted by about 5% (10% annualised) during H1.

Chart 3

Chart 3 showing US Weekly Broad Money Proxy* *Currency in Circulation + Commercial Bank Deposits + Money Funds

Global six-month real narrow money momentum – a key monetary leading indicator of the economy – is estimated to have moved deeper into negative territory in May, suggesting that a likely recession over the remainder of 2022 will extend into early 2023 – see chart 1.

Chart 1

Chart 1 showing G7 + E7 Industrial Output & Real Money (% 6m)

The May estimate is based on monetary data for countries accounting for a combined 65% weight in the G7 plus E7 aggregate tracked here, along with 93% CPI coverage. Missing numbers are assumed to have maintained stable rates of change.

Real money momentum of an estimated -1.2% (not annualised) compares with lows of 0.4% and -0.5% associated with the 2001 and 2008-09 recessions respectively.

Chart 2 shows a longer-term history using G7-only data. The current rate of contraction of G7 real narrow money was reached only twice over the last 50+ years – in 1973 and 1979 before severe recessions. The rate of contraction of real broad money is faster than during those episodes.

Chart 2

Chart 2 showing G7 Industrial Output & Real Money (% 6m)

Global real narrow money weakness intensified in May despite stable growth in China, mainly because of faster US contraction – chart 3. China’s positive monetary divergence may explain recent better equity market performance, with the MSCI China index now outperforming global indices year-to-date – chart 4.

Chart 3

Chart 3 showing Real Narrow Money (% 6m)

Chart 4

Chart 4 showing MSCI Price Indices USD Terms, 31 December 2021 = 100

The fall in global six-month real money momentum in May was driven by a further slowdown in nominal money growth, with six-month CPI inflation stabilising after a January-April surge – chart 5.

Chart 5

Chart 5 showing G7 + E7 Narrow Money & Consumer Prices (% 6m)

CPI momentum will almost certainly fall back in H2 – the relationship in chart 6 suggests that commodity prices would have to rise by a further 50% by December to prevent a decline.

Chart 6

Chart 6 showing G7 + E7 Consumer Prices & Commodity Prices (% 6m)

A CPI slowdown, however, could be offset by further loss of nominal money momentum – unless rising growth in China (22% weight in the G7 plus E7 aggregate) offsets likely weakness in the US / Europe.